公民科学家如何看待自己的角色和专业知识:公民科学项目中养蜂人视角的探索性研究

Q1 Multidisciplinary Citizen Science Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2023-06-19 DOI:10.5334/cstp.501
S. Bieszczad, Maximilian Fochler, R. Brodschneider
{"title":"公民科学家如何看待自己的角色和专业知识:公民科学项目中养蜂人视角的探索性研究","authors":"S. Bieszczad, Maximilian Fochler, R. Brodschneider","doi":"10.5334/cstp.501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mission and definition of citizen science are vividly debated. One of the crucial aspects contested is who has the agency to define it; another is how precise a definition can and should be and how much these definitions are reflective of the heterogeneity of practices and perspectives subsumed under the label citizen science. In this paper we draw attention to how citizens themselves actively construct their own roles within a project in relation to both their histories and the project’s scientists. Drawing on a set of in-depth interviews with participating Austrian beekeepers in the INSIGNIA project, we show how even within a small, relatively homogenous sample of participants, there is considerable diversity in how the citizen scientists see their roles. We explore how citizen scientists articulate a different set of relations towards science, their own practice as beekeepers, and their desired role in the project. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of our findings for academic reflection on citizen science as well as practical implementation for citizen science projects.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Citizen Scientists See their Own Role and Expertise: An Explorative Study of the Perspectives of Beekeepers in a Citizen Science Project\",\"authors\":\"S. Bieszczad, Maximilian Fochler, R. Brodschneider\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/cstp.501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mission and definition of citizen science are vividly debated. One of the crucial aspects contested is who has the agency to define it; another is how precise a definition can and should be and how much these definitions are reflective of the heterogeneity of practices and perspectives subsumed under the label citizen science. In this paper we draw attention to how citizens themselves actively construct their own roles within a project in relation to both their histories and the project’s scientists. Drawing on a set of in-depth interviews with participating Austrian beekeepers in the INSIGNIA project, we show how even within a small, relatively homogenous sample of participants, there is considerable diversity in how the citizen scientists see their roles. We explore how citizen scientists articulate a different set of relations towards science, their own practice as beekeepers, and their desired role in the project. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of our findings for academic reflection on citizen science as well as practical implementation for citizen science projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Citizen Science Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Citizen Science Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公民科学的使命和定义受到了生动的争论。争论的一个关键方面是谁有权定义它;另一个问题是,一个定义可以而且应该有多精确,以及这些定义在多大程度上反映了公民科学标签下的实践和观点的异质性。在这篇论文中,我们提请注意公民自己是如何根据他们的历史和项目的科学家,在项目中积极构建自己的角色的。根据对INSIGNIA项目中参与的奥地利养蜂人的一系列深入采访,我们展示了即使在一个相对同质的小样本中,公民科学家如何看待自己的角色也存在相当大的多样性。我们探讨了公民科学家如何阐明与科学的不同关系,他们自己作为养蜂人的实践,以及他们在项目中所期望的角色。最后,我们讨论了我们的发现对公民科学的学术反思以及公民科学项目的实际实施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Citizen Scientists See their Own Role and Expertise: An Explorative Study of the Perspectives of Beekeepers in a Citizen Science Project
The mission and definition of citizen science are vividly debated. One of the crucial aspects contested is who has the agency to define it; another is how precise a definition can and should be and how much these definitions are reflective of the heterogeneity of practices and perspectives subsumed under the label citizen science. In this paper we draw attention to how citizens themselves actively construct their own roles within a project in relation to both their histories and the project’s scientists. Drawing on a set of in-depth interviews with participating Austrian beekeepers in the INSIGNIA project, we show how even within a small, relatively homogenous sample of participants, there is considerable diversity in how the citizen scientists see their roles. We explore how citizen scientists articulate a different set of relations towards science, their own practice as beekeepers, and their desired role in the project. In conclusion, we discuss the implications of our findings for academic reflection on citizen science as well as practical implementation for citizen science projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
Citizen Science Theory and Practice Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Snap Decisions: Assessing Participation and Data Quality in a Citizen Science Program Using Repeat Photography Diversifying Large-Scale Participatory Science: The Efficacy of Engagement through Facilitator Organizations “Every Small Action Helps Towards the Greater Cause:” Online Communities Scaling Up Online Community-Led Citizen Science in Addressing Litter Challenges in Scotland Cross-Project Analysis of Volunteers’ Scientific Observation Skills Citizen Scientist Participation in Research on Private Lands Positively Impacts Multiple Conservation Behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1