Gardner指数方程用于表示导水率曲线的扩展:包含大孔隙流动效应

IF 3.1 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Hydrology X Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.hydroa.2023.100155
Theophilo Benedicto Ottoni Filho , Anderson Rodrigues Caetano , Marta Vasconcelos Ottoni
{"title":"Gardner指数方程用于表示导水率曲线的扩展:包含大孔隙流动效应","authors":"Theophilo Benedicto Ottoni Filho ,&nbsp;Anderson Rodrigues Caetano ,&nbsp;Marta Vasconcelos Ottoni","doi":"10.1016/j.hydroa.2023.100155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In soil hydraulics, it is crucial to establish an accurate representation of the relative hydraulic conductive curve (rHCC), K_r(h). This paper proposes a simple way to determine K_r(h), called the Modified Gardner Dual model (MGD), using a logarithmic extension of the classical Gardner exponential representation and including macropore flow effects. MGD has five parameters which are hydraulic constants clearly identified in the bilogarithmic representation of K_r(h). Two of them are related to the main inflection point coordinates of rHCC; from them, it is possible to determine the macroscopic capillary length of the infiltration theory. The model was tested in the suction interval 0 &lt; <em>h</em> &lt; 15,000 cm with a total of 249 soil samples from two databases, and employing a flexible representation of the Mualem-van Genuchten (MVG) equation as a reference. Using the RMSE statistics (with log base) to measure the fitting errors, we obtained a 31% reduction in errors (RMSE_MGD = 0.27, RMSE_MVG = 0.39). In 74% of the soils, including samples from the two databases, the reduction was 53% (RMSE_MGD = 0.19, RMSE_MVG = 0.40); the rHCC data fitting of this group was accurate over all the suction h intervals, with RMSE_MGD &lt; 0.32 in each soil sample. In the remaining 26% of the samples, the quality of the MGD fitting degraded due mainly to the presence of multiple rHCC data inflection points. Therefore, in soils without this structural peculiarity, the proposed model revealed to be quite accurate in addition to being analytically simple. Another advantage of MGD is that its parameters depend mainly on the data with h around and lower than the main inflection suction value, which, in turn, never exceeded the 300-cm limit in this study. Hence, in soils that do not have multiple inflections, the extrapolations of the model in drier intervals (1000 cm &lt; h &lt; 15,000 cm) are reliable. The MGD parameter optimization software has been called KUNSAT. It is available in the Supplementary Material or from the corresponding author on request.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology X","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extension of the Gardner exponential equation to represent the hydraulic conductivity curve: Inclusion of macropore flow effects\",\"authors\":\"Theophilo Benedicto Ottoni Filho ,&nbsp;Anderson Rodrigues Caetano ,&nbsp;Marta Vasconcelos Ottoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hydroa.2023.100155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In soil hydraulics, it is crucial to establish an accurate representation of the relative hydraulic conductive curve (rHCC), K_r(h). This paper proposes a simple way to determine K_r(h), called the Modified Gardner Dual model (MGD), using a logarithmic extension of the classical Gardner exponential representation and including macropore flow effects. MGD has five parameters which are hydraulic constants clearly identified in the bilogarithmic representation of K_r(h). Two of them are related to the main inflection point coordinates of rHCC; from them, it is possible to determine the macroscopic capillary length of the infiltration theory. The model was tested in the suction interval 0 &lt; <em>h</em> &lt; 15,000 cm with a total of 249 soil samples from two databases, and employing a flexible representation of the Mualem-van Genuchten (MVG) equation as a reference. Using the RMSE statistics (with log base) to measure the fitting errors, we obtained a 31% reduction in errors (RMSE_MGD = 0.27, RMSE_MVG = 0.39). In 74% of the soils, including samples from the two databases, the reduction was 53% (RMSE_MGD = 0.19, RMSE_MVG = 0.40); the rHCC data fitting of this group was accurate over all the suction h intervals, with RMSE_MGD &lt; 0.32 in each soil sample. In the remaining 26% of the samples, the quality of the MGD fitting degraded due mainly to the presence of multiple rHCC data inflection points. Therefore, in soils without this structural peculiarity, the proposed model revealed to be quite accurate in addition to being analytically simple. Another advantage of MGD is that its parameters depend mainly on the data with h around and lower than the main inflection suction value, which, in turn, never exceeded the 300-cm limit in this study. Hence, in soils that do not have multiple inflections, the extrapolations of the model in drier intervals (1000 cm &lt; h &lt; 15,000 cm) are reliable. The MGD parameter optimization software has been called KUNSAT. It is available in the Supplementary Material or from the corresponding author on request.