战略行动场视角下的可持续消费与生产

Q3 Social Sciences Ambiente e Sociedade Pub Date : 2020-08-03 DOI:10.1590/1809-4422asoc20190027r1vu2020l4ao
Érico Luciano Pagotto, S. Gonçalves-Dias
{"title":"战略行动场视角下的可持续消费与生产","authors":"Érico Luciano Pagotto, S. Gonçalves-Dias","doi":"10.1590/1809-4422asoc20190027r1vu2020l4ao","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyzes the process of construction of public policies of sustainable production and consumption in Brazil after the country joined the Marrakesh Process in 2003. Based on the strategic action fields perspective, we analyze the emergence of this field, its characteristics and their status through the collective action of their main social actors, their actions, interests and disputes. Empirical material for analysis included plans developed during the period, minutes of the meeting, documents submitted to the public consultation, responses provided by civil society after the consultation, as well as in-depth interviews. Evidence shows that a series of obstacles have been delaying further advances of the politics of sustainable production and consumption due to disputes between incumbents and challengers.","PeriodicalId":35241,"journal":{"name":"Ambiente e Sociedade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION FROM A STRATEGIC ACTION FIELD PERSPECTIVE\",\"authors\":\"Érico Luciano Pagotto, S. Gonçalves-Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1809-4422asoc20190027r1vu2020l4ao\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article analyzes the process of construction of public policies of sustainable production and consumption in Brazil after the country joined the Marrakesh Process in 2003. Based on the strategic action fields perspective, we analyze the emergence of this field, its characteristics and their status through the collective action of their main social actors, their actions, interests and disputes. Empirical material for analysis included plans developed during the period, minutes of the meeting, documents submitted to the public consultation, responses provided by civil society after the consultation, as well as in-depth interviews. Evidence shows that a series of obstacles have been delaying further advances of the politics of sustainable production and consumption due to disputes between incumbents and challengers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ambiente e Sociedade\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ambiente e Sociedade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20190027r1vu2020l4ao\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambiente e Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20190027r1vu2020l4ao","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文分析了2003年加入马拉喀什进程后,巴西可持续生产和消费公共政策的构建过程。基于战略行动场的视角,我们通过其主要社会行动者的集体行动、行动、利益和争端,分析了该领域的出现、特征及其地位。用于分析的经验材料包括在此期间制定的计划、会议记录、提交给公众咨询的文件、民间社会在咨询后提供的答复以及深入访谈。有证据表明,由于现任者和挑战者之间的争议,一系列障碍阻碍了可持续生产和消费政治的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION FROM A STRATEGIC ACTION FIELD PERSPECTIVE
Abstract This article analyzes the process of construction of public policies of sustainable production and consumption in Brazil after the country joined the Marrakesh Process in 2003. Based on the strategic action fields perspective, we analyze the emergence of this field, its characteristics and their status through the collective action of their main social actors, their actions, interests and disputes. Empirical material for analysis included plans developed during the period, minutes of the meeting, documents submitted to the public consultation, responses provided by civil society after the consultation, as well as in-depth interviews. Evidence shows that a series of obstacles have been delaying further advances of the politics of sustainable production and consumption due to disputes between incumbents and challengers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ambiente e Sociedade
Ambiente e Sociedade Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Ambiente & Sociedade é uma publicação cuatrimestral da ANPPAS-Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ambiente e Sociedade, que busca contribuir con la producción del conocimiento en la interfaz de las cuestiones del Ambiente y la Sociedad. Publica textos de colaboradores nacionales e internacionales, mediante evaluación de los editores y pareceres emitidos por asesores ad hoc. La revista publica artículos teóricos y reseñas de libros inéditos em el área interdisciplinar que trata del proceso de interacción entre Sociedad y Medio Ambiente.
期刊最新文献
O que faz uma comunicação de risco ser eficiente? A visão dos envolvidos Zonas de Sacrificio y Recuperación Socioambiental en Chile: Fallas y oportunidades de la política ambiental Panorama das Leis de Agricultura Urbana no Brasil: Relações com o Planejamento Urbano At the limits of sustainability: Exploring extended producer responsibility in the management of agrochemical packaging Overview of Laws for Urban Agriculture in Brazil: Association with Urban Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1