规划标准与空间公正

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING Planning Theory & Practice Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI:10.1080/14649357.2022.2061773
M. Ng
{"title":"规划标准与空间公正","authors":"M. Ng","doi":"10.1080/14649357.2022.2061773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"fl ood resilient spatial planning in two case studies in the Netherlands. In the Dutch Multi-Layer Safety concept, fl ood resilient spatial planning is considered as the second layer in between direct fl ood protection ( fi rst layer) and crisis management (third layer). The paper provides a useful practice-informed framework to assess fl ood resilient spatial planning from the spatial-physical and institu-tional-organizational dimensions. The authors argue that as maximum fl ood depths in deltaic and coastal areas in the Netherlands are generally very deep, there is a limit to fl ood resilient spatial planning, especially when fi nancial resources and cost-bene fi t analysis are considered. Comparatively speaking, the institutional barriers such as raising awareness, enhancing collaboration or concerted responsibilities to fl ood resilient spatial planning are more surmountable and may create synergy with other aspects of urban developments. the heterogeneity of “ public interests ” involved when a government plays a “ hybrid ” role (as an entrepreneur as well as a regulator) to transact or contract with the private sector. Their case study is the Dutch state selling Amsterdam ’ s Bijlmer prison. They conclude that “ subjective, pragmatic and context-speci fi c choices ” made by the involved parties are crucial to balance the dilemma of prioritising fi nancial revenue or social value, organising a private transaction or a public tender, and choosing fl exibility or certainty.","PeriodicalId":47693,"journal":{"name":"Planning Theory & Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"167 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning Standards and Spatial (in)Justice\",\"authors\":\"M. Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649357.2022.2061773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"fl ood resilient spatial planning in two case studies in the Netherlands. In the Dutch Multi-Layer Safety concept, fl ood resilient spatial planning is considered as the second layer in between direct fl ood protection ( fi rst layer) and crisis management (third layer). The paper provides a useful practice-informed framework to assess fl ood resilient spatial planning from the spatial-physical and institu-tional-organizational dimensions. The authors argue that as maximum fl ood depths in deltaic and coastal areas in the Netherlands are generally very deep, there is a limit to fl ood resilient spatial planning, especially when fi nancial resources and cost-bene fi t analysis are considered. Comparatively speaking, the institutional barriers such as raising awareness, enhancing collaboration or concerted responsibilities to fl ood resilient spatial planning are more surmountable and may create synergy with other aspects of urban developments. the heterogeneity of “ public interests ” involved when a government plays a “ hybrid ” role (as an entrepreneur as well as a regulator) to transact or contract with the private sector. Their case study is the Dutch state selling Amsterdam ’ s Bijlmer prison. They conclude that “ subjective, pragmatic and context-speci fi c choices ” made by the involved parties are crucial to balance the dilemma of prioritising fi nancial revenue or social value, organising a private transaction or a public tender, and choosing fl exibility or certainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Theory & Practice\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"167 - 172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Theory & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2061773\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Theory & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2022.2061773","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

荷兰两个案例研究中的弹性空间规划。在荷兰多层安全概念中,弹性空间规划被视为介于直接保护(第一层)和危机管理(第三层)之间的第二层。本文提供了一个有用的实践知情框架,用于从空间物理和机构组织维度评估弹性良好的空间规划。作者认为,由于荷兰三角洲和沿海地区的最大水深通常非常深,因此弹性空间规划是有限的,尤其是在考虑财政资源和成本效益分析的情况下。相比之下,提高认识、加强合作或共同承担责任等制度障碍更容易克服,并可能与城市发展的其他方面产生协同作用。当政府扮演“混合”角色(作为企业家和监管机构)与私营部门进行交易或签订合同时,所涉及的“公共利益”的异质性。他们的案例研究是荷兰政府出售阿姆斯特丹的比尔默监狱。他们得出的结论是,相关各方做出的“主观、务实和特定背景的选择”对于平衡优先考虑财政收入或社会价值、组织私人交易或公开招标以及选择灵活性或确定性的困境至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Planning Standards and Spatial (in)Justice
fl ood resilient spatial planning in two case studies in the Netherlands. In the Dutch Multi-Layer Safety concept, fl ood resilient spatial planning is considered as the second layer in between direct fl ood protection ( fi rst layer) and crisis management (third layer). The paper provides a useful practice-informed framework to assess fl ood resilient spatial planning from the spatial-physical and institu-tional-organizational dimensions. The authors argue that as maximum fl ood depths in deltaic and coastal areas in the Netherlands are generally very deep, there is a limit to fl ood resilient spatial planning, especially when fi nancial resources and cost-bene fi t analysis are considered. Comparatively speaking, the institutional barriers such as raising awareness, enhancing collaboration or concerted responsibilities to fl ood resilient spatial planning are more surmountable and may create synergy with other aspects of urban developments. the heterogeneity of “ public interests ” involved when a government plays a “ hybrid ” role (as an entrepreneur as well as a regulator) to transact or contract with the private sector. Their case study is the Dutch state selling Amsterdam ’ s Bijlmer prison. They conclude that “ subjective, pragmatic and context-speci fi c choices ” made by the involved parties are crucial to balance the dilemma of prioritising fi nancial revenue or social value, organising a private transaction or a public tender, and choosing fl exibility or certainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Planning Theory & Practice provides an international focus for the development of theory and practice in spatial planning and a forum to promote the policy dimensions of space and place. Published four times a year in conjunction with the Royal Town Planning Institute, London, it publishes original articles and review papers from both academics and practitioners with the aim of encouraging more effective, two-way communication between theory and practice. The Editors invite robustly researched papers which raise issues at the leading edge of planning theory and practice, and welcome papers on controversial subjects. Contributors in the early stages of their academic careers are encouraged, as are rejoinders to items previously published.
期刊最新文献
The Power of Interruptions Technology-Oriented Community-Engaged Learning in Urban Planning Wrestling with Context Experimental Urban Planning: Tensions Behind the Proliferation of Urban Laboratories in Latin America ‘Dealing’ with Governance and Planning? The Limits of Urban Intrapreneurialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1