DevOps本体——一个支持学术界和软件行业对DevOps理解的本体

César J. Pardo, Carlos Orozco, Jonathan Guerrero
{"title":"DevOps本体——一个支持学术界和软件行业对DevOps理解的本体","authors":"César J. Pardo, Carlos Orozco, Jonathan Guerrero","doi":"10.21533/pen.v11i2.3474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the degree of knowledge about what DevOps really means and what it entails is still limited. This can result in an informal and even incorrect implementation in many cases. Although several proposals related to DevOps adoption can be found, confusion is not uncommon and terminology conflict between the proposals is still evident. This article proposes DevOps Ontology, a semi-formal ontology that proposes a generic, consistent, and clear language to enable the dissemination of information related to implementing DevOps in software development. The ontology presented in this article facilitates the understanding of DevOps by identifying the relationships between software process elements and the agile principles/values that may be related to them. The DevOps Ontology has been defined considering the following aspects: the REFSENO formalism that uses the representation in UML was used and the language OWL language using Prótegé and HermiT Reasoner to evaluate the consistency of its structure. Likewise, it was satisfactorily evaluated in three application cases: a theoretical validation; instantiation of the continuous integration and deployment practices proposed by the company GitLab. Furthermore, a mobile app was created to retrieve information from the DevOps Ontology using the SPARQL protocol and RDF language. The app also evaluated the Ontology’s proficiency in responding to knowledge-based questions using SPARQL. The results showed that DevOps Ontology is consistent, complete, and concise, i.e.: to say: the consistency could be observed in the ability to be able to infer knowledge from the ontology, ensuring that the ontology is complete by checking for any incompleteness and verifying that all necessary definitions and inferences are well-established. Additionally, the ontology was assessed for conciseness to ensure that it doesn't contain redundant or unnecessary definitions. Furthermore, it has the potential for improvement by incorporating new concepts and relationships as needed. The newly suggested ontology creates a set of terms that provide a systematic and structured approach to organizing the existing knowledge in the field. This helps to minimize the confusion, inconsistency, and heterogeneity of the terminologies and concepts in the area of interest.","PeriodicalId":37519,"journal":{"name":"Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DevOps Ontology - An ontology to support the understanding of DevOps in the academy and the software industry\",\"authors\":\"César J. Pardo, Carlos Orozco, Jonathan Guerrero\",\"doi\":\"10.21533/pen.v11i2.3474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, the degree of knowledge about what DevOps really means and what it entails is still limited. This can result in an informal and even incorrect implementation in many cases. Although several proposals related to DevOps adoption can be found, confusion is not uncommon and terminology conflict between the proposals is still evident. This article proposes DevOps Ontology, a semi-formal ontology that proposes a generic, consistent, and clear language to enable the dissemination of information related to implementing DevOps in software development. The ontology presented in this article facilitates the understanding of DevOps by identifying the relationships between software process elements and the agile principles/values that may be related to them. The DevOps Ontology has been defined considering the following aspects: the REFSENO formalism that uses the representation in UML was used and the language OWL language using Prótegé and HermiT Reasoner to evaluate the consistency of its structure. Likewise, it was satisfactorily evaluated in three application cases: a theoretical validation; instantiation of the continuous integration and deployment practices proposed by the company GitLab. Furthermore, a mobile app was created to retrieve information from the DevOps Ontology using the SPARQL protocol and RDF language. The app also evaluated the Ontology’s proficiency in responding to knowledge-based questions using SPARQL. The results showed that DevOps Ontology is consistent, complete, and concise, i.e.: to say: the consistency could be observed in the ability to be able to infer knowledge from the ontology, ensuring that the ontology is complete by checking for any incompleteness and verifying that all necessary definitions and inferences are well-established. Additionally, the ontology was assessed for conciseness to ensure that it doesn't contain redundant or unnecessary definitions. Furthermore, it has the potential for improvement by incorporating new concepts and relationships as needed. The newly suggested ontology creates a set of terms that provide a systematic and structured approach to organizing the existing knowledge in the field. This helps to minimize the confusion, inconsistency, and heterogeneity of the terminologies and concepts in the area of interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i2.3474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i2.3474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,对DevOps的真正含义及其所需内容的了解程度仍然有限。