康涅狄格州西南部湿地植物群落对澳大利亚芦苇(Poacee)管理的反应

IF 0.2 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Rhodora Pub Date : 2020-05-21 DOI:10.3119/19-05
E. Faison, G. Elkins, Kathleen Kitka, D. Foster
{"title":"康涅狄格州西南部湿地植物群落对澳大利亚芦苇(Poacee)管理的反应","authors":"E. Faison, G. Elkins, Kathleen Kitka, D. Foster","doi":"10.3119/19-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many conservation organizations remove invasive plants with herbicides; however, few quantify the outcomes of management on the invaded plant community (Martin and Blossey 2013). Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. is a perennial grass, native to Eurasia, that is now found throughout temperate regions of North America in fresh water, brackish, and salt marsh environments (Meyerson et al. 2009). Despite considerable interest in the effects of P. australis on native wetland ecosystems, relatively little information exists on the efficacy of different management strategies and the response of plant communities to the removal of P. australis, especially over multiple years (Hazelton et al. 2014; Martin and Blossey 2013). We examined the efficacy and effects of removing Phragmites australis from the perimeter of a 1-hectare pond at Highstead Preserve in southwestern Connecticut (41.327, –73.394) over a six-year period (2012–2017). Prior to the study, P. australis covered 30% of the shoreline around the pond and formed several small (, 100 m), dense patches and one relatively large patch (~1300 m). We used vegetation monitoring and three different herbicide (Rodeot [53.8% glyphosate]) application techniques to treat P. australis: (1) handwipe 25% solution (leaves and upper half of stem wiped via cotton work glove worn over 15 mil nitrile glove); (2) wand 25% solution (leaves and upper half of stem wiped with long-handled brush applicator); and (3) spray 2.3% solution (whole plant with backpack sprayer). Prior to herbicide treatment in 2012, we sampled the pondside vegetation by randomly placing 28 quadrats 1 m in patches invaded by P. australis. In each quadrat, we counted live stems of all vascular plant species with the exception of graminoids that grew in overlapping clumps (Farnsworth","PeriodicalId":54454,"journal":{"name":"Rhodora","volume":"122 1","pages":"48 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of a Wetland Plant Community to Management of Phragmites Australis (Poaceae) in Southwestern Connecticut\",\"authors\":\"E. Faison, G. Elkins, Kathleen Kitka, D. Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.3119/19-05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many conservation organizations remove invasive plants with herbicides; however, few quantify the outcomes of management on the invaded plant community (Martin and Blossey 2013). Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. is a perennial grass, native to Eurasia, that is now found throughout temperate regions of North America in fresh water, brackish, and salt marsh environments (Meyerson et al. 2009). Despite considerable interest in the effects of P. australis on native wetland ecosystems, relatively little information exists on the efficacy of different management strategies and the response of plant communities to the removal of P. australis, especially over multiple years (Hazelton et al. 2014; Martin and Blossey 2013). We examined the efficacy and effects of removing Phragmites australis from the perimeter of a 1-hectare pond at Highstead Preserve in southwestern Connecticut (41.327, –73.394) over a six-year period (2012–2017). Prior to the study, P. australis covered 30% of the shoreline around the pond and formed several small (, 100 m), dense patches and one relatively large patch (~1300 m). We used vegetation monitoring and three different herbicide (Rodeot [53.8% glyphosate]) application techniques to treat P. australis: (1) handwipe 25% solution (leaves and upper half of stem wiped via cotton work glove worn over 15 mil nitrile glove); (2) wand 25% solution (leaves and upper half of stem wiped with long-handled brush applicator); and (3) spray 2.3% solution (whole plant with backpack sprayer). Prior