拉里·布朗:纪念及其与观察性研究的联系

Dylan S. Small
{"title":"拉里·布朗:纪念及其与观察性研究的联系","authors":"Dylan S. Small","doi":"10.1353/obs.2018.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistics lost one of our giants when Larry Brown passed away in February, 2018 at the age of 77. Many lost a friend, a mentor and a teacher. I had the good fortune to be Larry’s colleague for the past 16 years. While I wasn’t as close to him as many others, Larry was my friend and I looked up to him. Larry loved thinking. When Larry got interested in something and scratched his head, I could see his enjoyment. Steam seemed to come out as Larry was thinking and then he happily shared his thoughts. Larry’s classes and talks were full of insights. After joining the faculty at Wharton, I attended Larry’s linear models first year PhD course even though I had seen the material before. I was glad I took the time to do so as I learned a lot, and seeing how Larry thought deeply through things from different perspectives (e.g., he often presented both a geometric and a statistical perspective) was memorable and inspiring. Larry often mentioned questions he had about methods or results, and directions of research he thought could be expanded upon, which I think motivated students to see statistics as a field full of open questions and research opportunities rather than a dead field. Larry was generous with his time. Whenever I had a student for whom it was unclear which other faculty members had the expertise to serve on their dissertation committee, I suggested asking Larry because I knew he would be willing to spend time talking with the student, read the dissertation seriously and have something thoughtful to say. A few days before Larry’s passing, when he knew his time was short, he was writing recommendation letters for students. Larry spent much time on public service, and he encouraged me about its value to society even though one may not get recognition for it. Larry worked hard. He was active in research, teaching and mentoring students and public service until his passing. The large number of Larry’s former students who traveled to his funeral from places far away at short notice (Hong Kong even!) was a testament to Larry’s impact on their lives. Larry also made good time for family and friends. Besides the much time spent together with his wife Linda and their family, Larry made the time for trips over the summer alone with his sons. Larry treated people with respect and decency regardless of their status. At a time when I was the postdoctoral coordinator for our department, a PhD student from a little known university in India contacted Larry about a post doc opening in our department and","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2018.0011","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Larry Brown: Remembrance and Connections of His Work to Observational Studies\",\"authors\":\"Dylan S. Small\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/obs.2018.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statistics lost one of our giants when Larry Brown passed away in February, 2018 at the age of 77. Many lost a friend, a mentor and a teacher. I had the good fortune to be Larry’s colleague for the past 16 years. While I wasn’t as close to him as many others, Larry was my friend and I looked up to him. Larry loved thinking. When Larry got interested in something and scratched his head, I could see his enjoyment. Steam seemed to come out as Larry was thinking and then he happily shared his thoughts. Larry’s classes and talks were full of insights. After joining the faculty at Wharton, I attended Larry’s linear models first year PhD course even though I had seen the material before. I was glad I took the time to do so as I learned a lot, and seeing how Larry thought deeply through things from different perspectives (e.g., he often presented both a geometric and a statistical perspective) was memorable and inspiring. Larry often mentioned questions he had about methods or results, and directions of research he thought could be expanded upon, which I think motivated students to see statistics as a field full of open questions and research opportunities rather than a dead field. Larry was generous with his time. Whenever I had a student for whom it was unclear which other faculty members had the expertise to serve on their dissertation committee, I suggested asking Larry because I knew he would be willing to spend time talking with the student, read the dissertation seriously and have something thoughtful to say. A few days before Larry’s passing, when he knew his time was short, he was writing recommendation letters for students. Larry spent much time on public service, and he encouraged me about its value to society even though one may not get recognition for it. Larry worked hard. He was active in research, teaching and mentoring students and public service until his passing. The large number of Larry’s former students who traveled