初级保健中非特定焦虑症的临床实践

PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences Pub Date : 2023-06-28 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1002/pcn5.118
Hitoshi Sakurai, Masahiro Takeshima, Ken Inada, Yumi Aoki, Kenya Ie, Morito Kise, Eriko Yoshida, Takashi Tsuboi, Hisashi Yamada, Hikaru Hori, Yasushi Inada, Eiji Shimizu, Kazuo Mishima, Koichiro Watanabe, Yoshikazu Takaesu
{"title":"初级保健中非特定焦虑症的临床实践","authors":"Hitoshi Sakurai, Masahiro Takeshima, Ken Inada, Yumi Aoki, Kenya Ie, Morito Kise, Eriko Yoshida, Takashi Tsuboi, Hisashi Yamada, Hikaru Hori, Yasushi Inada, Eiji Shimizu, Kazuo Mishima, Koichiro Watanabe, Yoshikazu Takaesu","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Clinicians face difficulties in making treatment decisions for unspecified anxiety disorder due to the absence of any treatment guidelines. The objective of this study was to investigate how familiar and how often primary care physicians use pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to manage the disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted among 117 primary care physicians in Japan who were asked to assess the familiarity of using each treatment option for unspecified anxiety disorder on a binary response scale (0 = \"unfamiliar,\" 1 = \"familiar\") and the frequency on a nine-point Likert scale (1 = \"never used,\" 9 = \"frequently used\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While several benzodiazepine anxiolytics were familiar to primary care physicians, the frequencies of prescribing them, including alprazolam (4.6 ± 2.6), ethyl loflazepate (3.6 ± 2.4), and clotiazepam (3.5 ± 2.3), were low. In contrast, certain nonpharmacological options, including lifestyle changes (5.4 ± 2.3), coping strategies (5.1 ± 2.7), and psychoeducation for anxiety (5.1 ± 2.7), were more commonly utilized, but to a modest extent. When a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug failed to be effective, primary care physicians selected the following management strategies to a relatively high degree: differential diagnosis (6.4 ± 2.4), referral to a specialist hospital (5.9 ± 2.5), lifestyle changes (5.2 ± 2.5), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (5.1 ± 2.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care physicians exercise caution when prescribing benzodiazepine anxiolytics for unspecified anxiety disorder. Nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRI are modestly employed as primary treatment options and alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics. To ensure the safe and effective treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder in primary care, more information should be provided from field experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"e118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical practice for unspecified anxiety disorder in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Hitoshi Sakurai, Masahiro Takeshima, Ken Inada, Yumi Aoki, Kenya Ie, Morito Kise, Eriko Yoshida, Takashi Tsuboi, Hisashi Yamada, Hikaru Hori, Yasushi Inada, Eiji Shimizu, Kazuo Mishima, Koichiro Watanabe, Yoshikazu Takaesu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pcn5.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Clinicians face difficulties in making treatment decisions for unspecified anxiety disorder due to the absence of any treatment guidelines. The objective of this study was to investigate how familiar and how often primary care physicians use pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to manage the disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted among 117 primary care physicians in Japan who were asked to assess the familiarity of using each treatment option for unspecified anxiety disorder on a binary response scale (0 = \\\"unfamiliar,\\\" 1 = \\\"familiar\\\") and the frequency on a nine-point Likert scale (1 = \\\"never used,\\\" 9 = \\\"frequently used\\\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While several benzodiazepine anxiolytics were familiar to primary care physicians, the frequencies of prescribing them, including alprazolam (4.6 ± 2.6), ethyl loflazepate (3.6 ± 2.4), and clotiazepam (3.5 ± 2.3), were low. In contrast, certain nonpharmacological options, including lifestyle changes (5.4 ± 2.3), coping strategies (5.1 ± 2.7), and psychoeducation for anxiety (5.1 ± 2.7), were more commonly utilized, but to a modest extent. When a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug failed to be effective, primary care physicians selected the following management strategies to a relatively high degree: differential diagnosis (6.4 ± 2.4), referral to a specialist hospital (5.9 ± 2.5), lifestyle changes (5.2 ± 2.5), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (5.1 ± 2.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care physicians exercise caution when prescribing benzodiazepine anxiolytics for unspecified anxiety disorder. Nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRI are modestly employed as primary treatment options and alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics. To ensure the safe and effective treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder in primary care, more information should be provided from field experts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114420/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于缺乏治疗指南,临床医生在对不明焦虑症做出治疗决定时面临困难。本研究旨在调查初级保健医生对使用药物和非药物方法治疗焦虑症的熟悉程度和使用频率:方法:我们对日本的 117 名初级保健医生进行了一项调查,要求他们以二元应答量表(0 ="不熟悉",1 ="熟悉")和九点李克特量表(1 ="从未使用",9 ="经常使用")来评估使用每种治疗方法治疗不明焦虑症的熟悉程度:虽然初级保健医生对几种苯二氮卓抗焦虑药并不陌生,但开具这些药物处方的频率却很低,其中包括阿普唑仑(4.6 ± 2.6)、洛氟西泮酸乙酯(3.6 ± 2.4)和氯硝西泮(3.5 ± 2.3)。相比之下,某些非药物治疗方案的使用率更高,包括改变生活方式(5.4 ± 2.3)、应对策略(5.1 ± 2.7)和焦虑心理教育(5.1 ± 2.7),但使用率不高。当苯二氮卓类抗焦虑药物无效时,初级保健医生选择以下管理策略的比例相对较高:鉴别诊断(6.4 ± 2.4)、转诊至专科医院(5.9 ± 2.5)、改变生活方式(5.2 ± 2.5)和改用选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(5.1 ± 2.4):结论:初级保健医生在为不明焦虑症患者开具苯二氮卓类抗焦虑药处方时应谨慎。非药物干预和改用 SSRI 可作为主要治疗方案和苯二氮卓抗焦虑药的替代药物。为确保在初级保健中安全有效地治疗不明焦虑症,应由相关领域的专家提供更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical practice for unspecified anxiety disorder in primary care.

