征收之外的选择:中世纪欧洲和现代巴勒斯坦的地租、信贷和农民土地持有

IF 0.4 1区 历史学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Continuity and Change Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1017/S0268416021000199
P. Schofield
{"title":"征收之外的选择:中世纪欧洲和现代巴勒斯坦的地租、信贷和农民土地持有","authors":"P. Schofield","doi":"10.1017/S0268416021000199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essays in this edition address, for four periods and regions, the kinds of processes that could, in certain circumstances, have led to expropriation, that is the appropriation of land by wealthier parties and the enforced landlessness of former peasant landholders; however, in each instance presented here, the authors describe processes that did not in fact result in the forced and complete removal of peasant proprietors from their land. Instead, as three of the following articles show, namely those by Furio, Nadan and Schofield, a reduction in property rights could be as important an indicator of the expropriation of property rights as the more classical view of enforced landlessness and proletarianization. Furthermore, the sorts of conditions that might have led to expropriation or a reduction in property rights in certain contexts, did not necessarily result in any reduction in the pre-existing rights of peasant tenants, as is shown by Arnoux in his contribution to this edition. In all instances, the articles published here illustrate that those who might have chosen to expropriate, notably landlords, wealthier peasants, merchants and creditors, were not necessarily interested in appropriating peasant land. Rather, a regular receipt of rents was, most obviously, often as and more important in such contexts; as such, and again as will be explored in the following articles, these designs on peasant land typically led to a diminution of the property rights of the tenant but not their wholesale eviction from the land. This was not universally the case; in other parts of medieval Europe, to which reference will be made below, creditors sought out and expropriated the lands of their debtors. However, this was neither a universal process nor one that was dependent upon unique sets of prevailing conditions; instead, the persistence of, or introduction of, new institutional and economic structures and practices (such as seigneurial expectations, communal or familial convention, governmental legislation, the","PeriodicalId":45309,"journal":{"name":"Continuity and Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternatives to expropriation: rent, credit and peasant landholding in medieval Europe and modern Palestine\",\"authors\":\"P. Schofield\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0268416021000199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essays in this edition address, for four periods and regions, the kinds of processes that could, in certain circumstances, have led to expropriation, that is the appropriation of land by wealthier parties and the enforced landlessness of former peasant landholders; however, in each instance presented here, the authors describe processes that did not in fact result in the forced and complete removal of peasant proprietors from their land. Instead, as three of the following articles show, namely those by Furio, Nadan and Schofield, a reduction in property rights could be as important an indicator of the expropriation of property rights as the more classical view of enforced landlessness and proletarianization. Furthermore, the sorts of conditions that might have led to expropriation or a reduction in property rights in certain contexts, did not necessarily result in any reduction in the pre-existing rights of peasant tenants, as is shown by Arnoux in his contribution to this edition. In all instances, the articles published here illustrate that those who might have chosen to expropriate, notably landlords, wealthier peasants, merchants and creditors, were not necessarily interested in appropriating peasant land. Rather, a regular receipt of rents was, most obviously, often as and more important in such contexts; as such, and again as will be explored in the following articles, these designs on peasant land typically led to a diminution of the property rights of the tenant but not their wholesale eviction from the land. This was not universally the case; in other parts of medieval Europe, to which reference will be made below, creditors sought out and expropriated the lands of their debtors. However, this was neither a universal process nor one that was dependent upon unique sets of prevailing conditions; instead, the persistence of, or introduction of, new institutional and economic structures and practices (such as seigneurial expectations, communal or familial convention, governmental legislation, the\",\"PeriodicalId\":45309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continuity and Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continuity and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416021000199\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuity and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416021000199","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本版的文章在四个时期和地区论述了在某些情况下可能导致征用的各种过程,即富裕政党侵占土地和前农民土地所有者被迫无地;然而,在这里提出的每一个例子中,作者都描述了事实上并没有导致农民所有者被迫完全离开他们的土地的过程。