威廉与乔治的传统

IF 0.1 N/A POETRY WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0187

Sam Hushagen

{"title":"威廉与乔治的传统","authors":"Sam Hushagen","doi":"10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Long linked to pastoral, Williams’s engagement with the literary past is more complex than critics recognize. His emphasis on formal mediation and compositional method rather than rigid convention connect him to traditions of georgic that emphasize the craftwork of writing poems. Particularly in Spring and All, Williams engages georgic to critically examine the classical “praise of spring” motif and rethink dominant accounts of perceptual experience.","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"William Carlos Williams and the Traditions of Georgic\",\"authors\":\"Sam Hushagen\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Long linked to pastoral, Williams’s engagement with the literary past is more complex than critics recognize. His emphasis on formal mediation and compositional method rather than rigid convention connect him to traditions of georgic that emphasize the craftwork of writing poems. Particularly in Spring and All, Williams engages georgic to critically examine the classical “praise of spring” motif and rethink dominant accounts of perceptual experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:长期以来，威廉斯与田园诗联系在一起，他与文学历史的关系比评论家们所认识到的要复杂得多。他强调正式的调解和写作方法，而不是严格的惯例，将他与强调写诗工艺的传统联系在一起。特别是在《春与万物》中，威廉姆斯让乔治批判性地审视了经典的“赞美春天”主题，并重新思考了感性经验的主流说法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

William Carlos Williams and the Traditions of Georgic

ABSTRACT:Long linked to pastoral, Williams’s engagement with the literary past is more complex than critics recognize. His emphasis on formal mediation and compositional method rather than rigid convention connect him to traditions of georgic that emphasize the craftwork of writing poems. Particularly in Spring and All, Williams engages georgic to critically examine the classical “praise of spring” motif and rethink dominant accounts of perceptual experience.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW POETRY-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

“No One to Witness and Adjust”: The Academy Still in Peril Spring and All No Longer in Peril Spring and All: The Present 100 Years Later Modernist Hangover? William Carlos Williams as Bob Perelman’s Poetic Cure Which Side Are You On?