利用异构语言资源进行海事领域术语提取

IF 0.9 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Terminology Pub Date : 2021-09-10 DOI:10.1075/term.20024.and
Gisle Andersen
{"title":"利用异构语言资源进行海事领域术语提取","authors":"Gisle Andersen","doi":"10.1075/term.20024.and","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The development of terminologies for domains where these are lacking is a time-consuming and costly task. This\n article takes a methodological perspective and addresses a general methodological question: how can we, with limited funding,\n utilise to a maximal degree, existing language resources to create a terminology at a relatively low cost? Although an important\n player in the maritime industries for many centuries, Norway has not prioritised the systematic development of an official\n maritime terminology. The article therefore focuses specifically on efforts to develop a national resource for maritime domains.\n The article describes efforts to create a corpus of popular science and a parallel corpus of technical texts. Six different term\n extraction methods are applied. These include corpus-based statistical analyses of frequency, collocation and keyness, as well as\n bilingual term extraction. Finally, the pros and cons of each method are evaluated by means of a cost-benefit analysis.","PeriodicalId":44429,"journal":{"name":"Terminology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilising heterogeneous language resources for term extraction in maritime domains\",\"authors\":\"Gisle Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/term.20024.and\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The development of terminologies for domains where these are lacking is a time-consuming and costly task. This\\n article takes a methodological perspective and addresses a general methodological question: how can we, with limited funding,\\n utilise to a maximal degree, existing language resources to create a terminology at a relatively low cost? Although an important\\n player in the maritime industries for many centuries, Norway has not prioritised the systematic development of an official\\n maritime terminology. The article therefore focuses specifically on efforts to develop a national resource for maritime domains.\\n The article describes efforts to create a corpus of popular science and a parallel corpus of technical texts. Six different term\\n extraction methods are applied. These include corpus-based statistical analyses of frequency, collocation and keyness, as well as\\n bilingual term extraction. Finally, the pros and cons of each method are evaluated by means of a cost-benefit analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Terminology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Terminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/term.20024.and\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terminology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/term.20024.and","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为缺乏这些术语的领域开发术语是一项耗时且代价高昂的任务。本文从方法学的角度出发,解决了一个一般性的方法学问题:我们如何在资金有限的情况下,最大限度地利用现有的语言资源,以相对较低的成本创建术语?尽管挪威在许多世纪以来都是海运业的重要参与者,但挪威并没有优先考虑系统地发展官方海事术语。因此,本文特别侧重于开发海洋领域国家资源的努力。本文描述了创建一个科普语料库和一个平行的技术文本语料库的努力。应用了六种不同的术语提取方法。这些包括基于语料库的频率、搭配和关键字的统计分析,以及双语术语提取。最后,通过成本效益分析对每种方法的优缺点进行了评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilising heterogeneous language resources for term extraction in maritime domains
The development of terminologies for domains where these are lacking is a time-consuming and costly task. This article takes a methodological perspective and addresses a general methodological question: how can we, with limited funding, utilise to a maximal degree, existing language resources to create a terminology at a relatively low cost? Although an important player in the maritime industries for many centuries, Norway has not prioritised the systematic development of an official maritime terminology. The article therefore focuses specifically on efforts to develop a national resource for maritime domains. The article describes efforts to create a corpus of popular science and a parallel corpus of technical texts. Six different term extraction methods are applied. These include corpus-based statistical analyses of frequency, collocation and keyness, as well as bilingual term extraction. Finally, the pros and cons of each method are evaluated by means of a cost-benefit analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Terminology
Terminology Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Terminology is an independent journal with a cross-cultural and cross-disciplinary scope. It focusses on the discussion of (systematic) solutions not only of language problems encountered in translation, but also, for example, of (monolingual) problems of ambiguity, reference and developments in multidisciplinary communication. Particular attention will be given to new and developing subject areas such as knowledge representation and transfer, information technology tools, expert systems and terminological databases. Terminology encompasses terminology both in general (theory and practice) and in specialized fields (LSP), such as physics.
期刊最新文献
Metaphors for legal terms concerning vulnerable people Term circulation and connotation Climate knowledge or climate debate? Variation in psychopathological terminology Disability in EU’s institutional discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1