美国最高法院为学生进入公立宗教学校铺平道路:潜在的歧视性做法

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/15507394.2022.2127629
S. Eckes, Preston C. Green
{"title":"美国最高法院为学生进入公立宗教学校铺平道路:潜在的歧视性做法","authors":"S. Eckes, Preston C. Green","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2022.2127629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The U.S. Supreme Court examined whether Maine needed to include sectarian schools in a program designed to provide a free public education to students who live in areas that do not operate public schools. In Carson v. Makin the Court ruled that states are now required to fund religious education if they also fund private education. Although not the focus of the decision, this case raises related concerns about states being required to use public funds to support private religious schools that engage in discriminatory practices. This study seeks to examine whether the Court considered the potential for discriminatory practices.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"374 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The U.S. Supreme Court Paves Pathway for Students to Attend Publicly Funded Religious Schools: The Potential for Discriminatory Practices\",\"authors\":\"S. Eckes, Preston C. Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15507394.2022.2127629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The U.S. Supreme Court examined whether Maine needed to include sectarian schools in a program designed to provide a free public education to students who live in areas that do not operate public schools. In Carson v. Makin the Court ruled that states are now required to fund religious education if they also fund private education. Although not the focus of the decision, this case raises related concerns about states being required to use public funds to support private religious schools that engage in discriminatory practices. This study seeks to examine whether the Court considered the potential for discriminatory practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion & Education\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"374 - 390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2127629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2127629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要美国最高法院审查了缅因州是否需要将宗派学校纳入一项计划,该计划旨在为居住在没有公立学校的地区的学生提供免费的公共教育。在Carson诉Makin案中,法院裁定,如果各州也资助私立教育,那么现在就必须资助宗教教育。尽管这起案件不是裁决的重点,但它引发了人们对各州被要求使用公共资金支持从事歧视性做法的私立宗教学校的相关担忧。本研究旨在审查法院是否考虑到歧视性做法的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The U.S. Supreme Court Paves Pathway for Students to Attend Publicly Funded Religious Schools: The Potential for Discriminatory Practices
Abstract The U.S. Supreme Court examined whether Maine needed to include sectarian schools in a program designed to provide a free public education to students who live in areas that do not operate public schools. In Carson v. Makin the Court ruled that states are now required to fund religious education if they also fund private education. Although not the focus of the decision, this case raises related concerns about states being required to use public funds to support private religious schools that engage in discriminatory practices. This study seeks to examine whether the Court considered the potential for discriminatory practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1