to his funeral from places far away at short notice (Hong Kong even!) was a testament to Larry’s impact on their lives. Larry also made good time for family and friends. Besides the much time spent together with his wife Linda and their family, Larry made the time for trips over the summer alone with his sons. Larry treated people with respect and decency regardless of their status. At a time when I was the postdoctoral coordinator for our department, a PhD student from a little known university in India contacted Larry about a post doc opening in our department and\",\"PeriodicalId\":74335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Observational studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2018.0011\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Observational studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2018.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2018.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2018年2月,77岁的拉里·布朗去世了,统计学失去了一位巨人。许多人失去了朋友、导师和老师。在过去的16年里,我有幸成为拉里的同事。虽然我和他不像其他人那么亲近,但拉里是我的朋友,我很尊敬他。拉里喜欢思考。当拉里对某件事感兴趣并挠头时,我能看出他很享受。当拉里思考时,蒸汽似乎冒了出来,然后他高兴地分享了他的想法。拉里的课堂和演讲充满了真知灼见。在加入沃顿商学院后,我参加了拉里的线性模型第一年的博士课程,尽管我之前看过这些材料。我很高兴我花了时间这样做,因为我学到了很多东西,看到拉里如何从不同的角度深入思考问题(例如,他经常从几何和统计的角度来展示)是令人难忘和鼓舞人心的。拉里经常提到他对方法或结果的疑问,以及他认为可以扩展的研究方向,我认为这促使学生们将统计学视为一个充满开放问题和研究机会的领域,而不是一个死寂的领域。拉里对他的时间很慷慨。每当我遇到一个学生,不知道还有哪些老师有资格担任他们的论文委员会成员时,我就建议去问拉里,因为我知道他会愿意花时间和学生交谈,认真阅读论文,并有一些有思想的想法要说。拉里去世前几天,当他知道自己的时间不多了,他还在给学生写推荐信。拉里花了很多时间在公共服务上,他鼓励我相信公共服务对社会的价值,尽管一个人可能没有得到认可。拉里工作很努力。他一直活跃在研究、教学和指导学生以及公共服务领域,直到他去世。Larry以前的很多学生都在短时间内从很远的地方赶来参加他的葬礼(甚至是香港!),这证明了Larry对他们生活的影响。拉里也为家人和朋友创造了美好的时光。除了与妻子琳达和家人一起度过的大部分时间外,拉里还在夏天抽出时间和儿子们一起旅行。拉里不管别人的地位如何,都尊重和体面地对待他们。在我担任我们系博士后协调员的时候,一位来自印度一所不知名大学的博士生联系拉里,说我们系有一个博士后空缺
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Larry Brown: Remembrance and Connections of His Work to Observational Studies
Statistics lost one of our giants when Larry Brown passed away in February, 2018 at the age of 77. Many lost a friend, a mentor and a teacher. I had the good fortune to be Larry’s colleague for the past 16 years. While I wasn’t as close to him as many others, Larry was my friend and I looked up to him. Larry loved thinking. When Larry got interested in something and scratched his head, I could see his enjoyment. Steam seemed to come out as Larry was thinking and then he happily shared his thoughts. Larry’s classes and talks were full of insights. After joining the faculty at Wharton, I attended Larry’s linear models first year PhD course even though I had seen the material before. I was glad I took the time to do so as I learned a lot, and seeing how Larry thought deeply through things from different perspectives (e.g., he often presented both a geometric and a statistical perspective) was memorable and inspiring. Larry often mentioned questions he had about methods or results, and directions of research he thought could be expanded upon, which I think motivated students to see statistics as a field full of open questions and research opportunities rather than a dead field. Larry was generous with his time. Whenever I had a student for whom it was unclear which other faculty members had the expertise to serve on their dissertation committee, I suggested asking Larry because I knew he would be willing to spend time talking with the student, read the dissertation seriously and have something thoughtful to say. A few days before Larry’s passing, when he knew his time was short, he was writing recommendation letters for students. Larry spent much time on public service, and he encouraged me about its value to society even though one may not get recognition for it. Larry worked hard. He was active in research, teaching and mentoring students and public service until his passing. The large number of Larry’s former students who traveled to his funeral from places far away at short notice (Hong Kong even!) was a testament to Larry’s impact on their lives. Larry also made good time for family and friends. Besides the much time spent together with his wife Linda and their family, Larry made the time for trips over the summer alone with his sons. Larry treated people with respect and decency regardless of their status. At a time when I was the postdoctoral coordinator for our department, a PhD student from a little known university in India contacted Larry about a post doc opening in our department and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does matching introduce confounding or selection bias into the matched case-control design? Size-biased sensitivity analysis for matched pairs design to assess the impact of healthcare-associated infections A Software Tutorial for Matching in Clustered Observational Studies Using a difference-in-difference control trial to test an intervention aimed at increasing the take-up of a welfare payment in New Zealand Estimating Treatment Effect with Propensity Score Weighted Regression and Double Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1