国际法中的武力使用

G. Melling
{"title":"国际法中的武力使用","authors":"G. Melling","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2019.1691365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Book Review: It is uncontroversial that the international law governing the use of force (jus ad bellum), forms a cornerstone of the international system, and its legal order. The question of the right to resort to war, and the use of force, have been a constant feature of the condition of people, states, and international society. It is certainly a depressing reality that despite efforts to outlaw, abolish, and regulate the use of force in the relations of states, we are apparently little closer to achieving that goal.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"6 1","pages":"329 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20531702.2019.1691365","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of force in international law\",\"authors\":\"G. Melling\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20531702.2019.1691365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Book Review: It is uncontroversial that the international law governing the use of force (jus ad bellum), forms a cornerstone of the international system, and its legal order. The question of the right to resort to war, and the use of force, have been a constant feature of the condition of people, states, and international society. It is certainly a depressing reality that despite efforts to outlaw, abolish, and regulate the use of force in the relations of states, we are apparently little closer to achieving that goal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"329 - 337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20531702.2019.1691365\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2019.1691365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2019.1691365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

书评:无可争议的是,规范武力使用的国际法(jusus ad bellum)构成了国际体系及其法律秩序的基石。诉诸战争和使用武力的权利问题一直是人民、国家和国际社会状况的一个不变特征。这当然是一个令人沮丧的现实,尽管我们努力取缔、废除和规范在国家关系中使用武力,但我们显然离实现这一目标还差得远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The use of force in international law
Book Review: It is uncontroversial that the international law governing the use of force (jus ad bellum), forms a cornerstone of the international system, and its legal order. The question of the right to resort to war, and the use of force, have been a constant feature of the condition of people, states, and international society. It is certainly a depressing reality that despite efforts to outlaw, abolish, and regulate the use of force in the relations of states, we are apparently little closer to achieving that goal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Quashing protests abroad: The CSTO’s intervention in Kazakhstan Intervention by invitation and the scope of state consent Anticipatory consent to military intervention: analysis in the wake of the coup d’état in Niger in 2023 The war in Ukraine and legal limitations on Russian vetoes Digest of state practice: 1 January – 30 June 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1