相反,正如以下三篇文章,即Furio、Nadan和Schofield的文章所表明的那样,财产权的减少可能与强迫无地和无产阶级化的更经典观点一样,是财产权被征用的重要指标。此外,在某些情况下,可能导致财产权被征用或减少的各种条件并不一定会导致农民租户先前存在的权利减少,正如Arnoux在其对本版的贡献中所表明的那样。在所有情况下,这里发表的文章都表明,那些可能选择征用的人,特别是地主、富农、商人和债权人,不一定对征用农民土地感兴趣。相反,最明显的是,在这种情况下,定期收取租金往往更为重要;因此,正如将在以下文章中再次探讨的那样,这些农民土地上的设计通常会导致租户的产权减少,但不会导致他们被大规模驱逐出土地。并非普遍如此;在中世纪欧洲的其他地区(下文将提及),债权人寻找并征用了债务人的土地。然而,这既不是一个普遍的过程,也不是一个依赖于独特的普遍条件的过程;相反,坚持或引入新的制度和经济结构和做法(如贵族的期望、社区或家庭惯例、政府立法、
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alternatives to expropriation: rent, credit and peasant landholding in medieval Europe and modern Palestine
The essays in this edition address, for four periods and regions, the kinds of processes that could, in certain circumstances, have led to expropriation, that is the appropriation of land by wealthier parties and the enforced landlessness of former peasant landholders; however, in each instance presented here, the authors describe processes that did not in fact result in the forced and complete removal of peasant proprietors from their land. Instead, as three of the following articles show, namely those by Furio, Nadan and Schofield, a reduction in property rights could be as important an indicator of the expropriation of property rights as the more classical view of enforced landlessness and proletarianization. Furthermore, the sorts of conditions that might have led to expropriation or a reduction in property rights in certain contexts, did not necessarily result in any reduction in the pre-existing rights of peasant tenants, as is shown by Arnoux in his contribution to this edition. In all instances, the articles published here illustrate that those who might have chosen to expropriate, notably landlords, wealthier peasants, merchants and creditors, were not necessarily interested in appropriating peasant land. Rather, a regular receipt of rents was, most obviously, often as and more important in such contexts; as such, and again as will be explored in the following articles, these designs on peasant land typically led to a diminution of the property rights of the tenant but not their wholesale eviction from the land. This was not universally the case; in other parts of medieval Europe, to which reference will be made below, creditors sought out and expropriated the lands of their debtors. However, this was neither a universal process nor one that was dependent upon unique sets of prevailing conditions; instead, the persistence of, or introduction of, new institutional and economic structures and practices (such as seigneurial expectations, communal or familial convention, governmental legislation, the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Continuity and Change
Continuity and Change SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Continuity and Change aims to define a field of historical sociology concerned with long-term continuities and discontinuities in the structures of past societies. Emphasis is upon studies whose agenda or methodology combines elements from traditional fields such as history, sociology, law, demography, economics or anthropology, or ranges freely between them. There is a strong commitment to comparative studies over a broad range of cultures and time spans.
期刊最新文献
Mariana P. Candido, Wealth, Land, and Property in Angola. A History of Dispossession, Slavery and Inequality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022). Pages xiv + 323 + figures 17 + tables 12. F. Barry, Industry and Policy in Independent Ireland, 1922–1972 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023). Pages xiv + 232 + 65 tables. £49.00 hardback. Midwives’ oaths: everyday life and the law in seventeenth-century England D. Menjot, M. Caesar, F. Garnier and P. Verdés Pijuan (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Public Taxation in Medieval Europe (London and New York: Routledge, 2023). Pages xiv + 497. £152.00 hardback. Gregory Hanlon, Death and Control in the West, 1500–1800: Sex Ratios at Baptism in Italy, France and England (New York: Routledge, 2023). Pages XIX + 307 + 18 Figures + 65 Graphs + 2 Maps. $39.16 paperback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1