劳特利奇国际幼儿教育和保育宗教场所手册

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH British Journal of Religious Education Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200
T. Lovat
{"title":"劳特利奇国际幼儿教育和保育宗教场所手册","authors":"T. Lovat","doi":"10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professor Arniika Kuusisto and her colleague authors address in this handbook one of the burning questions that educators everywhere in this age of rationalisation – and the persistent testing and measuring that accompany it – need to answer. Has education lost something vital to the human condition, including the role of imagination and wonder? Has the belief in the rationalistic creed of evidential learning and the empirical verification that is seen to deliver it, alongside the consequent quest for achieving ever greater international literacy and numeracy rates, resulted in a loss to education? Have we lost an element of knowing and learning that speaks to what is best about the human condition? Jurgen Habermas thinks so and so, it seems, do Kuusisto and her colleagues who speak to this within this volume of collected essays. Professor Kuusisto asks whether we have reserved ‘. . . too narrow a space for children’s life questions, wonder and awe? Do we also provide a place for children’s meaning-making, philosophising, construction of personal view of the world (worldview) and reflections on their place in it?’ (519). If we have indeed reserved overly narrow space for these things, it is because we have assumed – like many of our nineteenth-century ancestor scientists and social scientists – that religion, and hence religious and theological knowing, constitute nothing more important than options for those who choose the path of religious faith. As such, religious and theological knowing is a pseudo knowing reserved for indoctrination and not for the serious business of modern education. Kuusisto positions against this view as she proffers as follows:","PeriodicalId":46368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Religious Education","volume":"45 1","pages":"217 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Routledge International Handbook of the Place of Religion in Early Childhood Education and Care\",\"authors\":\"T. Lovat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professor Arniika Kuusisto and her colleague authors address in this handbook one of the burning questions that educators everywhere in this age of rationalisation – and the persistent testing and measuring that accompany it – need to answer. Has education lost something vital to the human condition, including the role of imagination and wonder? Has the belief in the rationalistic creed of evidential learning and the empirical verification that is seen to deliver it, alongside the consequent quest for achieving ever greater international literacy and numeracy rates, resulted in a loss to education? Have we lost an element of knowing and learning that speaks to what is best about the human condition? Jurgen Habermas thinks so and so, it seems, do Kuusisto and her colleagues who speak to this within this volume of collected essays. Professor Kuusisto asks whether we have reserved ‘. . . too narrow a space for children’s life questions, wonder and awe? Do we also provide a place for children’s meaning-making, philosophising, construction of personal view of the world (worldview) and reflections on their place in it?’ (519). If we have indeed reserved overly narrow space for these things, it is because we have assumed – like many of our nineteenth-century ancestor scientists and social scientists – that religion, and hence religious and theological knowing, constitute nothing more important than options for those who choose the path of religious faith. As such, religious and theological knowing is a pseudo knowing reserved for indoctrination and not for the serious business of modern education. Kuusisto positions against this view as she proffers as follows:\",\"PeriodicalId\":46368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Religious Education\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"217 - 218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Religious Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Religious Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2022.2148200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Routledge International Handbook of the Place of Religion in Early Childhood Education and Care
Professor Arniika Kuusisto and her colleague authors address in this handbook one of the burning questions that educators everywhere in this age of rationalisation – and the persistent testing and measuring that accompany it – need to answer. Has education lost something vital to the human condition, including the role of imagination and wonder? Has the belief in the rationalistic creed of evidential learning and the empirical verification that is seen to deliver it, alongside the consequent quest for achieving ever greater international literacy and numeracy rates, resulted in a loss to education? Have we lost an element of knowing and learning that speaks to what is best about the human condition? Jurgen Habermas thinks so and so, it seems, do Kuusisto and her colleagues who speak to this within this volume of collected essays. Professor Kuusisto asks whether we have reserved ‘. . . too narrow a space for children’s life questions, wonder and awe? Do we also provide a place for children’s meaning-making, philosophising, construction of personal view of the world (worldview) and reflections on their place in it?’ (519). If we have indeed reserved overly narrow space for these things, it is because we have assumed – like many of our nineteenth-century ancestor scientists and social scientists – that religion, and hence religious and theological knowing, constitute nothing more important than options for those who choose the path of religious faith. As such, religious and theological knowing is a pseudo knowing reserved for indoctrination and not for the serious business of modern education. Kuusisto positions against this view as she proffers as follows:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Religious Education (BJRE) is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a pedigree stretching back to 1934 when it began life as Religion in Education. In 1961 the title was changed to Learning for Living, and the present title was adopted in 1978. It is the leading journal in Britain for the dissemination of international research in religion and education and for the scholarly discussion of issues concerning religion and education internationally. The British Journal of Religious Education promotes research which contributes to our understanding of the relationship between religion and education in all phases of formal and non-formal educational settings. BJRE publishes articles which are national, international and transnational in scope from researchers working in any discipline whose work informs debate in religious education. Topics might include religious education policy curriculum and pedagogy, research on religion and young people, or the influence of religion(s) and non-religious worldviews upon the educational process as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Genders, sexualities, and Catholic schools: towards a theological anthropology of adolescent flourishing Analyzing Pakistan’s national curriculum textbooks in religious-based construction and demonisation of ‘other’ for high schools Cultivating a just habitus through intercultural wisdom of women Struggling for relevance: exploring editors’ perceived importance and value of religious education in school Rear-mirror view: representation of Islam and Muslims in the RE textbooks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1