七国集团的研发强度和收入不平等:1870–2016

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Scottish Journal of Political Economy Pub Date : 2021-09-06 DOI:10.1111/SJPE.12298
S. A. Churchill, B. Peng, R. Smyth, Quanda Zhang
{"title":"七国集团的研发强度和收入不平等:1870–2016","authors":"S. A. Churchill, B. Peng, R. Smyth, Quanda Zhang","doi":"10.1111/SJPE.12298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine how research and development (R&D) has contributed to income inequality in the Group of Seven (G7) countries from 1870 to 2016. Using newly developed panel data models that incorporate interactive fixed effects, we find that R&D is negatively associated with income inequality. Non-parametric models that allow us to capture the time-varying effect of R&D suggest that this average effect has been negative for most of this period. We find that legal origin moderates the relationship between R&D and income inequality and that the relationship is stronger for common law countries. We also examine three channels through which R&D could affect income inequality – economic growth, trade and employment – and find that economic growth and trade are mechanisms through which R&D transmits to income inequality. Of these two mediators, we find that the negative relationship between R&D and income inequality is mainly channelling through economic growth.","PeriodicalId":47171,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Journal of Political Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/SJPE.12298","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"R&D intensity and income inequality in the G7: 1870–2016\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Churchill, B. Peng, R. Smyth, Quanda Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/SJPE.12298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine how research and development (R&D) has contributed to income inequality in the Group of Seven (G7) countries from 1870 to 2016. Using newly developed panel data models that incorporate interactive fixed effects, we find that R&D is negatively associated with income inequality. Non-parametric models that allow us to capture the time-varying effect of R&D suggest that this average effect has been negative for most of this period. We find that legal origin moderates the relationship between R&D and income inequality and that the relationship is stronger for common law countries. We also examine three channels through which R&D could affect income inequality – economic growth, trade and employment – and find that economic growth and trade are mechanisms through which R&D transmits to income inequality. Of these two mediators, we find that the negative relationship between R&D and income inequality is mainly channelling through economic growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scottish Journal of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/SJPE.12298\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scottish Journal of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/SJPE.12298\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/SJPE.12298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们研究了1870年至2016年七国集团(G7)国家的研究与开发(R&D)是如何导致收入不平等的。利用新建立的包含交互固定效应的面板数据模型,我们发现研发与收入不平等呈负相关。非参数模型允许我们捕捉研发的时变效应,表明这一平均效应在这一时期的大部分时间里都是负的。研究发现,法律渊源调节了研发与收入不平等之间的关系,且这种关系在普通法国家更为明显。我们还考察了研发影响收入不平等的三个渠道——经济增长、贸易和就业——并发现经济增长和贸易是研发传导到收入不平等的机制。在这两个中介中,我们发现研发与收入不平等之间的负相关关系主要通过经济增长传导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R&D intensity and income inequality in the G7: 1870–2016
We examine how research and development (R&D) has contributed to income inequality in the Group of Seven (G7) countries from 1870 to 2016. Using newly developed panel data models that incorporate interactive fixed effects, we find that R&D is negatively associated with income inequality. Non-parametric models that allow us to capture the time-varying effect of R&D suggest that this average effect has been negative for most of this period. We find that legal origin moderates the relationship between R&D and income inequality and that the relationship is stronger for common law countries. We also examine three channels through which R&D could affect income inequality – economic growth, trade and employment – and find that economic growth and trade are mechanisms through which R&D transmits to income inequality. Of these two mediators, we find that the negative relationship between R&D and income inequality is mainly channelling through economic growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Scottish Journal of Political Economy is a generalist journal with an explicitly international reach in both readership and authorship. It is dedicated to publishing the highest quality research in any field of economics, without prejudice to the methodology or to the analytical techniques used. The editors encourage submissions in all fields of economics in order to provide practical contributions to the literature, and to further the influence of economics in the world of practical affairs.
期刊最新文献
Corporate influence, conservative “model bills,” and state economic outcomes Does regime type matter for economic institutions in non‐democracies? The effect of inter vivos gift taxation on wealth inequality and economic growth Nonlinear effects of uncertainty shocks: State dependency and asymmetry Did dollarization help Ecuador?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1