《百万富翁修正案的失落历史

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Election Law Journal Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.1089/ELJ.2016.0423

ShawKatherine

{"title":"《百万富翁修正案的失落历史","authors":"ShawKatherine","doi":"10.1089/ELJ.2016.0423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This piece excavates the history of the Millionaire's Amendment, a short-lived provision of campaign finance law that played a significant role in Barack Obama's successful 2004 Senate campaign. It argues that beyond the Amendment's role in that single, fateful race, it supplies a useful test case for examining competing paradigms for regulating money in politics.","PeriodicalId":45644,"journal":{"name":"Election Law Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"172-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/ELJ.2016.0423","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lost History of the Millionaire's Amendment\",\"authors\":\"ShawKatherine\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ELJ.2016.0423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This piece excavates the history of the Millionaire's Amendment, a short-lived provision of campaign finance law that played a significant role in Barack Obama's successful 2004 Senate campaign. It argues that beyond the Amendment's role in that single, fateful race, it supplies a useful test case for examining competing paradigms for regulating money in politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Election Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"172-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/ELJ.2016.0423\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Election Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ELJ.2016.0423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Election Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ELJ.2016.0423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要这篇文章挖掘了《百万富翁修正案》的历史，这是竞选资金法中一项短暂的条款，在巴拉克·奥巴马2004年成功的参议院竞选中发挥了重要作用。它认为，除了修正案在这场单一的、决定性的种族中的作用之外，它还为研究政治中监管金钱的竞争范式提供了一个有用的测试案例。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The Lost History of the Millionaire's Amendment

Abstract This piece excavates the history of the Millionaire's Amendment, a short-lived provision of campaign finance law that played a significant role in Barack Obama's successful 2004 Senate campaign. It argues that beyond the Amendment's role in that single, fateful race, it supplies a useful test case for examining competing paradigms for regulating money in politics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Election Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

16.70%

发文量