提议者和回应者在有罪不罚的讨价还价中让步

IF 1 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Metroeconomica Pub Date : 2023-07-22 DOI:10.1111/meca.12437
Daniela Di Cagno, Werner Güth, Luca Panaccione, Maria Cristina Scarafile
{"title":"提议者和回应者在有罪不罚的讨价还价中让步","authors":"Daniela Di Cagno,&nbsp;Werner Güth,&nbsp;Luca Panaccione,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Scarafile","doi":"10.1111/meca.12437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In impunity bargaining with concession, opportunistic proposers would not offer anything nor concede. Opportunistic responders should not accept first offers since second offers could be more generous, for example, due to random trembles. On the contrary, our experimental data, elicited via the strategy vector method, show that participants moderate initial claims and concede, albeit by small amounts. The considerable heterogeneity in behavior suggests that disagreement is unpleasant: participants avoid it by yielding (demanding firstly less than what can be shared) and conceding (lowering first demand). Overall agreement dominates interpersonally (one plays against another) and intrapersonally (as if one plays against oneself).</p>","PeriodicalId":46885,"journal":{"name":"Metroeconomica","volume":"74 4","pages":"722-747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposer and responder conceding in impunity bargaining\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Di Cagno,&nbsp;Werner Güth,&nbsp;Luca Panaccione,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Scarafile\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/meca.12437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In impunity bargaining with concession, opportunistic proposers would not offer anything nor concede. Opportunistic responders should not accept first offers since second offers could be more generous, for example, due to random trembles. On the contrary, our experimental data, elicited via the strategy vector method, show that participants moderate initial claims and concede, albeit by small amounts. The considerable heterogeneity in behavior suggests that disagreement is unpleasant: participants avoid it by yielding (demanding firstly less than what can be shared) and conceding (lowering first demand). Overall agreement dominates interpersonally (one plays against another) and intrapersonally (as if one plays against oneself).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metroeconomica\",\"volume\":\"74 4\",\"pages\":\"722-747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metroeconomica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meca.12437\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metroeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meca.12437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在不受惩罚与让步的讨价还价中,机会主义的提议者不会提供任何东西,也不会让步。机会主义反应者不应该接受第一次出价,因为第二次出价可能更慷慨,例如,由于随机颤抖。相反,我们通过策略向量法得出的实验数据表明,参与者缓和了最初的主张,并做出了让步,尽管幅度很小。行为上的巨大异质性表明,分歧是令人不快的:参与者通过让步(首先要求的比可以分享的少)和让步(降低第一个要求)来避免分歧。总体共识在人际关系(一个人与另一个人对抗)和个人关系(好像一个人与自己对抗)中占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proposer and responder conceding in impunity bargaining

In impunity bargaining with concession, opportunistic proposers would not offer anything nor concede. Opportunistic responders should not accept first offers since second offers could be more generous, for example, due to random trembles. On the contrary, our experimental data, elicited via the strategy vector method, show that participants moderate initial claims and concede, albeit by small amounts. The considerable heterogeneity in behavior suggests that disagreement is unpleasant: participants avoid it by yielding (demanding firstly less than what can be shared) and conceding (lowering first demand). Overall agreement dominates interpersonally (one plays against another) and intrapersonally (as if one plays against oneself).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metroeconomica
Metroeconomica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Partially funded social security and growth Testing the theory of the firm under price and background risk Monetary policy, income distribution and semi‐autonomous demand in the US Using input‐output data to model the structure of export linkages in global value chains: A Brazil case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1