中学生在科学学习中的VARK感觉偏好:它们可靠吗?

IF 0.2 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Periodico Tche Quimica Pub Date : 2020-12-20 DOI:10.52571/ptq.v17.n36.2020.455_periodico36_pgs_440_456.pdf
E. Torres, Joan Josep Solaz Portolés, V. S. López
{"title":"中学生在科学学习中的VARK感觉偏好:它们可靠吗?","authors":"E. Torres, Joan Josep Solaz Portolés, V. S. López","doi":"10.52571/ptq.v17.n36.2020.455_periodico36_pgs_440_456.pdf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nStudents’ sensory preferences (SP), that is, the ways or channels they prefer to receive the information, have been proposed as personal factors influencing science learning. Some studies relate improvement in learning to the adequacy of instructional resources to individual SP. A widely used instrument to determine SP is the VARK questionnaire. However, the individual SP has to be reliable to be considered useful to improve instruction. There are not enough studies on the reliability of this questionnaire. This study aimed to assess the reliability (temporal stability) of SP, as measured by the VARK instrument. Also, the reliability of the student’s subjective perception of his/her personal SP was evaluated. A mixed methodology was used, combining techniques for obtaining both quantitative and qualitative information. The sample was made of 582 male and female students, from 7th to 11th grades. The questionnaire was administered twice to a subsample of students, with a few months’ delay. Besides, a small group of students was interviewed. In the analysis of the results, using chi-square tests (X2) and a repeated measure MANCOVA, no massive permanent changes in the group distribution of SP were found along with secondary education. This would be useful for teachers to adapt learning materials to their students’ preferences. The individual SP was stable enough under a permissive criterion, but not when a stricter standard was used. Besides, the reliability of students’ self-perception of SP was low.\n","PeriodicalId":45103,"journal":{"name":"Periodico Tche Quimica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SECONDARY STUDENTS’ VARK SENSORY PREFERENCES IN SCIENCE LEARNING: ARE THEY RELIABLE?\",\"authors\":\"E. Torres, Joan Josep Solaz Portolés, V. S. López\",\"doi\":\"10.52571/ptq.v17.n36.2020.455_periodico36_pgs_440_456.pdf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nStudents’ sensory preferences (SP), that is, the ways or channels they prefer to receive the information, have been proposed as personal factors influencing science learning. Some studies relate improvement in learning to the adequacy of instructional resources to individual SP. A widely used instrument to determine SP is the VARK questionnaire. However, the individual SP has to be reliable to be considered useful to improve instruction. There are not enough studies on the reliability of this questionnaire. This study aimed to assess the reliability (temporal stability) of SP, as measured by the VARK instrument. Also, the reliability of the student’s subjective perception of his/her personal SP was evaluated. A mixed methodology was used, combining techniques for obtaining both quantitative and qualitative information. The sample was made of 582 male and female students, from 7th to 11th grades. The questionnaire was administered twice to a subsample of students, with a few months’ delay. Besides, a small group of students was interviewed. In the analysis of the results, using chi-square tests (X2) and a repeated measure MANCOVA, no massive permanent changes in the group distribution of SP were found along with secondary education. This would be useful for teachers to adapt learning materials to their students’ preferences. The individual SP was stable enough under a permissive criterion, but not when a stricter standard was used. Besides, the reliability of students’ self-perception of SP was low.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodico Tche Quimica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodico Tche Quimica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52571/ptq.v17.n36.2020.455_periodico36_pgs_440_456.pdf\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodico Tche Quimica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52571/ptq.v17.n36.2020.455_periodico36_pgs_440_456.pdf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

学生的感官偏好(SP),即他们喜欢接受信息的方式或渠道,被认为是影响科学学习的个人因素。一些研究将学习的改善与个体SP的教学资源的充分性联系起来。一个广泛使用的确定SP的工具是VARK问卷。然而,个体SP必须是可靠的,才能被认为对改进教学有用。目前对该问卷的可靠性研究还不够。本研究旨在评估通过VARK仪器测量的SP的可靠性(时间稳定性)。同时,评估学生对个人SP主观知觉的信度。使用了一种混合的方法,结合了获得定量和定性信息的技术。样本由582名从7年级到11年级的男女学生组成。问卷调查对学生的子样本进行了两次,每隔几个月进行一次。此外,我们还采访了一小部分学生。在对结果进行分析时,使用卡方检验(X2)和重复测量MANCOVA,没有发现SP的群体分布随着中等教育而发生大规模的永久性变化。这将有助于教师根据学生的喜好调整学习材料。在宽松的标准下,个体SP足够稳定,但在使用更严格的标准时就不稳定了。此外,学生自我知觉的信度较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SECONDARY STUDENTS’ VARK SENSORY PREFERENCES IN SCIENCE LEARNING: ARE THEY RELIABLE?
Students’ sensory preferences (SP), that is, the ways or channels they prefer to receive the information, have been proposed as personal factors influencing science learning. Some studies relate improvement in learning to the adequacy of instructional resources to individual SP. A widely used instrument to determine SP is the VARK questionnaire. However, the individual SP has to be reliable to be considered useful to improve instruction. There are not enough studies on the reliability of this questionnaire. This study aimed to assess the reliability (temporal stability) of SP, as measured by the VARK instrument. Also, the reliability of the student’s subjective perception of his/her personal SP was evaluated. A mixed methodology was used, combining techniques for obtaining both quantitative and qualitative information. The sample was made of 582 male and female students, from 7th to 11th grades. The questionnaire was administered twice to a subsample of students, with a few months’ delay. Besides, a small group of students was interviewed. In the analysis of the results, using chi-square tests (X2) and a repeated measure MANCOVA, no massive permanent changes in the group distribution of SP were found along with secondary education. This would be useful for teachers to adapt learning materials to their students’ preferences. The individual SP was stable enough under a permissive criterion, but not when a stricter standard was used. Besides, the reliability of students’ self-perception of SP was low.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Periodico Tche Quimica
Periodico Tche Quimica CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, short communications (scientific publications), book reviews, forum articles, announcements or letters as well as interviews. Researchers from all countries are invited to publish on its pages.
期刊最新文献
INFLUENCE OF SYNTHESIS TIME IN THE PROPERTIES OF PtRu/CARBON HYBRIDS PREPARED BY HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION METHOD IoT-BASED AGRICULTURE ENVIRONMENT AND SECURITY MONITORING SYSTEM STUDY ON EUTROPHICATION CHANGE AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES IN PALIASTOMI LAKE AUTOMATION OF CHLORINE DOSAGE ADJUSTMENT CALCULATION IN DEEP TUBULAR WATER WELLS USING A JAVASCRIPT AND HTML SCRIPT POSSIBILITIES OF ENERGY RECOVERY FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1