超越视点变化的孪生识别:深度卷积神经网络超越人类

IF 1.9 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Applied Perception Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1145/3609224
Connor J Parde, Virginia E Strehle, Vivekjyoti Banerjee, Ying Hu, Jacqueline G Cavazos, Carlos D Castillo, Alice J O'Toole
{"title":"超越视点变化的孪生识别:深度卷积神经网络超越人类","authors":"Connor J Parde, Virginia E Strehle, Vivekjyoti Banerjee, Ying Hu, Jacqueline G Cavazos, Carlos D Castillo, Alice J O'Toole","doi":"10.1145/3609224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have achieved human-level accuracy in face identification (Phillips et al., 2018), though it is unclear how accurately they discriminate highly-similar faces. Here, humans and a DCNN performed a challenging face-identity matching task that included identical twins. Participants (<i>N</i> = 87) viewed pairs of face images of three types: same-identity, general imposters (different identities from similar demographic groups), and twin imposters (identical twin siblings). The task was to determine whether the pairs showed the same person or different people. Identity comparisons were tested in three viewpoint-disparity conditions: frontal to frontal, frontal to 45° profile, and frontal to 90°profile. Accuracy for discriminating matched-identity pairs from twin-imposter pairs and general-imposter pairs was assessed in each viewpoint-disparity condition. Humans were more accurate for general-imposter pairs than twin-imposter pairs, and accuracy declined with increased viewpoint disparity between the images in a pair. A DCNN trained for face identification (Ranjan et al., 2018) was tested on the same image pairs presented to humans. Machine performance mirrored the pattern of human accuracy, but with performance at or above all humans in all but one condition. Human and machine similarity scores were compared across all image-pair types. This item-level analysis showed that human and machine similarity ratings correlated significantly in six of nine image-pair types [range <i>r</i> = 0.38 to <i>r</i> = 0.63], suggesting general accord between the perception of face similarity by humans and the DCNN. These findings also contribute to our understanding of DCNN performance for discriminating high-resemblance faces, demonstrate that the DCNN performs at a level at or above humans, and suggest a degree of parity between the features used by humans and the DCNN.</p>","PeriodicalId":50921,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Applied Perception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twin Identification over Viewpoint Change: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network Surpasses Humans.\",\"authors\":\"Connor J Parde, Virginia E Strehle, Vivekjyoti Banerjee, Ying Hu, Jacqueline G Cavazos, Carlos D Castillo, Alice J O'Toole\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3609224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have achieved human-level accuracy in face identification (Phillips et al., 2018), though it is unclear how accurately they discriminate highly-similar faces. Here, humans and a DCNN performed a challenging face-identity matching task that included identical twins. Participants (<i>N</i> = 87) viewed pairs of face images of three types: same-identity, general imposters (different identities from similar demographic groups), and twin imposters (identical twin siblings). The task was to determine whether the pairs showed the same person or different people. Identity comparisons were tested in three viewpoint-disparity conditions: frontal to frontal, frontal to 45° profile, and frontal to 90°profile. Accuracy for discriminating matched-identity pairs from twin-imposter pairs and general-imposter pairs was assessed in each viewpoint-disparity condition. Humans were more accurate for general-imposter pairs than twin-imposter pairs, and accuracy declined with increased viewpoint disparity between the images in a pair. A DCNN trained for face identification (Ranjan et al., 2018) was tested on the same image pairs presented to humans. Machine performance mirrored the pattern of human accuracy, but with performance at or above all humans in all but one condition. Human and machine similarity scores were compared across all image-pair types. This item-level analysis showed that human and machine similarity ratings correlated significantly in six of nine image-pair types [range <i>r</i> = 0.38 to <i>r</i> = 0.63], suggesting general accord between the perception of face similarity by humans and the DCNN. These findings also contribute to our understanding of DCNN performance for discriminating high-resemblance faces, demonstrate that the DCNN performs at a level at or above humans, and suggest a degree of parity between the features used by humans and the DCNN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Applied Perception\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Applied Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3609224\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Applied Perception","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3609224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度卷积神经网络(DCNN)在人脸识别方面已经达到了人类水平的准确性(Phillips et al.,2018),但尚不清楚它们区分高度相似人脸的准确性。在这里,人类和DCNN执行了一项具有挑战性的人脸身份匹配任务,其中包括同卵双胞胎。参与者(N=87)观看了三种类型的成对人脸图像:相同身份、普通冒名顶替者(来自相似人口群体的不同身份)和双胞胎冒名顶替(同卵双胞胎兄弟姐妹)。任务是确定这对情侣是同一个人还是不同的人。在三种视角差异条件下测试身份比较:正面到正面、正面到45°轮廓和正面到90°轮廓。在每个视点视差条件下,评估了从双冒名顶替者对和一般冒名顶替对中区分匹配身份对的准确性。与双胞胎冒名顶替者对相比,人类对普通冒名顶替对更准确,并且准确性随着一对图像之间视点视差的增加而下降。针对人脸识别训练的DCNN(Ranjan等人,2018)在呈现给人类的相同图像对上进行了测试。机器性能反映了人类准确性的模式,但在除一种情况外的所有情况下,其性能都达到或高于所有人类。对所有图像对类型的人机相似性得分进行比较。该项目级分析显示,在九种图像对类型中的六种图像对中,人和机器的相似性评级显著相关[范围r=0.38至r=0.63],表明人类对人脸相似性的感知与DCNN之间总体一致。这些发现也有助于我们理解DCNN在识别高相似度人脸方面的性能,证明DCNN的性能达到或高于人类的水平,并表明人类使用的特征与DCNN之间存在一定程度的对等性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Twin Identification over Viewpoint Change: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network Surpasses Humans.

Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have achieved human-level accuracy in face identification (Phillips et al., 2018), though it is unclear how accurately they discriminate highly-similar faces. Here, humans and a DCNN performed a challenging face-identity matching task that included identical twins. Participants (N = 87) viewed pairs of face images of three types: same-identity, general imposters (different identities from similar demographic groups), and twin imposters (identical twin siblings). The task was to determine whether the pairs showed the same person or different people. Identity comparisons were tested in three viewpoint-disparity conditions: frontal to frontal, frontal to 45° profile, and frontal to 90°profile. Accuracy for discriminating matched-identity pairs from twin-imposter pairs and general-imposter pairs was assessed in each viewpoint-disparity condition. Humans were more accurate for general-imposter pairs than twin-imposter pairs, and accuracy declined with increased viewpoint disparity between the images in a pair. A DCNN trained for face identification (Ranjan et al., 2018) was tested on the same image pairs presented to humans. Machine performance mirrored the pattern of human accuracy, but with performance at or above all humans in all but one condition. Human and machine similarity scores were compared across all image-pair types. This item-level analysis showed that human and machine similarity ratings correlated significantly in six of nine image-pair types [range r = 0.38 to r = 0.63], suggesting general accord between the perception of face similarity by humans and the DCNN. These findings also contribute to our understanding of DCNN performance for discriminating high-resemblance faces, demonstrate that the DCNN performs at a level at or above humans, and suggest a degree of parity between the features used by humans and the DCNN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) aims to strengthen the synergy between computer science and psychology/perception by publishing top quality papers that help to unify research in these fields. The journal publishes inter-disciplinary research of significant and lasting value in any topic area that spans both Computer Science and Perceptual Psychology. All papers must incorporate both perceptual and computer science components.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Reality Audio Game for Entertainment & Sound Localization Training The Impact of Nature Realism on the Restorative Quality of Virtual Reality Forest Bathing Color Theme Evaluation through User Preference Modeling Understanding the Impact of Visual and Kinematic Information on the Perception of Physicality Errors Decoding Functional Brain Data for Emotion Recognition: A Machine Learning Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1