稿件被拒的经验——来自JME副主编的思考

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Management Education Pub Date : 2022-06-13 DOI:10.1177/10525629221104231
Marissa S. Edwards, J. Leigh
{"title":"稿件被拒的经验——来自JME副主编的思考","authors":"Marissa S. Edwards, J. Leigh","doi":"10.1177/10525629221104231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manuscript rejection is a common and often unpleasant experience for academics, and management education scholars are no exception. With many business schools globally demanding that faculty focus on publishing in toptier journals, many of which have very low acceptance rates, most of us spend our time writing manuscripts that are rejected at some point in time. Of course, this is not a new phenomenon. More than two decades ago Ashkanasy (2010) argued in an editorial that journal rejection rates in the field of management were increasing and that journal editors (and reviewers) were becoming more demanding, especially in terms of methodological rigor and impact. On a similar point, Day (2011) observed in an AMLE essay that those who experience manuscript rejection represent “the silent majority” and noted further that rejection can negatively impact outcomes including creativity, professional satisfaction, and productivity. In our experience, it is still rare to find colleagues who openly discuss their experiences with rejection, at least outside of settings such as performance reviews. Yet sharing such stories can be both important and cathartic. In this respect, Jaremka et al. (2020, p. 520) discussed their experiences putting together a symposium at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology’s (SPSP’s) annual conference in which scholars shared how they","PeriodicalId":47308,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Education","volume":"46 1","pages":"611 - 621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Experience of Manuscript Rejection: Insights From the JME Associate Editors\",\"authors\":\"Marissa S. Edwards, J. Leigh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10525629221104231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Manuscript rejection is a common and often unpleasant experience for academics, and management education scholars are no exception. With many business schools globally demanding that faculty focus on publishing in toptier journals, many of which have very low acceptance rates, most of us spend our time writing manuscripts that are rejected at some point in time. Of course, this is not a new phenomenon. More than two decades ago Ashkanasy (2010) argued in an editorial that journal rejection rates in the field of management were increasing and that journal editors (and reviewers) were becoming more demanding, especially in terms of methodological rigor and impact. On a similar point, Day (2011) observed in an AMLE essay that those who experience manuscript rejection represent “the silent majority” and noted further that rejection can negatively impact outcomes including creativity, professional satisfaction, and productivity. In our experience, it is still rare to find colleagues who openly discuss their experiences with rejection, at least outside of settings such as performance reviews. Yet sharing such stories can be both important and cathartic. In this respect, Jaremka et al. (2020, p. 520) discussed their experiences putting together a symposium at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology’s (SPSP’s) annual conference in which scholars shared how they\",\"PeriodicalId\":47308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management Education\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"611 - 621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629221104231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629221104231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

手稿被拒是学术界常见且经常令人不快的经历,管理教育学者也不例外。由于全球许多商学院要求教师专注于在顶级期刊上发表文章,其中许多期刊的接受率非常低,我们大多数人都会花时间写在某些时候被拒绝的手稿上。当然,这并不是一个新现象。20多年前,Ashkanasy(2010)在一篇社论中认为,管理领域的期刊拒绝率正在上升,期刊编辑(和审稿人)的要求越来越高,尤其是在方法的严谨性和影响力方面。在类似的问题上,戴(2011)在AMLE的一篇文章中观察到,那些经历过稿件被拒的人代表了“沉默的大多数”,并进一步指出,被拒会对结果产生负面影响,包括创造力、职业满意度和生产力。根据我们的经验,很少有同事公开讨论自己被拒绝的经历,至少在绩效评估等环境之外是这样。然而,分享这样的故事既重要又能宣泄情绪。在这方面,Jaremka等人(2020,第520页)在人格与社会心理学学会(SPSP)年会上讨论了他们的经历,学者们在会上分享了他们是如何
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Experience of Manuscript Rejection: Insights From the JME Associate Editors
Manuscript rejection is a common and often unpleasant experience for academics, and management education scholars are no exception. With many business schools globally demanding that faculty focus on publishing in toptier journals, many of which have very low acceptance rates, most of us spend our time writing manuscripts that are rejected at some point in time. Of course, this is not a new phenomenon. More than two decades ago Ashkanasy (2010) argued in an editorial that journal rejection rates in the field of management were increasing and that journal editors (and reviewers) were becoming more demanding, especially in terms of methodological rigor and impact. On a similar point, Day (2011) observed in an AMLE essay that those who experience manuscript rejection represent “the silent majority” and noted further that rejection can negatively impact outcomes including creativity, professional satisfaction, and productivity. In our experience, it is still rare to find colleagues who openly discuss their experiences with rejection, at least outside of settings such as performance reviews. Yet sharing such stories can be both important and cathartic. In this respect, Jaremka et al. (2020, p. 520) discussed their experiences putting together a symposium at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology’s (SPSP’s) annual conference in which scholars shared how they
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Management Education
Journal of Management Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Education (JME) encourages contributions that respond to important issues in management education. The overriding question that guides the journal’s double-blind peer review process is: Will this contribution have a significant impact on thinking and/or practice in management education? Contributions may be either conceptual or empirical in nature, and are welcomed from any topic area and any country so long as their primary focus is on learning and/or teaching issues in management or organization studies. Although our core areas of interest are organizational behavior and management, we are also interested in teaching and learning developments in related domains such as human resource management & labor relations, social issues in management, critical management studies, diversity, ethics, organizational development, production and operations, sustainability, etc. We are open to all approaches to scholarly inquiry that form the basis for high quality knowledge creation and dissemination within management teaching and learning.
期刊最新文献
Teaching to Save the Planet: The Challenges Ahead for Instructors, Business Schools, and Universities Supporting Authors During the Writing Process: JME’s Online Manuscript Development Workshops Classroom Leadership Roles Activity: A Pathway to Sharing Leadership With Student Teams Exploring the Impact of ChatGPT on Business School Education: Prospects, Boundaries, and Paradoxes The Curvilinear Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Roles of Entrepreneurial Passion and Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1