预防性社会规划

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-10-26 DOI:10.1177/10911421221129310
J. Feigenbaum, Tong Jin
{"title":"预防性社会规划","authors":"J. Feigenbaum, Tong Jin","doi":"10.1177/10911421221129310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a truism of neoclassical economics that a sufficiently high savings rate will be bad if it is dynamically inefficient. Here we consider a Solow model in which households follow a savings rate dictated by a social planner. Ideally, the social planner would instruct households to save at the Golden Rule savings rate that maximizes consumption per capita, but this advice needs to be adjusted when the social planner has imperfect control over how much households actually save. Analogous to what happens with precautionary saving at the household level, in this case, the social planner will maximize social welfare by targeting a savings rate higher than the Golden Rule. Precautionary social planning then yields a dynamically inefficient allocation, albeit with greater stability of consumption, which is often a stated priority of social planners.","PeriodicalId":46919,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW","volume":"51 1","pages":"44 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precautionary Social Planning\",\"authors\":\"J. Feigenbaum, Tong Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10911421221129310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a truism of neoclassical economics that a sufficiently high savings rate will be bad if it is dynamically inefficient. Here we consider a Solow model in which households follow a savings rate dictated by a social planner. Ideally, the social planner would instruct households to save at the Golden Rule savings rate that maximizes consumption per capita, but this advice needs to be adjusted when the social planner has imperfect control over how much households actually save. Analogous to what happens with precautionary saving at the household level, in this case, the social planner will maximize social welfare by targeting a savings rate higher than the Golden Rule. Precautionary social planning then yields a dynamically inefficient allocation, albeit with greater stability of consumption, which is often a stated priority of social planners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221129310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221129310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新古典经济学的一个真理是,如果储蓄率在动态上效率低下,那么足够高的储蓄率将是糟糕的。在这里,我们考虑一个索洛模型,其中家庭遵循社会规划师规定的储蓄率。理想情况下,社会规划师会指示家庭以最大化人均消费的黄金法则储蓄率储蓄,但当社会规划师对家庭实际储蓄量的控制不完善时,需要调整这一建议。类似于家庭层面的预防性储蓄,在这种情况下,社会规划师将通过设定高于黄金法则的储蓄率来最大限度地提高社会福利。预防性社会规划会产生动态低效的分配,尽管消费更稳定,这通常是社会规划者的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Precautionary Social Planning
It is a truism of neoclassical economics that a sufficiently high savings rate will be bad if it is dynamically inefficient. Here we consider a Solow model in which households follow a savings rate dictated by a social planner. Ideally, the social planner would instruct households to save at the Golden Rule savings rate that maximizes consumption per capita, but this advice needs to be adjusted when the social planner has imperfect control over how much households actually save. Analogous to what happens with precautionary saving at the household level, in this case, the social planner will maximize social welfare by targeting a savings rate higher than the Golden Rule. Precautionary social planning then yields a dynamically inefficient allocation, albeit with greater stability of consumption, which is often a stated priority of social planners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Public Finance Review is a professional forum devoted to US policy-oriented economic research and theory, which focuses on a variety of allocation, distribution and stabilization functions within the public-sector economy. Economists, policy makers, political scientists, and researchers all rely on Public Finance Review, to bring them the most up-to-date information on the ever changing US public finance system, and to help them put policies and research into action. Public Finance Review not only presents rigorous empirical and theoretical papers on public economic policies, but also examines and critiques their impact and consequences. The journal analyzes the nature and function of evolving US governmental fiscal policies at the national, state and local levels.
期刊最新文献
A Double Negative: Capitalizing on Assessment Regressivity Fiscal Incidence of the Property Tax Does Smaller Government Mean Less Corruption? Can the Federal Budget Process Promote Fiscal Sustainability? Evidence from the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 Optimal Social Security with Loss Aversion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1