{"title":"劳特利奇国际幼儿教育和保育宗教场所手册","authors":"T. Lovat","doi":"10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Arniika Kuusisto and her colleague authors address in this handbook one of the burning questions that educators everywhere in this age of rationalisation – and the persistent testing and measuring that accompany it – need to answer. Has education lost something vital to the human condition, including the role of imagination and wonder? Has the belief in the rationalistic creed of evidential learning and the empirical verification that is seen to deliver it, alongside the consequent quest for achieving ever greater international literacy and numeracy rates, resulted in a loss to education? Have we lost an element of knowing and learning that speaks to what is best about the human condition? Jurgen Habermas thinks so and so, it seems, do Kuusisto and her colleagues who speak to this within this volume of collected essays. Professor Kuusisto asks whether we have reserved ‘. . . too narrow a space for children’s life questions, wonder and awe? Do we also provide a place for children’s meaning-making, philosophising, construction of personal view of the world (worldview) and reflections on their place in it?’ (519). If we have indeed reserved overly narrow space for these things, it is because we have assumed – like many of our nineteenth-century ancestor scientists and social scientists – that religion, and hence religious and theological knowing, constitute nothing more important than options for those who choose the path of religious faith. As such, religious and theological knowing is a pseudo knowing reserved for indoctrination and not for the serious business of modern education. Kuusisto positions against this view as she proffers as follows:","PeriodicalId":46368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Religious Education","volume":"45 1","pages":"217 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Routledge International Handbook of the Place of Religion in Early Childhood Education and Care\",\"authors\":\"T. Lovat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professor Arniika Kuusisto and her colleague authors address in this handbook one of the burning questions that educators everywhere in this age of rationalisation – and the persistent testing and measuring that accompany it – need to answer. Has education lost something vital to the human condition, including the role of imagination and wonder? Has the belief in the rationalistic creed of evidential learning and the empirical verification that is seen to deliver it, alongside the consequent quest for achieving ever greater international literacy and numeracy rates, resulted in a loss to education? Have we lost an element of knowing and learning that speaks to what is best about the human condition? Jurgen Habermas thinks so and so, it seems, do Kuusisto and her colleagues who speak to this within this volume of collected essays. Professor Kuusisto asks whether we have reserved ‘. . . too narrow a space for children’s life questions, wonder and awe? Do we also provide a place for children’s meaning-making, philosophising, construction of personal view of the world (worldview) and reflections on their place in it?’ (519). If we have indeed reserved overly narrow space for these things, it is because we have assumed – like many of our nineteenth-century ancestor scientists and social scientists – that religion, and hence religious and theological knowing, constitute nothing more important than options for those who choose the path of religious faith. As such, religious and theological knowing is a pseudo knowing reserved for indoctrination and not for the serious business of modern education. Kuusisto positions against this view as she proffers as follows:\",\"PeriodicalId\":46368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Religious Education\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"217 - 218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Religious Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Religious Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Routledge International Handbook of the Place of Religion in Early Childhood Education and Care
Professor Arniika Kuusisto and her colleague authors address in this handbook one of the burning questions that educators everywhere in this age of rationalisation – and the persistent testing and measuring that accompany it – need to answer. Has education lost something vital to the human condition, including the role of imagination and wonder? Has the belief in the rationalistic creed of evidential learning and the empirical verification that is seen to deliver it, alongside the consequent quest for achieving ever greater international literacy and numeracy rates, resulted in a loss to education? Have we lost an element of knowing and learning that speaks to what is best about the human condition? Jurgen Habermas thinks so and so, it seems, do Kuusisto and her colleagues who speak to this within this volume of collected essays. Professor Kuusisto asks whether we have reserved ‘. . . too narrow a space for children’s life questions, wonder and awe? Do we also provide a place for children’s meaning-making, philosophising, construction of personal view of the world (worldview) and reflections on their place in it?’ (519). If we have indeed reserved overly narrow space for these things, it is because we have assumed – like many of our nineteenth-century ancestor scientists and social scientists – that religion, and hence religious and theological knowing, constitute nothing more important than options for those who choose the path of religious faith. As such, religious and theological knowing is a pseudo knowing reserved for indoctrination and not for the serious business of modern education. Kuusisto positions against this view as she proffers as follows:
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Religious Education (BJRE) is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a pedigree stretching back to 1934 when it began life as Religion in Education. In 1961 the title was changed to Learning for Living, and the present title was adopted in 1978. It is the leading journal in Britain for the dissemination of international research in religion and education and for the scholarly discussion of issues concerning religion and education internationally. The British Journal of Religious Education promotes research which contributes to our understanding of the relationship between religion and education in all phases of formal and non-formal educational settings. BJRE publishes articles which are national, international and transnational in scope from researchers working in any discipline whose work informs debate in religious education. Topics might include religious education policy curriculum and pedagogy, research on religion and young people, or the influence of religion(s) and non-religious worldviews upon the educational process as a whole.