A. S., Baig Ja, Afrid Hi, Waris M, A. W, Naeem A, Sidhu Ar
{"title":"方波吸附溶出伏安法与分光光度法测定头孢地洛辛的分析比较","authors":"A. S., Baig Ja, Afrid Hi, Waris M, A. W, Naeem A, Sidhu Ar","doi":"10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this research is to verify the proposed nano-silver amalgam paste electrode (Ag-nano-SPE) method to compare with a spectrophotometric technique based on derivatization with potassium periodate (KIO4 ), 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine (DNP) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for the estimation of cefadroxil (CFDL) by square wave adsorptive stripping voltammetry (SWAV). The different parameters of both methods were optimized in detail separately and then compared their efficiency, selectivity, sensitivity and applications. The SWAV produced a reduction peak with a precise definition at -0.160 V while measuring CFDL in 0.04 molL-1 Britton–Robinson buffer at pH 4, accumulation potential (0.5 V), accumulation time (10 sec), and with stirring rate of 200 rpm. Whereas, the CFDL was measured at 515 nm (λmax) by UVVisible spectrophotometer after the derivatization by using 1.5 mL of 0.5 mM DNP, 1.5 mL of 6.52 mM KIO4 and 0.5 mL of 10 M NaOH solution at room temperature. The linear response for CFDL was found using the SWAV and spectrophotometric techniques along a linear dynamic range from 0.033 - 0.304 and 0.051 - 1.376 µM, respectively. However, the precision, detection limit and quantification limit of SWAV for CFDL in the samples and standards significantly lower (p <0.01) as compared to spectrophotometric method. This indicates that the SWAV is more sensitive and selective than the spectrophotometric technique for regular CFDL analysis.","PeriodicalId":91055,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical Comparison of Cefadroxil Determination by Square Wave Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetric and Spectrophotometric Methods\",\"authors\":\"A. S., Baig Ja, Afrid Hi, Waris M, A. W, Naeem A, Sidhu Ar\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this research is to verify the proposed nano-silver amalgam paste electrode (Ag-nano-SPE) method to compare with a spectrophotometric technique based on derivatization with potassium periodate (KIO4 ), 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine (DNP) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for the estimation of cefadroxil (CFDL) by square wave adsorptive stripping voltammetry (SWAV). The different parameters of both methods were optimized in detail separately and then compared their efficiency, selectivity, sensitivity and applications. The SWAV produced a reduction peak with a precise definition at -0.160 V while measuring CFDL in 0.04 molL-1 Britton–Robinson buffer at pH 4, accumulation potential (0.5 V), accumulation time (10 sec), and with stirring rate of 200 rpm. Whereas, the CFDL was measured at 515 nm (λmax) by UVVisible spectrophotometer after the derivatization by using 1.5 mL of 0.5 mM DNP, 1.5 mL of 6.52 mM KIO4 and 0.5 mL of 10 M NaOH solution at room temperature. The linear response for CFDL was found using the SWAV and spectrophotometric techniques along a linear dynamic range from 0.033 - 0.304 and 0.051 - 1.376 µM, respectively. However, the precision, detection limit and quantification limit of SWAV for CFDL in the samples and standards significantly lower (p <0.01) as compared to spectrophotometric method. This indicates that the SWAV is more sensitive and selective than the spectrophotometric technique for regular CFDL analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjanalpharmchem.2022.1138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是验证所提出的纳米银汞齐膏电极(Ag-nano-SPE)方法,并与基于高碘酸钾(KIO4)、2,4-二硝基苯肼(DNP)和氢氧化钠(NaOH)衍生化的分光光度法(方波吸附溶出伏安法(SWAV)测定头孢地螺醇(CFDL)的方法进行比较。分别对两种方法的不同参数进行了详细的优化,并对其效率、选择性、灵敏度和应用进行了比较。在pH为4、积累电位(0.5 V)、积累时间(10秒)、搅拌速度为200 rpm的0.04 mol -1 briton - robinson缓冲液中测量CFDL时,SWAV在-0.160 V下产生了一个精确定义的还原峰。在室温下,用1.5 mL 0.5 mM DNP、1.5 mL 6.52 mM KIO4和0.5 mL 10 M NaOH溶液衍生化后,用紫外可见分光光度计在515 nm (λmax)处测量CFDL。在0.033 ~ 0.304µM和0.051 ~ 1.376µM的线性动态范围内,采用SWAV和分光光度法测定CFDL的线性响应。然而,与分光光度法相比,swv法在样品和标准品中检测CFDL的精密度、检出限和定量限均显著降低(p <0.01)。这表明SWAV比分光光度法在常规CFDL分析中具有更高的灵敏度和选择性。
Analytical Comparison of Cefadroxil Determination by Square Wave Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetric and Spectrophotometric Methods
The goal of this research is to verify the proposed nano-silver amalgam paste electrode (Ag-nano-SPE) method to compare with a spectrophotometric technique based on derivatization with potassium periodate (KIO4 ), 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine (DNP) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for the estimation of cefadroxil (CFDL) by square wave adsorptive stripping voltammetry (SWAV). The different parameters of both methods were optimized in detail separately and then compared their efficiency, selectivity, sensitivity and applications. The SWAV produced a reduction peak with a precise definition at -0.160 V while measuring CFDL in 0.04 molL-1 Britton–Robinson buffer at pH 4, accumulation potential (0.5 V), accumulation time (10 sec), and with stirring rate of 200 rpm. Whereas, the CFDL was measured at 515 nm (λmax) by UVVisible spectrophotometer after the derivatization by using 1.5 mL of 0.5 mM DNP, 1.5 mL of 6.52 mM KIO4 and 0.5 mL of 10 M NaOH solution at room temperature. The linear response for CFDL was found using the SWAV and spectrophotometric techniques along a linear dynamic range from 0.033 - 0.304 and 0.051 - 1.376 µM, respectively. However, the precision, detection limit and quantification limit of SWAV for CFDL in the samples and standards significantly lower (p <0.01) as compared to spectrophotometric method. This indicates that the SWAV is more sensitive and selective than the spectrophotometric technique for regular CFDL analysis.