{"title":"远程医疗:现状与未来展望","authors":"Andrea Tinnirello","doi":"10.7175/cmi.v15i1.1511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"41 Using a widely available technology (a computer with a webcam and dedicated platforms that can ensure patients’ data safety), a virtual consultation can be established between patient and clinicians in total safety. Besides the evident convenience for patients (who can overcome the travel and parking issues and are not required to find an accompanying person), telemedicine offers some peculiar advantages, such as: y getting a more informal assessment of mental status thanks to the opportunity to observe patients in their home environment; y gather other social information, e.g.: y living environment; y interactions with family and caregivers; y patients’ lives at home [11]. The most significant question is whether telemedicine is comparable (“as good as”) to in person consultation in terms of outcomes and quality. In some non-inferiority studies, tele-psychiatric outcomes were deemed as not inferior to in person care in terms of diagnosis and treatment, decreasing length of hospital stays, improving medication adherence, and reducing symptoms in conditions such as posttraumatic stress disorder on an evidenced based level [2]. Unfortunately, this comparison has not been made in other specialties. Despite its attractivity, this tool has some obvious limitations: Telemedicine and telehealth are often considered synonyms, but while telemedicine refers particularly to clinical patient care, telehealth includes all the educational, administrative, and other non-clinical healthcare activities. Although the roots of telemedicine date quite far back, the modern era of telemedicine started in 1968: in that date, the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) became the first hospital-based multispecialty telemedicine practice offering remote clinical examinations to travelers and airport workers at Logan International Airport [1]. Historically, telemedicine has been applied in several medical specialties such as psychiatry, cardiology, pediatrics, gynecology, geriatrics, with general patient satisfaction [2-9]. With the evolving technology, more specific applications of telemedicine have been developed, e.g., tele-dermatoscopes (pecific general patient cameras mounted on webcams or smartphones and controlled by app) have been used to monitor skin lesions [10]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has been increasingly used to bypass the severe restrictions for outpatients’ visits and access to hospitals. As often happens, an urgent need (in this case the necessity to guarantee follow up for patients suffering from chronic conditions who cannot postpone their visits) became the driving force to rapidly develop and implement telemedicine and telehealth systems. Editorial","PeriodicalId":40270,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Management Issues","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine: Current Status and Future Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Tinnirello\",\"doi\":\"10.7175/cmi.v15i1.1511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"41 Using a widely available technology (a computer with a webcam and dedicated platforms that can ensure patients’ data safety), a virtual consultation can be established between patient and clinicians in total safety. Besides the evident convenience for patients (who can overcome the travel and parking issues and are not required to find an accompanying person), telemedicine offers some peculiar advantages, such as: y getting a more informal assessment of mental status thanks to the opportunity to observe patients in their home environment; y gather other social information, e.g.: y living environment; y interactions with family and caregivers; y patients’ lives at home [11]. The most significant question is whether telemedicine is comparable (“as good as”) to in person consultation in terms of outcomes and quality. In some non-inferiority studies, tele-psychiatric outcomes were deemed as not inferior to in person care in terms of diagnosis and treatment, decreasing length of hospital stays, improving medication adherence, and reducing symptoms in conditions such as posttraumatic stress disorder on an evidenced based level [2]. Unfortunately, this comparison has not been made in other specialties. Despite its attractivity, this tool has some obvious limitations: Telemedicine and telehealth are often considered synonyms, but while telemedicine refers particularly to clinical patient care, telehealth includes all the educational, administrative, and other non-clinical healthcare activities. Although the roots of telemedicine date quite far back, the modern era of telemedicine started in 1968: in that date, the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) became the first hospital-based multispecialty telemedicine practice offering remote clinical examinations to travelers and airport workers at Logan International Airport [1]. Historically, telemedicine has been applied in several medical specialties such as psychiatry, cardiology, pediatrics, gynecology, geriatrics, with general patient satisfaction [2-9]. With the evolving technology, more specific applications of telemedicine have been developed, e.g., tele-dermatoscopes (pecific general patient cameras mounted on webcams or smartphones and controlled by app) have been used to monitor skin lesions [10]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has been increasingly used to bypass the severe restrictions for outpatients’ visits and access to hospitals. As often happens, an urgent need (in this case the necessity to guarantee follow up for patients suffering from chronic conditions who cannot postpone their visits) became the driving force to rapidly develop and implement telemedicine and telehealth systems. Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":40270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Management Issues\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Management Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7175/cmi.v15i1.1511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Management Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7175/cmi.v15i1.1511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Telemedicine: Current Status and Future Perspectives
41 Using a widely available technology (a computer with a webcam and dedicated platforms that can ensure patients’ data safety), a virtual consultation can be established between patient and clinicians in total safety. Besides the evident convenience for patients (who can overcome the travel and parking issues and are not required to find an accompanying person), telemedicine offers some peculiar advantages, such as: y getting a more informal assessment of mental status thanks to the opportunity to observe patients in their home environment; y gather other social information, e.g.: y living environment; y interactions with family and caregivers; y patients’ lives at home [11]. The most significant question is whether telemedicine is comparable (“as good as”) to in person consultation in terms of outcomes and quality. In some non-inferiority studies, tele-psychiatric outcomes were deemed as not inferior to in person care in terms of diagnosis and treatment, decreasing length of hospital stays, improving medication adherence, and reducing symptoms in conditions such as posttraumatic stress disorder on an evidenced based level [2]. Unfortunately, this comparison has not been made in other specialties. Despite its attractivity, this tool has some obvious limitations: Telemedicine and telehealth are often considered synonyms, but while telemedicine refers particularly to clinical patient care, telehealth includes all the educational, administrative, and other non-clinical healthcare activities. Although the roots of telemedicine date quite far back, the modern era of telemedicine started in 1968: in that date, the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) became the first hospital-based multispecialty telemedicine practice offering remote clinical examinations to travelers and airport workers at Logan International Airport [1]. Historically, telemedicine has been applied in several medical specialties such as psychiatry, cardiology, pediatrics, gynecology, geriatrics, with general patient satisfaction [2-9]. With the evolving technology, more specific applications of telemedicine have been developed, e.g., tele-dermatoscopes (pecific general patient cameras mounted on webcams or smartphones and controlled by app) have been used to monitor skin lesions [10]. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has been increasingly used to bypass the severe restrictions for outpatients’ visits and access to hospitals. As often happens, an urgent need (in this case the necessity to guarantee follow up for patients suffering from chronic conditions who cannot postpone their visits) became the driving force to rapidly develop and implement telemedicine and telehealth systems. Editorial
期刊介绍:
Clinical Management Issues is an open access, peer-reviewed journal published by SEEd Medical Publishers (online ISSN = 2283-3137). The aim of the published case reports is to expand medical knowledge, allowing a better explanation of the practical application of a clinical guideline, or including an up-to-date review of medical knowledge in that field, or helping doctors to make better decisions in a “grey area”, or explaining how to manage a disease with an integrated approach between different specialists involved. Clinical Management Issues also publishes unusual case reports (i.e. unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications, unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease, etc.), articles on clinical management of a disease, case series, editorials, and brief reports. Acceptance rate of submitted articles is about 90%. Content is subject to peer-review and is editorially independent. This journal provides immediate open access to all of its articles (both HTML and PDF versions). Authors are asked to state any professional and financial situations that might be perceived as causing a conflict of interest with respect to integrity of content. The Declaration of Financial Competing Interests, that should be filled, signed and sent to the Publisher, is downloadable here.