美国金融分析师的起源

IF 1.7 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting History Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1177/10323732231163610
Jesus R. Jimenez-Andrade
{"title":"美国金融分析师的起源","authors":"Jesus R. Jimenez-Andrade","doi":"10.1177/10323732231163610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the United States securities market's creation and promulgation of the Investment Advisers Act in 1940, financial analysts transitioned from a highly unregulated practice to one of the most heavily regulated professions. Relying on multiple formal archival sources, this article explores the antecedents behind this bolstering event. Applying a chronological historical analysis, findings suggest that three factors forced regulators to intervene: the unethical abuses uncovered by a committee with highly specialised skills, the inability of financial analysts to adhere to ethical practices and professional segregation combined with absent collective institutional values. These findings illustrate the regulatory consequences in collective sanctioning cases (rather than criminal or economic penalties imposed on specific individuals). A socio-economic historical triangulation enriches the quality of these findings.","PeriodicalId":45774,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History","volume":"28 1","pages":"338 - 353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Origins of financial analysts in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Jesus R. Jimenez-Andrade\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10323732231163610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the United States securities market's creation and promulgation of the Investment Advisers Act in 1940, financial analysts transitioned from a highly unregulated practice to one of the most heavily regulated professions. Relying on multiple formal archival sources, this article explores the antecedents behind this bolstering event. Applying a chronological historical analysis, findings suggest that three factors forced regulators to intervene: the unethical abuses uncovered by a committee with highly specialised skills, the inability of financial analysts to adhere to ethical practices and professional segregation combined with absent collective institutional values. These findings illustrate the regulatory consequences in collective sanctioning cases (rather than criminal or economic penalties imposed on specific individuals). A socio-economic historical triangulation enriches the quality of these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting History\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"338 - 353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732231163610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10323732231163610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1940年美国证券市场创立并颁布《投资顾问法》以来,金融分析师从一个高度不受监管的行业转变为监管最严格的行业之一。依靠多种正式的档案来源,本文探讨了这一支持事件背后的前因后果。通过按时间顺序进行历史分析,研究结果表明,有三个因素迫使监管机构进行干预:一个拥有高度专业技能的委员会发现的不道德的滥用行为、金融分析师无法遵守道德惯例、职业隔离以及集体制度价值观的缺失。这些发现说明了集体制裁案件(而不是对特定个人施加刑事或经济处罚)的监管后果。社会经济历史三角测量丰富了这些发现的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Origins of financial analysts in the United States
Since the United States securities market's creation and promulgation of the Investment Advisers Act in 1940, financial analysts transitioned from a highly unregulated practice to one of the most heavily regulated professions. Relying on multiple formal archival sources, this article explores the antecedents behind this bolstering event. Applying a chronological historical analysis, findings suggest that three factors forced regulators to intervene: the unethical abuses uncovered by a committee with highly specialised skills, the inability of financial analysts to adhere to ethical practices and professional segregation combined with absent collective institutional values. These findings illustrate the regulatory consequences in collective sanctioning cases (rather than criminal or economic penalties imposed on specific individuals). A socio-economic historical triangulation enriches the quality of these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounting History
Accounting History BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Accounting History is an international peer reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality historical papers. These could be concerned with exploring the advent and development of accounting bodies, conventions, ideas, practices and rules. They should attempt to identify the individuals and also the local, time-specific environmental factors which affected accounting, and should endeavour to assess accounting"s impact on organisational and social functioning.
期刊最新文献
ACCOUNTING HISTORY SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP Diverse counter accounts for biodiversity conservation: The case of the High Ross Dam controversy World War 2 governmental cost-plus procurement: An Australian case study The multiple logics of Buddhist monastery accounting The qualitative leaps of the accounting discipline in Italy between the nineteenth and twentieth century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1