PISA阅读素养评估和高中阅读素养评估:它们有何不同?

M. Zaim, Refnaldi Refnaldi, Y. Zainil, Fiona Ramadhani
{"title":"PISA阅读素养评估和高中阅读素养评估:它们有何不同?","authors":"M. Zaim, Refnaldi Refnaldi, Y. Zainil, Fiona Ramadhani","doi":"10.24036/00466za0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an international program assessment to evaluate and determine the education system's effectiveness by focusing on reading, mathematics, and science. This study aims to analyze the differences between PISA reading literacy assessment and senior high school reading literacy assessment in West Sumatera. Reading literacy is abilities and skills in reading needed in everyday life to develop students' knowledge and potential. The method of this study was comparative method. Data were taken from PISA reading literacy 2018, which OECD published, and reading tests made by English teachers from ten Senior High Schools in West Sumatera. In addition, this study used document analysis to collect the data. The differences between PISA reading literacy assessment and reading literacy assessment at senior high school were seen from eight indicators: cognitive process, form of text, types of text, form of test, situation, types of question, level of question, text medium, and text environment. It was found that PISA reading literacy assessment was more complex compared to reading literacy assessment at senior high school.","PeriodicalId":33319,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PISA reading literacy assessment and senior high school reading literacy assessments: How do they differ?\",\"authors\":\"M. Zaim, Refnaldi Refnaldi, Y. Zainil, Fiona Ramadhani\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/00466za0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an international program assessment to evaluate and determine the education system's effectiveness by focusing on reading, mathematics, and science. This study aims to analyze the differences between PISA reading literacy assessment and senior high school reading literacy assessment in West Sumatera. Reading literacy is abilities and skills in reading needed in everyday life to develop students' knowledge and potential. The method of this study was comparative method. Data were taken from PISA reading literacy 2018, which OECD published, and reading tests made by English teachers from ten Senior High Schools in West Sumatera. In addition, this study used document analysis to collect the data. The differences between PISA reading literacy assessment and reading literacy assessment at senior high school were seen from eight indicators: cognitive process, form of text, types of text, form of test, situation, types of question, level of question, text medium, and text environment. It was found that PISA reading literacy assessment was more complex compared to reading literacy assessment at senior high school.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/00466za0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/00466za0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国际学生评估项目(PISA)是一项国际项目评估,旨在通过关注阅读、数学和科学来评估和确定教育系统的有效性。本研究旨在分析PISA阅读素养评估与西苏门答腊高中阅读素养评估之间的差异。阅读素养是日常生活中培养学生知识和潜力所需的阅读能力和技能。本研究采用比较法。数据来自经合组织发布的2018年PISA阅读素养,以及西苏门答腊十所高中的英语教师进行的阅读测试。此外,本研究采用文献分析法收集数据。从认知过程、语篇形式、语篇类型、测试形式、情境、题型、题型水平、语篇媒介和语篇环境8个指标可以看出PISA阅读素养评估与高中阅读素养评估的差异。研究发现,与高中阶段的阅读素养评估相比,PISA阅读素养评估更为复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PISA reading literacy assessment and senior high school reading literacy assessments: How do they differ?
The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is an international program assessment to evaluate and determine the education system's effectiveness by focusing on reading, mathematics, and science. This study aims to analyze the differences between PISA reading literacy assessment and senior high school reading literacy assessment in West Sumatera. Reading literacy is abilities and skills in reading needed in everyday life to develop students' knowledge and potential. The method of this study was comparative method. Data were taken from PISA reading literacy 2018, which OECD published, and reading tests made by English teachers from ten Senior High Schools in West Sumatera. In addition, this study used document analysis to collect the data. The differences between PISA reading literacy assessment and reading literacy assessment at senior high school were seen from eight indicators: cognitive process, form of text, types of text, form of test, situation, types of question, level of question, text medium, and text environment. It was found that PISA reading literacy assessment was more complex compared to reading literacy assessment at senior high school.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of marital status and qualifications on the dangers of psychological work of plant science and science education lecturers Developing the Adolescent Career Success Instrument (ACSI): A Rasch Model analysis Comparison of the impact of the learning system during the COVID-19 Pandemic in several countries and Indonesia The development and validation of Indonesian Hope Scale (IHS): A Rasch model analysis Health education of Covid-19 vaccination program for tourism industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1