我只是在做我的工作!政府举报人访谈中的进化、腐败和公共关系

IF 0.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Partecipazione e Conflitto Pub Date : 2020-07-17 DOI:10.1285/I20356609V13I2P1042
Cary A. Greenwood
{"title":"我只是在做我的工作!政府举报人访谈中的进化、腐败和公共关系","authors":"Cary A. Greenwood","doi":"10.1285/I20356609V13I2P1042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses public sector communication by exploring the role of government whistleblowers. It argues for the need to reconnect voices by creating platforms from which whistleblowers can speak without fear of retribution for the betterment of society. The paper presents 13 in-depth interviews with whistleblowers who worked for governmental entities in the United States or who worked as contractors to U.S. government entities. The goal was to understand their stories, including why they blew the whistle, how they blew the whistle, how whistleblowing affected their relationships with their employers, what role public relations executives and practitioners played in their whistleblowing experience, and how public relations executives and practitioners could interact more productively with whistleblowers. Four of the five theories explained some of the dynamics of whistleblowing: Resource dependence perspective explained the role of upper management in relying on wrongdoing; normalization of corruption theory explained attempts to conscript new employees into corrupt practices; justice theory explained the sense of betrayal felt by employees who tried to correct wrongdoing; and relationship management further explained the negative impact of retaliation on the relationships between whistleblowers and their employers. However, evolutionary theory explained all aspects of whistleblowing in terms of Darwinian natural selection.","PeriodicalId":45168,"journal":{"name":"Partecipazione e Conflitto","volume":"13 1","pages":"1042-1061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I Was Just Doing My Job! Evolution, Corruption, and Public Relations in Interviews with Government Whistleblowers\",\"authors\":\"Cary A. Greenwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1285/I20356609V13I2P1042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses public sector communication by exploring the role of government whistleblowers. It argues for the need to reconnect voices by creating platforms from which whistleblowers can speak without fear of retribution for the betterment of society. The paper presents 13 in-depth interviews with whistleblowers who worked for governmental entities in the United States or who worked as contractors to U.S. government entities. The goal was to understand their stories, including why they blew the whistle, how they blew the whistle, how whistleblowing affected their relationships with their employers, what role public relations executives and practitioners played in their whistleblowing experience, and how public relations executives and practitioners could interact more productively with whistleblowers. Four of the five theories explained some of the dynamics of whistleblowing: Resource dependence perspective explained the role of upper management in relying on wrongdoing; normalization of corruption theory explained attempts to conscript new employees into corrupt practices; justice theory explained the sense of betrayal felt by employees who tried to correct wrongdoing; and relationship management further explained the negative impact of retaliation on the relationships between whistleblowers and their employers. However, evolutionary theory explained all aspects of whistleblowing in terms of Darwinian natural selection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Partecipazione e Conflitto\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1042-1061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Partecipazione e Conflitto\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20356609V13I2P1042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partecipazione e Conflitto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20356609V13I2P1042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过探讨政府举报人的角色来解决公共部门的沟通问题。它认为,为了改善社会,有必要通过创建平台来重新连接声音,让告密者可以在不担心报复的情况下发声。本文对13名在美国政府机构工作或担任美国政府机构承包商的举报人进行了深入访谈。目的是了解他们的故事,包括他们为什么举报,他们是如何举报的,举报如何影响他们与雇主的关系,公共关系主管和从业人员在他们的举报经历中扮演了什么角色,以及公共关系主管和从业人员如何与举报人进行更有效的互动。五种理论中有四种解释了一些告密的动态:资源依赖视角解释了高层管理人员依赖不法行为的作用;腐败正常化理论解释了试图将新员工纳入腐败行为;正义理论解释了试图纠正错误的员工所感受到的背叛感;关系管理进一步解释了报复对举报人与雇主关系的负面影响。然而,进化论用达尔文的自然选择理论解释了举报行为的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
I Was Just Doing My Job! Evolution, Corruption, and Public Relations in Interviews with Government Whistleblowers
This paper addresses public sector communication by exploring the role of government whistleblowers. It argues for the need to reconnect voices by creating platforms from which whistleblowers can speak without fear of retribution for the betterment of society. The paper presents 13 in-depth interviews with whistleblowers who worked for governmental entities in the United States or who worked as contractors to U.S. government entities. The goal was to understand their stories, including why they blew the whistle, how they blew the whistle, how whistleblowing affected their relationships with their employers, what role public relations executives and practitioners played in their whistleblowing experience, and how public relations executives and practitioners could interact more productively with whistleblowers. Four of the five theories explained some of the dynamics of whistleblowing: Resource dependence perspective explained the role of upper management in relying on wrongdoing; normalization of corruption theory explained attempts to conscript new employees into corrupt practices; justice theory explained the sense of betrayal felt by employees who tried to correct wrongdoing; and relationship management further explained the negative impact of retaliation on the relationships between whistleblowers and their employers. However, evolutionary theory explained all aspects of whistleblowing in terms of Darwinian natural selection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Partecipazione e Conflitto
Partecipazione e Conflitto POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: PArtecipazione e COnflitto [PArticipation and COnflict] is an International Journal based in Italy specialized in social and political studies. PACO houses research and studies on the transformations of politics and its key players (political parties, interest groups, social movements, associations, unions, etc.), focusing in particular on the dynamics of participation both by individuals acting in conventional ways, and by those who prefer protest-oriented repertoires of action. Special attention is also paid to the dynamics of transformation of contemporary political systems, with an eye fixed on the processes of democratization besides on the spaces opening to the new forms of governance both at local and sub-national, and supra-national level. All are inscribed in that complex phenomenon represented by the trans-nationalization of social, political and economic processes, without neglecting the nation-state dimension. The journal emphasizes innovative studies and research of high methodological rigor, treasuring of the most recent theoretical and empirical contributions in social and political sciences.
期刊最新文献
Community-Led Housing in Yangon: The Struggles of Non-Confrontational Resistance and Feminist Crisis Management The Xi'an Schizophrenia Imaging Lab (SIL) data and ten years of MRI study on schizophrenia. Overcoming the limits of EMU through Covid? Next Generation EU against the unaddressed needs for ambitious structural reform The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome (Re)Creating "Society in Silico": Surveillance Capitalism, Simulations and Subjectivity in the Cambridge Analytica Data Scandal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1