“劳动是我们的歌!”:保加利亚社会主义工作乌托邦中的聋人

I. Dimitrova
{"title":"“劳动是我们的歌!”:保加利亚社会主义工作乌托邦中的聋人","authors":"I. Dimitrova","doi":"10.3828/JLCDS.2021.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silence is the official periodical of the Bulgarian Union of the Deaf. Its first issue was published in 1957. At this relatively early stage of state socialism, the Union was virtually the single space of representation of deafness in Bulgaria. Although established in the 1930s, predominantly thanks to the efforts of several deaf activists,1 during the socialist era the Union functioned largely as a state and Party extension. Thus, the representation of deafness may be considered as pertaining to and informed by the official ideology; as an imposed framing which creates peculiar moral economy and “cultural opportunity structure” (Noonan 85). Certainly, from this it does not follow that the mundane orchestration of everyday life of deaf Bulgarians is entirely governed by this representation, but it still deserves attention since it is a key factor, defining the scope of meanings and imageries which could be attached to deafness, publicly as well as in the (quasi) activist aspirations and identity-building. My reflections, which I briefly share in this piece, rest on a content analysis of the issues of Silence from 1957 until the early 1970s, when a shift in the ideology can be observed towards certain diversification of the cultural repertoire. Thus I focus on the early socialist period, which creates one markedly labourobsessed symbolic universe. I read the issues against the background of additional textual materials, focusing on disability assessment and especially on the organized state effort and official disability policy to (re)insert as many disabled people as possible in the work-based system, unburdening in this way the need-based system (Stone 15). In this context, labour is conceptualized and acclaimed as a curative and prophylactic activity, beneficial for the physical and emotional well-being of disabled people. However, it is mainly defined as a fundamental moral duty, which is community-oriented since it contributes","PeriodicalId":37229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"239 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Labour Is Our Song!”: Deaf in the Bulgarian Socialist Work Utopia\",\"authors\":\"I. Dimitrova\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/JLCDS.2021.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Silence is the official periodical of the Bulgarian Union of the Deaf. Its first issue was published in 1957. At this relatively early stage of state socialism, the Union was virtually the single space of representation of deafness in Bulgaria. Although established in the 1930s, predominantly thanks to the efforts of several deaf activists,1 during the socialist era the Union functioned largely as a state and Party extension. Thus, the representation of deafness may be considered as pertaining to and informed by the official ideology; as an imposed framing which creates peculiar moral economy and “cultural opportunity structure” (Noonan 85). Certainly, from this it does not follow that the mundane orchestration of everyday life of deaf Bulgarians is entirely governed by this representation, but it still deserves attention since it is a key factor, defining the scope of meanings and imageries which could be attached to deafness, publicly as well as in the (quasi) activist aspirations and identity-building. My reflections, which I briefly share in this piece, rest on a content analysis of the issues of Silence from 1957 until the early 1970s, when a shift in the ideology can be observed towards certain diversification of the cultural repertoire. Thus I focus on the early socialist period, which creates one markedly labourobsessed symbolic universe. I read the issues against the background of additional textual materials, focusing on disability assessment and especially on the organized state effort and official disability policy to (re)insert as many disabled people as possible in the work-based system, unburdening in this way the need-based system (Stone 15). In this context, labour is conceptualized and acclaimed as a curative and prophylactic activity, beneficial for the physical and emotional well-being of disabled people. However, it is mainly defined as a fundamental moral duty, which is community-oriented since it contributes\",\"PeriodicalId\":37229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"239 - 243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/JLCDS.2021.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/JLCDS.2021.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《沉默》是保加利亚聋人联盟的官方期刊。它的第一期出版于1957年。在国家社会主义相对早期的阶段,联邦实际上是保加利亚耳聋的唯一代表空间。尽管联邦成立于20世纪30年代,主要归功于几位聋人活动家的努力,1但在社会主义时代,联邦在很大程度上是国家和政党的延伸。因此,耳聋的表现可能被认为与官方意识形态有关,并受到官方意识形态的影响;作为一种强加的框架,它创造了独特的道德经济和“文化机会结构”(Noonan 85)。当然,从这一点来看,保加利亚聋人日常生活的世俗编排并不完全受这种表现的支配,但它仍然值得关注,因为它是一个关键因素,定义了耳聋的含义和意象的范围,无论是在公开场合,还是在(准)活动家的愿望和身份建设中。我在这篇文章中简要地分享了我的思考,这些思考基于对1957年至20世纪70年代初《沉默》问题的内容分析,当时可以观察到意识形态向文化曲目的某种多样性转变。因此,我把重点放在社会主义早期,它创造了一个明显痴迷于劳动的象征性世界。我在阅读其他文本材料的背景下阅读了这些问题,重点是残疾评估,特别是有组织的国家努力和官方残疾政策,以(重新)将尽可能多的残疾人纳入基于工作的系统,从而减轻基于需求的系统的负担(Stone 15)。在这种情况下,劳动被认为是一种治疗和预防活动,有利于残疾人的身心健康。然而,它主要被定义为一种基本的道德义务,它是以社区为导向的,因为它有助于
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Labour Is Our Song!”: Deaf in the Bulgarian Socialist Work Utopia
Silence is the official periodical of the Bulgarian Union of the Deaf. Its first issue was published in 1957. At this relatively early stage of state socialism, the Union was virtually the single space of representation of deafness in Bulgaria. Although established in the 1930s, predominantly thanks to the efforts of several deaf activists,1 during the socialist era the Union functioned largely as a state and Party extension. Thus, the representation of deafness may be considered as pertaining to and informed by the official ideology; as an imposed framing which creates peculiar moral economy and “cultural opportunity structure” (Noonan 85). Certainly, from this it does not follow that the mundane orchestration of everyday life of deaf Bulgarians is entirely governed by this representation, but it still deserves attention since it is a key factor, defining the scope of meanings and imageries which could be attached to deafness, publicly as well as in the (quasi) activist aspirations and identity-building. My reflections, which I briefly share in this piece, rest on a content analysis of the issues of Silence from 1957 until the early 1970s, when a shift in the ideology can be observed towards certain diversification of the cultural repertoire. Thus I focus on the early socialist period, which creates one markedly labourobsessed symbolic universe. I read the issues against the background of additional textual materials, focusing on disability assessment and especially on the organized state effort and official disability policy to (re)insert as many disabled people as possible in the work-based system, unburdening in this way the need-based system (Stone 15). In this context, labour is conceptualized and acclaimed as a curative and prophylactic activity, beneficial for the physical and emotional well-being of disabled people. However, it is mainly defined as a fundamental moral duty, which is community-oriented since it contributes
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies
Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the Species Divide About the Contributors Cripping the Ordinary: Veena Das’s Life and Words in “Unprecedented Times” From Freak Shows to Freaknature Index to Volume 17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1