to herbicide treatment in 2012, we sampled the pondside vegetation by randomly placing 28 quadrats 1 m in patches invaded by P. australis. In each quadrat, we counted live stems of all vascular plant species with the exception of graminoids that grew in overlapping clumps (Farnsworth\",\"PeriodicalId\":54454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhodora\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"48 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhodora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3119/19-05\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhodora","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3119/19-05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多保护组织用除草剂清除入侵植物;然而,很少有人量化对入侵植物群落的管理结果(Martin和Blossey,2013)。芦苇。前Steud。是一种多年生草本植物,原产于欧亚大陆,现在分布在北美洲的温带淡水、半咸水和盐沼环境中(Meyerson等人,2009)。尽管人们对澳大利亚对虾对原生湿地生态系统的影响非常感兴趣,但关于不同管理策略的有效性和植物群落对澳大利亚对虾的清除反应的信息相对较少,尤其是在多年内(Hazelton等人,2014;Martin和Blossey,2013年)。我们研究了在六年时间(2012-2017年)内,从康涅狄格州西南部Highstead保护区的一个1公顷池塘(41.327,–73.394)周围清除芦苇的功效和效果。在研究之前,P.australis覆盖了池塘周围30%的海岸线,并形成了几个小的(100米)密集斑块和一个相对较大的斑块(~1300米)。我们使用植被监测和三种不同的除草剂(Rodeot[53.8%草甘膦])施用技术来处理澳大利亚P.australis:(1)手工清洗25%的溶液(用棉手套擦拭树叶和茎的上半部分,手套上戴着15密耳的丁腈手套);(2) 25%的棒状溶液(用长柄刷涂器擦拭叶片和茎的上半部分);(3)喷洒2.3%溶液(全株背负式喷雾器)。在2012年进行除草剂处理之前,我们通过在被P.australis入侵的斑块中随机放置28个1米的象限,对池塘边的植被进行了采样。在每个象限中,我们统计了所有维管植物物种的活茎,但生长在重叠丛中的禾本科植物除外(Farnsworth
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response of a Wetland Plant Community to Management of Phragmites Australis (Poaceae) in Southwestern Connecticut
Many conservation organizations remove invasive plants with herbicides; however, few quantify the outcomes of management on the invaded plant community (Martin and Blossey 2013). Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. is a perennial grass, native to Eurasia, that is now found throughout temperate regions of North America in fresh water, brackish, and salt marsh environments (Meyerson et al. 2009). Despite considerable interest in the effects of P. australis on native wetland ecosystems, relatively little information exists on the efficacy of different management strategies and the response of plant communities to the removal of P. australis, especially over multiple years (Hazelton et al. 2014; Martin and Blossey 2013). We examined the efficacy and effects of removing Phragmites australis from the perimeter of a 1-hectare pond at Highstead Preserve in southwestern Connecticut (41.327, –73.394) over a six-year period (2012–2017). Prior to the study, P. australis covered 30% of the shoreline around the pond and formed several small (, 100 m), dense patches and one relatively large patch (~1300 m). We used vegetation monitoring and three different herbicide (Rodeot [53.8% glyphosate]) application techniques to treat P. australis: (1) handwipe 25% solution (leaves and upper half of stem wiped via cotton work glove worn over 15 mil nitrile glove); (2) wand 25% solution (leaves and upper half of stem wiped with long-handled brush applicator); and (3) spray 2.3% solution (whole plant with backpack sprayer). Prior to herbicide treatment in 2012, we sampled the pondside vegetation by randomly placing 28 quadrats 1 m in patches invaded by P. australis. In each quadrat, we counted live stems of all vascular plant species with the exception of graminoids that grew in overlapping clumps (Farnsworth
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhodora
Rhodora 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal is devoted primarily to the botany of North America and accepts scientific papers and notes relating to the systematics, floristics, ecology, paleobotany, or conservation biology of this or floristically related regions.
期刊最新文献
Lectotypification and an Emended Description of Rosa ×fernaldiorum Boletes in the Bronx and Beyond: A Study of Boletales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota, Fungi) Specimen Records of New York City NEBS Meeting News An Inventory of Connecticut's Primeval Forests The Globally Rare Aldrovanda vesiculosa (Droseraceae) New to New Hampshire, U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1