农业项目改善粮食安全的潜力:一个多国视角

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100529
Alessandra Garbero, Lisa Jäckering
{"title":"农业项目改善粮食安全的潜力:一个多国视角","authors":"Alessandra Garbero,&nbsp;Lisa Jäckering","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although an emerging literature evaluates the impact of agricultural interventions on food<span> security, studies taking a multi-country perspective are scarce. We construct a cross-project dataset - encompassing 14 household surveys from IFAD-funded project-level impact evaluations in 13 different countries - to analyze the overall effect of different agricultural interventions on food security<span>. We use the Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) as a measure for household-level access to dietary energy and quality, and the prevalence of food insecurity based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) as a complementarity, subjective indicator for food security. Results of random coefficient models show that agricultural interventions can improve food security, especially for beneficiaries of agricultural projects living in food insecure countries. We further show a slight dietary shift towards animal-sourced foods attributed to agricultural interventions implemented in low-income countries. Thus, especially in these settings, adding a specific nutrition component to agricultural projects could be effective in preventing a further shift towards unhealthy diets and halting the double (or even triple) burden of malnutrition before it can develop further.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100529"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100529","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potential of agricultural programs for improving food security: A multi-country perspective\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Garbero,&nbsp;Lisa Jäckering\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although an emerging literature evaluates the impact of agricultural interventions on food<span> security, studies taking a multi-country perspective are scarce. We construct a cross-project dataset - encompassing 14 household surveys from IFAD-funded project-level impact evaluations in 13 different countries - to analyze the overall effect of different agricultural interventions on food security<span>. We use the Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) as a measure for household-level access to dietary energy and quality, and the prevalence of food insecurity based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) as a complementarity, subjective indicator for food security. Results of random coefficient models show that agricultural interventions can improve food security, especially for beneficiaries of agricultural projects living in food insecure countries. We further show a slight dietary shift towards animal-sourced foods attributed to agricultural interventions implemented in low-income countries. Thus, especially in these settings, adding a specific nutrition component to agricultural projects could be effective in preventing a further shift towards unhealthy diets and halting the double (or even triple) burden of malnutrition before it can develop further.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100529\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912421000390\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912421000390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

虽然新兴文献评估了农业干预对粮食安全的影响,但采取多国视角的研究很少。我们构建了一个跨项目数据集——包括农发基金资助的13个不同国家的项目级影响评估中的14个家庭调查——以分析不同农业干预对粮食安全的总体影响。我们使用家庭膳食多样性评分(hdd)作为家庭层面获得膳食能量和质量的衡量标准,并使用基于粮食不安全体验量表(FIES)的粮食不安全发生率作为粮食安全的补充主观指标。随机系数模型的结果表明,农业干预措施可以改善粮食安全,特别是对生活在粮食不安全国家的农业项目受益者而言。我们进一步表明,由于低收入国家实施的农业干预措施,饮食向动物源性食品的轻微转变。因此,特别是在这些情况下,在农业项目中增加特定的营养成分可以有效地防止进一步转向不健康的饮食,并在营养不良进一步发展之前遏制两倍(甚至三倍)的营养不良负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The potential of agricultural programs for improving food security: A multi-country perspective

Although an emerging literature evaluates the impact of agricultural interventions on food security, studies taking a multi-country perspective are scarce. We construct a cross-project dataset - encompassing 14 household surveys from IFAD-funded project-level impact evaluations in 13 different countries - to analyze the overall effect of different agricultural interventions on food security. We use the Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) as a measure for household-level access to dietary energy and quality, and the prevalence of food insecurity based on the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) as a complementarity, subjective indicator for food security. Results of random coefficient models show that agricultural interventions can improve food security, especially for beneficiaries of agricultural projects living in food insecure countries. We further show a slight dietary shift towards animal-sourced foods attributed to agricultural interventions implemented in low-income countries. Thus, especially in these settings, adding a specific nutrition component to agricultural projects could be effective in preventing a further shift towards unhealthy diets and halting the double (or even triple) burden of malnutrition before it can develop further.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
期刊最新文献
Revealing the power of green leafy vegetables: Cultivating diversity for health, environmental benefits, and sustainability Do diverse crops or diverse market purchases matter more for women's diet quality in farm households of Mali? How to monitor the ‘success’ of agricultural sustainability: A perspective Defining and measuring policy coherence for food system transformation: A scoping review Resilient and inclusive rural transformation in sub-Saharan Africa under climate, demographic, and social change: Challenges and opportunities for income growth and job creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1