在许多情况下,这可能导致非正式甚至不正确的实施。尽管可以找到几个与DevOps采用相关的提案,但混淆并不罕见,提案之间的术语冲突仍然很明显。本文提出了DevOps本体论,这是一个半形式本体论,它提出了一种通用、一致和清晰的语言,以实现与在软件开发中实现DevOps相关的信息传播。本文中提出的本体通过识别软件过程元素与可能与其相关的敏捷原则/价值观之间的关系,促进了对DevOps的理解。DevOps本体论的定义考虑了以下几个方面:使用了使用UML表示的REFSENO形式主义,以及使用Prótegé和HermiT Reasoner来评估其结构一致性的OWL语言。同样,它在三个应用案例中得到了令人满意的评价:理论验证;GitLab公司提出的持续集成和部署实践的实例化。此外,还创建了一个移动应用程序,使用SPARQL协议和RDF语言从DevOps本体检索信息。该应用程序还评估了本体在使用SPARQL回答基于知识的问题方面的熟练程度。结果表明,DevOps本体是一致、完整和简洁的,即:可以在能够从本体推断知识的能力上观察到一致性,通过检查任何不完整性并验证所有必要的定义和推断都是成立的来确保本体是完整的。此外,还评估了本体的简洁性,以确保它不包含冗余或不必要的定义。此外,它有可能通过根据需要纳入新的概念和关系来加以改进。新提出的本体创建了一组术语,为组织该领域的现有知识提供了系统和结构化的方法。这有助于最大限度地减少感兴趣领域中术语和概念的混淆、不一致和异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DevOps Ontology - An ontology to support the understanding of DevOps in the academy and the software industry
Currently, the degree of knowledge about what DevOps really means and what it entails is still limited. This can result in an informal and even incorrect implementation in many cases. Although several proposals related to DevOps adoption can be found, confusion is not uncommon and terminology conflict between the proposals is still evident. This article proposes DevOps Ontology, a semi-formal ontology that proposes a generic, consistent, and clear language to enable the dissemination of information related to implementing DevOps in software development. The ontology presented in this article facilitates the understanding of DevOps by identifying the relationships between software process elements and the agile principles/values that may be related to them. The DevOps Ontology has been defined considering the following aspects: the REFSENO formalism that uses the representation in UML was used and the language OWL language using Prótegé and HermiT Reasoner to evaluate the consistency of its structure. Likewise, it was satisfactorily evaluated in three application cases: a theoretical validation; instantiation of the continuous integration and deployment practices proposed by the company GitLab. Furthermore, a mobile app was created to retrieve information from the DevOps Ontology using the SPARQL protocol and RDF language. The app also evaluated the Ontology’s proficiency in responding to knowledge-based questions using SPARQL. The results showed that DevOps Ontology is consistent, complete, and concise, i.e.: to say: the consistency could be observed in the ability to be able to infer knowledge from the ontology, ensuring that the ontology is complete by checking for any incompleteness and verifying that all necessary definitions and inferences are well-established. Additionally, the ontology was assessed for conciseness to ensure that it doesn't contain redundant or unnecessary definitions. Furthermore, it has the potential for improvement by incorporating new concepts and relationships as needed. The newly suggested ontology creates a set of terms that provide a systematic and structured approach to organizing the existing knowledge in the field. This helps to minimize the confusion, inconsistency, and heterogeneity of the terminologies and concepts in the area of interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: *Industrial Engineering: 1 . Ergonomics 2 . Manufacturing 3 . TQM/quality engineering, reliability/maintenance engineering 4 . Production Planning 5 . Facility location, layout, design, materials handling 6 . Education, case studies 7 . Inventory, logistics, transportation, supply chain management 8 . Management 9 . Project/operations management, scheduling 10 . Information systems for production and management 11 . Innovation, knowledge management, organizational learning *Mechanical Engineering: 1 . Energy 2 . Machine Design 3 . Engineering Materials 4 . Manufacturing 5 . Mechatronics & Robotics 6 . Transportation 7 . Fluid Mechanics 8 . Optical Engineering 9 . Nanotechnology 10 . Maintenance & Safety *Computer Science: 1 . Computational Intelligence 2 . Computer Graphics 3 . Data Mining 4 . Human-Centered Computing 5 . Internet and Web Computing 6 . Mobile and Cloud computing 7 . Software Engineering 8 . Online Social Networks *Electrical and electronics engineering 1 . Sensor, automation and instrumentation technology 2 . Telecommunications 3 . Power systems 4 . Electronics 5 . Nanotechnology *Architecture: 1 . Advanced digital applications in architecture practice and computation within Generative processes of design 2 . Computer science, biology and ecology connected with structural engineering 3 . Technology and sustainability in architecture *Bioengineering: 1 . Medical Sciences 2 . Biological and Biomedical Sciences 3 . Agriculture and Life Sciences 4 . Biology and neuroscience 5 . Biological Sciences (Botany, Forestry, Cell Biology, Marine Biology, Zoology) [...]
期刊最新文献
First Morphological and Genetic Record and Confirmation of Korean Rockfish Sebastes schlegelii Hilgendorf, 1880 in the Black Sea Coast of Türkiye Conducting Polymer Films on Zn Deposited Carbon Electrode The Genotoxic Damage in Cyprinus carpio Exposed to Abamectin A low-cost podoscope for extracting morphological features of the foot Investigation of Groundwater Zooplankton Fauna from Water Wells in Kilis Province from Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1