中国区域二氧化碳分配的再思考:基于碳汇的思考

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106822
Mian Yang , Yaru Hou , Qiaojiayu Wang
{"title":"中国区域二氧化碳分配的再思考:基于碳汇的思考","authors":"Mian Yang ,&nbsp;Yaru Hou ,&nbsp;Qiaojiayu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A fair regional CO<sub>2</sub><span> allocation scheme is an important guarantee to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality. Most existing studies on CO</span><sub>2</sub><span><span> allocation focus on carbon sources while ignore the role of carbon sinks. By combining the carbon sinks estimated by </span>remote sensing technology with the carbon sources identified from multiple dimensions, this paper first analyzes the characteristics of China's net CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions in 2015. Then a centralized DEA model is developed to construct a net CO<sub>2</sub> allocation scheme in 2020 and 2030 using historical data in 2015 with the help of the Python programming. On this basis, the allocation schemes considering carbon sinks or not are further compared to verify the rationality of the proposed allocation results. It concludes that a net CO<sub>2</sub> allocation scheme considering carbon sinks delivers significantly better results as it eases the dispersion of inter-provincial carbon quota and balances the development among regions. Geographically, Southwest China, rich in carbon sinks but less developed, will be given more quotas if carbon sinks are included than if they are not, while North China, poor in carbon sinks but more developed, will assume more responsibility for reducing emissions. Our paper sheds light on the importance of incorporating carbon sinks into the CO<sub>2</sub> allocation issue.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 106822"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking on regional CO2 allocation in China: A consideration of the carbon sink\",\"authors\":\"Mian Yang ,&nbsp;Yaru Hou ,&nbsp;Qiaojiayu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A fair regional CO<sub>2</sub><span> allocation scheme is an important guarantee to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality. Most existing studies on CO</span><sub>2</sub><span><span> allocation focus on carbon sources while ignore the role of carbon sinks. By combining the carbon sinks estimated by </span>remote sensing technology with the carbon sources identified from multiple dimensions, this paper first analyzes the characteristics of China's net CO</span><sub>2</sub> emissions in 2015. Then a centralized DEA model is developed to construct a net CO<sub>2</sub> allocation scheme in 2020 and 2030 using historical data in 2015 with the help of the Python programming. On this basis, the allocation schemes considering carbon sinks or not are further compared to verify the rationality of the proposed allocation results. It concludes that a net CO<sub>2</sub> allocation scheme considering carbon sinks delivers significantly better results as it eases the dispersion of inter-provincial carbon quota and balances the development among regions. Geographically, Southwest China, rich in carbon sinks but less developed, will be given more quotas if carbon sinks are included than if they are not, while North China, poor in carbon sinks but more developed, will assume more responsibility for reducing emissions. Our paper sheds light on the importance of incorporating carbon sinks into the CO<sub>2</sub> allocation issue.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925522000889\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925522000889","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

公平的区域二氧化碳分配方案是实现碳峰值和碳中和的重要保证。现有的二氧化碳分配研究大多侧重于碳源,而忽视了碳汇的作用。本文首先将遥感技术估算的碳汇与多维度识别的碳源相结合,分析了2015年中国二氧化碳净排放特征。然后利用2015年的历史数据,借助Python编程,建立集中式DEA模型,构建2020年和2030年的二氧化碳净分配方案。在此基础上,进一步对比考虑碳汇和不考虑碳汇的分配方案,验证所提分配结果的合理性。结果表明,考虑碳汇的二氧化碳净分配方案能够缓解省际碳配额的分散,平衡区域间的发展。从地域上看,碳汇丰富但欠发达的西南地区,如果纳入碳汇,将获得比不纳入碳汇更多的配额;而碳汇较差但较发达的华北地区,将承担更多的减排责任。我们的论文阐明了将碳汇纳入二氧化碳分配问题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking on regional CO2 allocation in China: A consideration of the carbon sink

A fair regional CO2 allocation scheme is an important guarantee to achieve carbon peak and carbon neutrality. Most existing studies on CO2 allocation focus on carbon sources while ignore the role of carbon sinks. By combining the carbon sinks estimated by remote sensing technology with the carbon sources identified from multiple dimensions, this paper first analyzes the characteristics of China's net CO2 emissions in 2015. Then a centralized DEA model is developed to construct a net CO2 allocation scheme in 2020 and 2030 using historical data in 2015 with the help of the Python programming. On this basis, the allocation schemes considering carbon sinks or not are further compared to verify the rationality of the proposed allocation results. It concludes that a net CO2 allocation scheme considering carbon sinks delivers significantly better results as it eases the dispersion of inter-provincial carbon quota and balances the development among regions. Geographically, Southwest China, rich in carbon sinks but less developed, will be given more quotas if carbon sinks are included than if they are not, while North China, poor in carbon sinks but more developed, will assume more responsibility for reducing emissions. Our paper sheds light on the importance of incorporating carbon sinks into the CO2 allocation issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1