将风险纳入人类-自动化信任的重要性

Rachel E. Stuck, Brianna J. Tomlinson, B. Walker
{"title":"将风险纳入人类-自动化信任的重要性","authors":"Rachel E. Stuck, Brianna J. Tomlinson, B. Walker","doi":"10.1080/1463922X.2021.1975170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A key psychological component of interactions in both human-human and human-automation relationships is trust. Although trust has repeatedly been conceptualized as having a component of risk, the role risk plays, as well as what elements of risk impact trust (e.g., perceived risk, risk-taking propensity), has not been clearly explained. Upon reviewing the foundational theories of trust, it is clear that trust is only needed when risk exists or is perceived to exist, in both human-human and human-automation contexts. Within the limited research that has explored human-automation trust and risk, it has been found that the presence of risk and a participant’s perceived situational risk impacts their behavioural trust of the automation. In addition, perceived relational risk has a strong negative relationship with trust. We provide an enhanced model of trust to demonstrate how risk interacts with trust, incorporating these distinct perceived risks, as well as risk-taking propensity. This model identifies the unique interactions of these components with trust based on both the theory reviewed and the studies that have explored some aspects of these relationships. Guidelines are provided for improving the study of human-automation trust via the incorporation of risk.","PeriodicalId":22852,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of incorporating risk into human-automation trust\",\"authors\":\"Rachel E. Stuck, Brianna J. Tomlinson, B. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1463922X.2021.1975170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A key psychological component of interactions in both human-human and human-automation relationships is trust. Although trust has repeatedly been conceptualized as having a component of risk, the role risk plays, as well as what elements of risk impact trust (e.g., perceived risk, risk-taking propensity), has not been clearly explained. Upon reviewing the foundational theories of trust, it is clear that trust is only needed when risk exists or is perceived to exist, in both human-human and human-automation contexts. Within the limited research that has explored human-automation trust and risk, it has been found that the presence of risk and a participant’s perceived situational risk impacts their behavioural trust of the automation. In addition, perceived relational risk has a strong negative relationship with trust. We provide an enhanced model of trust to demonstrate how risk interacts with trust, incorporating these distinct perceived risks, as well as risk-taking propensity. This model identifies the unique interactions of these components with trust based on both the theory reviewed and the studies that have explored some aspects of these relationships. Guidelines are provided for improving the study of human-automation trust via the incorporation of risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1975170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1975170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

摘要人与人之间以及人与自动化关系中互动的一个关键心理组成部分是信任。尽管信任一再被概念化为具有风险的一个组成部分,但风险所扮演的角色,以及风险的哪些因素(如感知风险、冒险倾向)对信任的影响,都没有得到明确的解释。在回顾信任的基本理论后,很明显,只有在人类和人类自动化环境中存在或被认为存在风险时,才需要信任。在探索人类自动化信任和风险的有限研究中,发现风险的存在和参与者感知的情境风险会影响他们对自动化的行为信任。此外,感知到的关系风险与信任有着强烈的负向关系。我们提供了一个增强的信任模型来证明风险如何与信任相互作用,包括这些不同的感知风险以及冒险倾向。该模型基于所回顾的理论和探索这些关系某些方面的研究,确定了这些组成部分与信任的独特相互作用。提供了通过纳入风险来改进人类自动化信任研究的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The importance of incorporating risk into human-automation trust
Abstract A key psychological component of interactions in both human-human and human-automation relationships is trust. Although trust has repeatedly been conceptualized as having a component of risk, the role risk plays, as well as what elements of risk impact trust (e.g., perceived risk, risk-taking propensity), has not been clearly explained. Upon reviewing the foundational theories of trust, it is clear that trust is only needed when risk exists or is perceived to exist, in both human-human and human-automation contexts. Within the limited research that has explored human-automation trust and risk, it has been found that the presence of risk and a participant’s perceived situational risk impacts their behavioural trust of the automation. In addition, perceived relational risk has a strong negative relationship with trust. We provide an enhanced model of trust to demonstrate how risk interacts with trust, incorporating these distinct perceived risks, as well as risk-taking propensity. This model identifies the unique interactions of these components with trust based on both the theory reviewed and the studies that have explored some aspects of these relationships. Guidelines are provided for improving the study of human-automation trust via the incorporation of risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Impact of the ambulatory surgery system on the usability of a home medical device for post-operative follow-up: a mixed-method study in simulation Using anthropomorphism, transparency, and feedback to improve phishing detection aids The role of participatory ergonomics in supporting the safety of healthcare workers; a systematic review Safety leadership and safety citizenship behavior: the mediating roles of safety knowledge, safety motivation, and psychological contract of safety An ecological theory of learning transfer in human activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1