{"title":"拟阵中的超平面与选择公理","authors":"Marianne Morillon","doi":"10.14712/1213-7243.2023.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". We show that in set-theory without the axiom of choice ZF , the statement sH : (cid:16)Every proper closed subset of a (cid:28)nitary matroid is the intersection of hyperplanes including it(cid:17) implies AC fin , the axiom of choice for (nonempty) (cid:28)nite sets. We also provide an equivalent of the statement AC fin in terms of (cid:16)graphic(cid:17) matroids. Several open questions stay open in ZF , for example: does sH imply the Axiom of Choice?","PeriodicalId":44396,"journal":{"name":"Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hyperplanes in matroids and the axiom of choice\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Morillon\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/1213-7243.2023.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". We show that in set-theory without the axiom of choice ZF , the statement sH : (cid:16)Every proper closed subset of a (cid:28)nitary matroid is the intersection of hyperplanes including it(cid:17) implies AC fin , the axiom of choice for (nonempty) (cid:28)nite sets. We also provide an equivalent of the statement AC fin in terms of (cid:16)graphic(cid:17) matroids. Several open questions stay open in ZF , for example: does sH imply the Axiom of Choice?\",\"PeriodicalId\":44396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/1213-7243.2023.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/1213-7243.2023.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
. We show that in set-theory without the axiom of choice ZF , the statement sH : (cid:16)Every proper closed subset of a (cid:28)nitary matroid is the intersection of hyperplanes including it(cid:17) implies AC fin , the axiom of choice for (nonempty) (cid:28)nite sets. We also provide an equivalent of the statement AC fin in terms of (cid:16)graphic(cid:17) matroids. Several open questions stay open in ZF , for example: does sH imply the Axiom of Choice?