重新思考尼日利亚石油区块分配、发展和汇款的“主顾”政治

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Review of African Political Economy Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/03056244.2021.1998768
V. Iwuoha
{"title":"重新思考尼日利亚石油区块分配、发展和汇款的“主顾”政治","authors":"V. Iwuoha","doi":"10.1080/03056244.2021.1998768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research adopts qualitative method and patron–client analysis to underscore the political economy of oil block allocation, development and receipts/remittances in Nigeria. It contests Wilson’s (1961) and Scott’s (1972) claims on the superiority of the patron over clients, and argues that ‘clients’ in Nigeria (indigenous oil block awardees) maintain some degree of control over the patron (ruling elite), enjoy more economic returns/oil rents, and possess some leverage over the patrons’ decision-making power. The ruling elite’s personalisation of oil block allocation/rents results in poor development of the upstream oil sector by ‘clients’, defaults in oil remittances and a consistent decline in oil production. The author recommends that the bidding process for oil block allocation be carried out in a more transparent and competitive manner.","PeriodicalId":47526,"journal":{"name":"Review of African Political Economy","volume":"48 1","pages":"552 - 580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the ‘patron–client’ politics of oil block allocation, development and remittances in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"V. Iwuoha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03056244.2021.1998768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This research adopts qualitative method and patron–client analysis to underscore the political economy of oil block allocation, development and receipts/remittances in Nigeria. It contests Wilson’s (1961) and Scott’s (1972) claims on the superiority of the patron over clients, and argues that ‘clients’ in Nigeria (indigenous oil block awardees) maintain some degree of control over the patron (ruling elite), enjoy more economic returns/oil rents, and possess some leverage over the patrons’ decision-making power. The ruling elite’s personalisation of oil block allocation/rents results in poor development of the upstream oil sector by ‘clients’, defaults in oil remittances and a consistent decline in oil production. The author recommends that the bidding process for oil block allocation be carried out in a more transparent and competitive manner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of African Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"552 - 580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of African Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2021.1998768\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of African Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2021.1998768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究采用定性方法和主顾分析来强调尼日利亚石油区块分配、开发和收入/汇款的政治经济学。它对Wilson(1961)和Scott(1972)关于赞助人优于客户的主张提出了质疑,并认为尼日利亚的“客户”(当地的石油区块获奖者)对赞助人(统治精英)保持着一定程度的控制,享有更多的经济回报/石油租金,并对赞助人的决策权拥有一定的影响力。统治精英对石油区块分配/租金的个性化导致了“客户”对上游石油部门的不良发展、石油汇款的违约和石油产量的持续下降。作者建议以更加透明和竞争的方式进行石油区块分配的招标过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking the ‘patron–client’ politics of oil block allocation, development and remittances in Nigeria
ABSTRACT This research adopts qualitative method and patron–client analysis to underscore the political economy of oil block allocation, development and receipts/remittances in Nigeria. It contests Wilson’s (1961) and Scott’s (1972) claims on the superiority of the patron over clients, and argues that ‘clients’ in Nigeria (indigenous oil block awardees) maintain some degree of control over the patron (ruling elite), enjoy more economic returns/oil rents, and possess some leverage over the patrons’ decision-making power. The ruling elite’s personalisation of oil block allocation/rents results in poor development of the upstream oil sector by ‘clients’, defaults in oil remittances and a consistent decline in oil production. The author recommends that the bidding process for oil block allocation be carried out in a more transparent and competitive manner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE) is a refereed journal committed to encouraging high quality research and fostering excellence in the understanding of African political economy. Published quarterly by Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group for the ROAPE international collective it has since 1974 provided radical analysis of trends and issues in Africa. It has paid particular attention to the political economy of inequality, exploitation and oppression, whether driven by global forces or local ones (such as class, race, community and gender), and to materialist interpretations of change in Africa. It has sustained a critical analysis of the nature of power and the state in Africa.
期刊最新文献
Resource nationalism and energy transitions in lower-income countries: the case of Tanzania Speaking out, talking back? African feminist politics and decolonial poetics of knowing, organising and loving South Africa’s unjust climate reparations: a critique of the Just Energy Transition Partnership How capitalism is destroying the Horn of Africa: sheep and the crises in Somalia and Sudan (Un)Just transition in power generation: neoliberal reforms and climate crisis in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1