Aim: Clinicians face difficulties in making treatment decisions for unspecified anxiety disorder due to the absence of any treatment guidelines. The objective of this study was to investigate how familiar and how often primary care physicians use pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches to manage the disorder.

Methods: A survey was conducted among 117 primary care physicians in Japan who were asked to assess the familiarity of using each treatment option for unspecified anxiety disorder on a binary response scale (0 = "unfamiliar," 1 = "familiar") and the frequency on a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "never used," 9 = "frequently used").

Results: While several benzodiazepine anxiolytics were familiar to primary care physicians, the frequencies of prescribing them, including alprazolam (4.6 ± 2.6), ethyl loflazepate (3.6 ± 2.4), and clotiazepam (3.5 ± 2.3), were low. In contrast, certain nonpharmacological options, including lifestyle changes (5.4 ± 2.3), coping strategies (5.1 ± 2.7), and psychoeducation for anxiety (5.1 ± 2.7), were more commonly utilized, but to a modest extent. When a benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug failed to be effective, primary care physicians selected the following management strategies to a relatively high degree: differential diagnosis (6.4 ± 2.4), referral to a specialist hospital (5.9 ± 2.5), lifestyle changes (5.2 ± 2.5), and switching to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (5.1 ± 2.4).

Conclusion: Primary care physicians exercise caution when prescribing benzodiazepine anxiolytics for unspecified anxiety disorder. Nonpharmacological interventions and switching to SSRI are modestly employed as primary treatment options and alternatives to benzodiazepine anxiolytics. To ensure the safe and effective treatment of unspecified anxiety disorder in primary care, more information should be provided from field experts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to outpatient care among individuals with pre-existing psychiatric disorders following the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake: A retrospective study. Middle-aged man with primary hyperparathyroidism-associated psychosis: A case report. Launching a child and adolescent psychiatry training program in Mongolia inspired by Japanese models. Long-term mental health crisis among municipal public employees caused by the Fukushima nuclear accident and subsequent disasters: Questionnaire survey 10 years postdisaster. Pivotal role of venous blood gas analysis in the detection of metabolic acidosis due to laxative abuse in an anorexia nervosa patient: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1