Kahoot的就业评估!在面对面和非面对面的高等教育中。

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education in the Knowledge Society Pub Date : 2020-09-11 DOI:10.14201/eks.22910
Juan Pablo Hernández-Ramos, María Luisa Belmonte
{"title":"Kahoot的就业评估!在面对面和非面对面的高等教育中。","authors":"Juan Pablo Hernández-Ramos, María Luisa Belmonte","doi":"10.14201/eks.22910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many technological resources available to university teachers, and their use, with a transparent teaching methodology, can improve and update higher education, both in face-to-face and virtual training. Platforms such as Kahoot!, accompanied by the student’s smartphone, allow the teacher to create a classroom response system (CRS) a fast and straightforward way. The present study, with a non-experimental design, is developed to assess the use of this tool in higher education, both in a face-to-face format and through a virtual learning environment. After applying an electronic questionnaire (20 items; ?=.958) to a sample of 148 students (94 in the face-to-face mode and 54 in the virtual mode) whose teachers had used Kahoot! with the same methodological planning, a high degree of predisposition for their employment as future teaching professionals and positive perception of the resource is detected, especially when assessing their potential for self-assessment of the learning process and assimilation of the basic concepts of the subject. Likewise, after the Mann-Whitney U test, it was found that students in the virtual mode showed a higher score than those in the face-to-face mode. It concludes by stressing the importance of teachers using technological resources such as Kahoot to promote innovative methodologies for the benefit of quality higher education. Besides, as a consequence of the previous studies, it is considered that the discrepancies found are due to a more positive evaluation in the training modality where the use of this type of resources is more innovative.","PeriodicalId":45123,"journal":{"name":"Education in the Knowledge Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación del empleo de Kahoot! en la enseñanza superior presencial y no presencial.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Pablo Hernández-Ramos, María Luisa Belmonte\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/eks.22910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many technological resources available to university teachers, and their use, with a transparent teaching methodology, can improve and update higher education, both in face-to-face and virtual training. Platforms such as Kahoot!, accompanied by the student’s smartphone, allow the teacher to create a classroom response system (CRS) a fast and straightforward way. The present study, with a non-experimental design, is developed to assess the use of this tool in higher education, both in a face-to-face format and through a virtual learning environment. After applying an electronic questionnaire (20 items; ?=.958) to a sample of 148 students (94 in the face-to-face mode and 54 in the virtual mode) whose teachers had used Kahoot! with the same methodological planning, a high degree of predisposition for their employment as future teaching professionals and positive perception of the resource is detected, especially when assessing their potential for self-assessment of the learning process and assimilation of the basic concepts of the subject. Likewise, after the Mann-Whitney U test, it was found that students in the virtual mode showed a higher score than those in the face-to-face mode. It concludes by stressing the importance of teachers using technological resources such as Kahoot to promote innovative methodologies for the benefit of quality higher education. Besides, as a consequence of the previous studies, it is considered that the discrepancies found are due to a more positive evaluation in the training modality where the use of this type of resources is more innovative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education in the Knowledge Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education in the Knowledge Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22910\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education in the Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.22910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

大学教师可以使用许多技术资源,通过透明的教学方法,可以改善和更新高等教育,无论是面对面的还是虚拟的培训。诸如Kahoot!,与学生的智能手机一起,让老师能够以一种快速而直接的方式创建课堂响应系统(CRS)。本研究采用非实验设计,旨在评估该工具在高等教育中的使用情况,包括面对面形式和虚拟学习环境。申请电子问卷(20项)后;?=.958)对148名学生(面对面模式94名,虚拟模式54名)的样本进行了调查,这些学生的老师使用过Kahoot!通过同样的方法规划,可以发现他们作为未来教学专业人员的高度倾向和对资源的积极感知,特别是在评估他们对学习过程和学科基本概念同化的自我评估潜力时。同样,经过Mann-Whitney U测试,发现虚拟模式下的学生比面对面模式下的学生表现出更高的分数。报告最后强调了教师利用Kahoot等技术资源促进创新方法以提高高等教育质量的重要性。此外,根据以往的研究,我们认为所发现的差异是由于对这类资源的使用更具创新性的培训方式的评价更为积极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluación del empleo de Kahoot! en la enseñanza superior presencial y no presencial.
There are many technological resources available to university teachers, and their use, with a transparent teaching methodology, can improve and update higher education, both in face-to-face and virtual training. Platforms such as Kahoot!, accompanied by the student’s smartphone, allow the teacher to create a classroom response system (CRS) a fast and straightforward way. The present study, with a non-experimental design, is developed to assess the use of this tool in higher education, both in a face-to-face format and through a virtual learning environment. After applying an electronic questionnaire (20 items; ?=.958) to a sample of 148 students (94 in the face-to-face mode and 54 in the virtual mode) whose teachers had used Kahoot! with the same methodological planning, a high degree of predisposition for their employment as future teaching professionals and positive perception of the resource is detected, especially when assessing their potential for self-assessment of the learning process and assimilation of the basic concepts of the subject. Likewise, after the Mann-Whitney U test, it was found that students in the virtual mode showed a higher score than those in the face-to-face mode. It concludes by stressing the importance of teachers using technological resources such as Kahoot to promote innovative methodologies for the benefit of quality higher education. Besides, as a consequence of the previous studies, it is considered that the discrepancies found are due to a more positive evaluation in the training modality where the use of this type of resources is more innovative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education in the Knowledge Society
Education in the Knowledge Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
10.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Percepción de alumnos y familias sobre la robótica educativa en la educación no formal Redes sociales y Educación Superior en la era COVID-19: Influencia de la trayectoria de aprendizaje de la metodología Self Directed Based Learning en el éxito académico Hábitos de estudio desarrollados durante la complejidad digital en la pandemia: Investigación comparada entre estudiantes universitarios de México y Colombia Análisis de proyectos de buenas prácticas en el marco del programa Erasmus+ centrados en el eLearning o TIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1