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology X\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915523000081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915523000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在土壤水力学中,建立相对水力传导曲线(rHCC) K_r(h)的精确表示是至关重要的。本文提出了一种简单的方法来确定K_r(h),称为修正加德纳双模型(MGD),使用经典加德纳指数表示的对数扩展,并包括大孔流动效应。MGD有5个参数,它们是在K_r(h)的双对数表示中明确确定的水力常数。其中两个与rHCC的主拐点坐标有关;由此可以确定渗透理论的宏观毛细长度。在吸力区间0 <下对模型进行了试验;h & lt;从两个数据库中选取249个土壤样本,并采用Mualem-van Genuchten (MVG)方程的灵活表示作为参考。使用RMSE统计量(log base)来测量拟合误差,我们获得了31%的误差减少(RMSE_MGD = 0.27, RMSE_MVG = 0.39)。在74%的土壤中,包括来自两个数据库的样本,减少了53% (RMSE_MGD = 0.19, RMSE_MVG = 0.40);本组rHCC数据在所有吸痰h区间拟合准确,RMSE_MGD <每个土壤样品0.32。在其余26%的样本中,由于存在多个rHCC数据拐点,MGD拟合的质量下降。因此,在没有这种结构特性的土壤中,所提出的模型除了解析简单外,还显示出相当准确。MGD的另一个优点是其参数主要依赖于h左右且小于主弯吸力值的数据,而在本研究中,主弯吸力值从未超过300 cm的限制。因此,在没有多重折弯的土壤中,模型在干燥间隔(1000 cm <h & lt;15,000 cm)是可靠的。MGD参数优化软件被称为KUNSAT。它可以在补充材料中获得,也可以根据要求从通讯作者处获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extension of the Gardner exponential equation to represent the hydraulic conductivity curve: Inclusion of macropore flow effects

In soil hydraulics, it is crucial to establish an accurate representation of the relative hydraulic conductive curve (rHCC), K_r(h). This paper proposes a simple way to determine K_r(h), called the Modified Gardner Dual model (MGD), using a logarithmic extension of the classical Gardner exponential representation and including macropore flow effects. MGD has five parameters which are hydraulic constants clearly identified in the bilogarithmic representation of K_r(h). Two of them are related to the main inflection point coordinates of rHCC; from them, it is possible to determine the macroscopic capillary length of the infiltration theory. The model was tested in the suction interval 0 < h < 15,000 cm with a total of 249 soil samples from two databases, and employing a flexible representation of the Mualem-van Genuchten (MVG) equation as a reference. Using the RMSE statistics (with log base) to measure the fitting errors, we obtained a 31% reduction in errors (RMSE_MGD = 0.27, RMSE_MVG = 0.39). In 74% of the soils, including samples from the two databases, the reduction was 53% (RMSE_MGD = 0.19, RMSE_MVG = 0.40); the rHCC data fitting of this group was accurate over all the suction h intervals, with RMSE_MGD < 0.32 in each soil sample. In the remaining 26% of the samples, the quality of the MGD fitting degraded due mainly to the presence of multiple rHCC data inflection points. Therefore, in soils without this structural peculiarity, the proposed model revealed to be quite accurate in addition to being analytically simple. Another advantage of MGD is that its parameters depend mainly on the data with h around and lower than the main inflection suction value, which, in turn, never exceeded the 300-cm limit in this study. Hence, in soils that do not have multiple inflections, the extrapolations of the model in drier intervals (1000 cm < h < 15,000 cm) are reliable. The MGD parameter optimization software has been called KUNSAT. It is available in the Supplementary Material or from the corresponding author on request.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology X
Journal of Hydrology X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Revisiting model complexity: Space-time correction of high dimensional variable sets in climate model simulations Quantifying the economic value of a national hydrometric network for households Private sensors and crowdsourced rainfall data: Accuracy and potential for modelling pluvial flooding in urban areas of Oslo, Norway A combined data assimilation and deep learning approach for continuous spatio-temporal SWE reconstruction from sparse ground tracks A nonstationary stochastic simulator for clustered regional hydroclimatic extremes to Characterize compound flood risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1