绩效增强态度量表(豌豆)达到“成年”:来自系统回顾和荟萃分析的经验教训和建议

Dirk Folkerts, Roland Loh, A. Petróczi, Sebastian Brueckner
{"title":"绩效增强态度量表(豌豆)达到“成年”:来自系统回顾和荟萃分析的经验教训和建议","authors":"Dirk Folkerts, Roland Loh, A. Petróczi, Sebastian Brueckner","doi":"10.31236/osf.io/k6gye","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on doping attitude has relied heavily on the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS). Yet, to date, no systematic review and meta-analysis of the PEAS have been conducted. Thus, the purpose of this study is, for the first time, to cumulate evidence for the psychometric properties of PEAS; specifically to conduct a qualitative synthesis and perform a meta-analysis to analyze the available results and findings for internal consistency reliability, gender differences and user/non-user differences in doping attitude assessed by the PEAS. The meta-analysis showed good level of internal consistency reliability for the PEAS. Overall, negative doping attitude characterized the athlete population, regardless of gender or involvement in doping. The latter, coupled with sole reliance on self-reports, questions the validity of PEAS as proxy for indexing doping behavior; and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the role of attitudes toward doping and clean sport behaviour.","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":"1 1","pages":"101999"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS) reached ‘adulthood’: Lessons and recommendations from a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Dirk Folkerts, Roland Loh, A. Petróczi, Sebastian Brueckner\",\"doi\":\"10.31236/osf.io/k6gye\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on doping attitude has relied heavily on the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS). Yet, to date, no systematic review and meta-analysis of the PEAS have been conducted. Thus, the purpose of this study is, for the first time, to cumulate evidence for the psychometric properties of PEAS; specifically to conduct a qualitative synthesis and perform a meta-analysis to analyze the available results and findings for internal consistency reliability, gender differences and user/non-user differences in doping attitude assessed by the PEAS. The meta-analysis showed good level of internal consistency reliability for the PEAS. Overall, negative doping attitude characterized the athlete population, regardless of gender or involvement in doping. The latter, coupled with sole reliance on self-reports, questions the validity of PEAS as proxy for indexing doping behavior; and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the role of attitudes toward doping and clean sport behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of sport and exercise\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"101999\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of sport and exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31236/osf.io/k6gye\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of sport and exercise","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31236/osf.io/k6gye","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

兴奋剂态度的研究在很大程度上依赖于表现增强态度量表(PEAS)。然而,到目前为止,还没有对PEAS进行系统的回顾和荟萃分析。因此,本研究的目的是,首次为PEAS的心理测量特性积累证据;特别是进行定性综合并进行荟萃分析,以分析PEAS评估的内部一致性可靠性、性别差异和使用者/非使用者兴奋剂态度差异的可用结果和发现。荟萃分析显示PEAS具有良好的内部一致性可靠性。总的来说,消极的兴奋剂态度是运动员群体的特征,无论性别或是否参与兴奋剂。后者,再加上完全依赖自我报告,质疑PEAS作为兴奋剂行为指标的有效性;并呼吁更细致地理解人们对兴奋剂和清洁体育行为的态度所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS) reached ‘adulthood’: Lessons and recommendations from a systematic review and meta-analysis
Research on doping attitude has relied heavily on the Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS). Yet, to date, no systematic review and meta-analysis of the PEAS have been conducted. Thus, the purpose of this study is, for the first time, to cumulate evidence for the psychometric properties of PEAS; specifically to conduct a qualitative synthesis and perform a meta-analysis to analyze the available results and findings for internal consistency reliability, gender differences and user/non-user differences in doping attitude assessed by the PEAS. The meta-analysis showed good level of internal consistency reliability for the PEAS. Overall, negative doping attitude characterized the athlete population, regardless of gender or involvement in doping. The latter, coupled with sole reliance on self-reports, questions the validity of PEAS as proxy for indexing doping behavior; and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the role of attitudes toward doping and clean sport behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Within-person associations between daily stress and physical activity during working and non-working hours. Behind the mask: Attentional focus and coping strategies of elite level fencers. Navigating Athlete Development in Elite Sport: Understanding the Barriers to the Provision of Performance Lifestyle Service in England. Expertise Advantage of Automatic Prediction in Visual Motion Representation is Domain-General: A Meta-Analysis. No transfer of 3D-Multiple Object Tracking training on game performance in soccer: A follow-up study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1