卡车司机上岗前头发和尿液药物测试效果的比较

IF 3.6 Q2 MANAGEMENT Logistics-Basel Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.3390/logistics7030044
Ming Li, M. D. Voss, J. Cangelosi
{"title":"卡车司机上岗前头发和尿液药物测试效果的比较","authors":"Ming Li, M. D. Voss, J. Cangelosi","doi":"10.3390/logistics7030044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To help ensure roadway safety, the federal government mandates trucking companies to conduct pre-employment urine drug tests before allowing drivers to operate a commercial motor vehicle. Unfortunately, urine testing has a short detection window and is easily thwarted, leading some carriers to employ hair testing. Methods: t-tests were utilized to compare hair and urine pre-employment drug test results provided by seven large U.S. trucking companies. Results: results indicate that hair’s positivity rate is statistically greater than urine for each examined drug and across all drugs combined. Conclusions: This paper is the only supply chain work of which we are aware that assesses the statistical differences between hair and urine testing positivity rates. Results support hair testing’s increased ability to prevent lifestyle drug users from operating commercial motor vehicles and should be considered by public policy makers considering whether hair testing results should be allowed into the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.","PeriodicalId":56264,"journal":{"name":"Logistics-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Truck Driver Pre-Employment Hair and Urine Drug Test Efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Ming Li, M. D. Voss, J. Cangelosi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/logistics7030044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To help ensure roadway safety, the federal government mandates trucking companies to conduct pre-employment urine drug tests before allowing drivers to operate a commercial motor vehicle. Unfortunately, urine testing has a short detection window and is easily thwarted, leading some carriers to employ hair testing. Methods: t-tests were utilized to compare hair and urine pre-employment drug test results provided by seven large U.S. trucking companies. Results: results indicate that hair’s positivity rate is statistically greater than urine for each examined drug and across all drugs combined. Conclusions: This paper is the only supply chain work of which we are aware that assesses the statistical differences between hair and urine testing positivity rates. Results support hair testing’s increased ability to prevent lifestyle drug users from operating commercial motor vehicles and should be considered by public policy makers considering whether hair testing results should be allowed into the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logistics-Basel\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logistics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7030044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logistics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7030044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了确保道路安全,联邦政府要求卡车运输公司在允许司机驾驶商用机动车之前进行岗前尿液药物测试。不幸的是,尿液检测的检测窗口很短,很容易受阻,导致一些携带者采用毛发检测。方法:采用t检验比较美国七家大型卡车运输公司提供的头发和尿液的就业前药物测试结果。结果:结果表明,在统计上,每种检查药物和所有药物的组合中,头发的阳性率都高于尿液。结论:这篇论文是我们所知的唯一一篇评估头发和尿液检测阳性率之间统计差异的供应链工作。这些结果支持头发检测提高了防止生活方式吸毒者驾驶商用机动车的能力,公共政策制定者应考虑是否应允许头发检测结果进入毒品和酒精信息交换所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Truck Driver Pre-Employment Hair and Urine Drug Test Efficacy
Background: To help ensure roadway safety, the federal government mandates trucking companies to conduct pre-employment urine drug tests before allowing drivers to operate a commercial motor vehicle. Unfortunately, urine testing has a short detection window and is easily thwarted, leading some carriers to employ hair testing. Methods: t-tests were utilized to compare hair and urine pre-employment drug test results provided by seven large U.S. trucking companies. Results: results indicate that hair’s positivity rate is statistically greater than urine for each examined drug and across all drugs combined. Conclusions: This paper is the only supply chain work of which we are aware that assesses the statistical differences between hair and urine testing positivity rates. Results support hair testing’s increased ability to prevent lifestyle drug users from operating commercial motor vehicles and should be considered by public policy makers considering whether hair testing results should be allowed into the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Logistics-Basel
Logistics-Basel Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Current State and Future of International Logistics Networks—The Role of Digitalization and Sustainability in a Globalized World An Innovative Framework for Quality Assurance in Logistics Packaging Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation in the COVID-19 Era: Implications from Driving Schools A Systematic Literature Review on the Application of Automation in Logistics Climate Justice Implications of Banning Air-Freighted Fresh Produce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1