芬兰基础教育背景下世界观对话的理解与实施:教师的方法

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1080/15507394.2022.2060691
Tuuli Lipiäinen, Henri Satokangas, Anita Jantunen, Arto Kallioniemi
{"title":"芬兰基础教育背景下世界观对话的理解与实施:教师的方法","authors":"Tuuli Lipiäinen, Henri Satokangas, Anita Jantunen, Arto Kallioniemi","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2022.2060691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research examined worldview dialogue in Finnish basic education by focusing on teachers’ understanding about this dialogue, and orientations to implement it in schools. The data of the study consisted of an electrical survey from in-service basic education teachers from all areas in Finland (N = 654). The research was conducted as qualitative content analysis, using open coding and then quantitative methods. Found orientations were active, indirect and passive. The results showed that orientations presented different ways of understanding the concept of worldview and worldview dialogue. Understanding and implementing worldview dialogue varies between teachers and between levels at which they teach.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"254 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding and Implementing Worldview Dialogue in the Finnish Basic Education Context: Teachers’ Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Tuuli Lipiäinen, Henri Satokangas, Anita Jantunen, Arto Kallioniemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15507394.2022.2060691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This research examined worldview dialogue in Finnish basic education by focusing on teachers’ understanding about this dialogue, and orientations to implement it in schools. The data of the study consisted of an electrical survey from in-service basic education teachers from all areas in Finland (N = 654). The research was conducted as qualitative content analysis, using open coding and then quantitative methods. Found orientations were active, indirect and passive. The results showed that orientations presented different ways of understanding the concept of worldview and worldview dialogue. Understanding and implementing worldview dialogue varies between teachers and between levels at which they teach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion & Education\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"254 - 272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2060691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2060691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了芬兰基础教育中的世界观对话,重点关注教师对这种对话的理解,以及在学校中实施这种对话的方向。该研究的数据包括芬兰所有地区在职基础教育教师(N = 654)的电气调查。研究首先进行定性内容分析,然后采用开放编码和定量方法。取向有主动取向、间接取向和被动取向。结果表明,取向对世界观概念和世界观对话的理解方式不同。对世界观对话的理解和实施因教师和教学水平而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding and Implementing Worldview Dialogue in the Finnish Basic Education Context: Teachers’ Approaches
Abstract This research examined worldview dialogue in Finnish basic education by focusing on teachers’ understanding about this dialogue, and orientations to implement it in schools. The data of the study consisted of an electrical survey from in-service basic education teachers from all areas in Finland (N = 654). The research was conducted as qualitative content analysis, using open coding and then quantitative methods. Found orientations were active, indirect and passive. The results showed that orientations presented different ways of understanding the concept of worldview and worldview dialogue. Understanding and implementing worldview dialogue varies between teachers and between levels at which they teach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1