朝鲜早期对坚贞佛教的伪装赞助:苏叶王后(1437-1504)与世宗时期的佛教争论

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Religions Pub Date : 2021-11-05 DOI:10.1353/jkr.2021.0005
Sung-ik Yoon
{"title":"朝鲜早期对坚贞佛教的伪装赞助:苏叶王后(1437-1504)与世宗时期的佛教争论","authors":"Sung-ik Yoon","doi":"10.1353/jkr.2021.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The aim of this essay to indicate factors affecting political decisions concerning Buddhism in King Sŏngjong's reign (1469–1494). It begins by pointing out that Sŏngjong, long reputed as an exemplary Confucian monarch and known for his particular antipathy to Buddhism, neither had much interest in persecuting the buddha-worshipping religion nor made it his priority to promote Confucianism. In fact, he and his entourage were mainly concerned with maintaining political stability in their regime. Thus, they were aware that if the state severed its ties with Buddhism, they risked losing the support and loyalty of the people under their rule. The Buddhist controversy consisting of four major debates between Queen Sohye, the Buddhist queen mother, and Confucian scholar-officials and students of the Royal Confucian Academy (Sŏnggyun'gwan 成均館) was the site where such concerns and notions were revealed. By closely examining the four rounds of controversy, this essay indicates that the nature of rumor, legitimacy, legality, and the moral universe were at play and analyzes how they influenced, motivated, and pressured the participants as they negotiated for more desirable terms. In this way, we can make sense of why Sŏngjong always tried very hard to find ways to dismiss attempts by Confucian ideologues to disadvantage Buddhism, and to harm Buddhism as little as possible. Finally, this essay argues that in the early Chosŏn period, the state was divorced from Buddhism in a sense that it was not able to freely and directly support and sponsor the religion.","PeriodicalId":42017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Religions","volume":"12 1","pages":"35 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Disguised Sponsorship for Tenacious Buddhism in Early Chosŏn Korea: Queen Sohye (1437–1504) and the Buddhist Controversy in the Reign of King Sŏngjong\",\"authors\":\"Sung-ik Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jkr.2021.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The aim of this essay to indicate factors affecting political decisions concerning Buddhism in King Sŏngjong's reign (1469–1494). It begins by pointing out that Sŏngjong, long reputed as an exemplary Confucian monarch and known for his particular antipathy to Buddhism, neither had much interest in persecuting the buddha-worshipping religion nor made it his priority to promote Confucianism. In fact, he and his entourage were mainly concerned with maintaining political stability in their regime. Thus, they were aware that if the state severed its ties with Buddhism, they risked losing the support and loyalty of the people under their rule. The Buddhist controversy consisting of four major debates between Queen Sohye, the Buddhist queen mother, and Confucian scholar-officials and students of the Royal Confucian Academy (Sŏnggyun'gwan 成均館) was the site where such concerns and notions were revealed. By closely examining the four rounds of controversy, this essay indicates that the nature of rumor, legitimacy, legality, and the moral universe were at play and analyzes how they influenced, motivated, and pressured the participants as they negotiated for more desirable terms. In this way, we can make sense of why Sŏngjong always tried very hard to find ways to dismiss attempts by Confucian ideologues to disadvantage Buddhism, and to harm Buddhism as little as possible. Finally, this essay argues that in the early Chosŏn period, the state was divorced from Buddhism in a sense that it was not able to freely and directly support and sponsor the religion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Religions\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"35 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2021.0005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2021.0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文旨在揭示影响Sŏngjong国王统治时期(1469-1494)佛教政治决策的因素。文章一开始就指出Sŏngjong,这位长期以来被认为是儒家君主的典范,并以他对佛教的特别反感而闻名,他既没有太多兴趣迫害崇拜佛教的宗教,也没有把推广儒家思想作为他的首要任务。事实上,他和他的随从们主要关心的是维持政权的政治稳定。因此,他们意识到,如果国家切断与佛教的联系,他们就有可能失去其统治下人民的支持和忠诚。佛教徒之间的争议包括四个主要争论Sohye女王,佛教太后,儒家葛洪皇家孔教学院和学生(Sŏnggyun 'gwan成均館)是地方问题和观念等。通过仔细研究这四个回合的争议,本文指出了谣言的性质、合法性、合法性和道德世界在发挥作用,并分析了它们如何影响、激励和施压参与者,因为他们谈判更理想的条件。通过这种方式,我们可以理解为什么Sŏngjong总是非常努力地寻找方法来驳斥儒家思想家对佛教不利的企图,并尽可能少地伤害佛教。最后,本文认为在Chosŏn早期,国家与佛教的分离在某种意义上是无法自由直接地支持和赞助宗教的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Disguised Sponsorship for Tenacious Buddhism in Early Chosŏn Korea: Queen Sohye (1437–1504) and the Buddhist Controversy in the Reign of King Sŏngjong
Abstract:The aim of this essay to indicate factors affecting political decisions concerning Buddhism in King Sŏngjong's reign (1469–1494). It begins by pointing out that Sŏngjong, long reputed as an exemplary Confucian monarch and known for his particular antipathy to Buddhism, neither had much interest in persecuting the buddha-worshipping religion nor made it his priority to promote Confucianism. In fact, he and his entourage were mainly concerned with maintaining political stability in their regime. Thus, they were aware that if the state severed its ties with Buddhism, they risked losing the support and loyalty of the people under their rule. The Buddhist controversy consisting of four major debates between Queen Sohye, the Buddhist queen mother, and Confucian scholar-officials and students of the Royal Confucian Academy (Sŏnggyun'gwan 成均館) was the site where such concerns and notions were revealed. By closely examining the four rounds of controversy, this essay indicates that the nature of rumor, legitimacy, legality, and the moral universe were at play and analyzes how they influenced, motivated, and pressured the participants as they negotiated for more desirable terms. In this way, we can make sense of why Sŏngjong always tried very hard to find ways to dismiss attempts by Confucian ideologues to disadvantage Buddhism, and to harm Buddhism as little as possible. Finally, this essay argues that in the early Chosŏn period, the state was divorced from Buddhism in a sense that it was not able to freely and directly support and sponsor the religion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Talismans ( pujŏk 符籍) for Rebirth in Chosŏn Buddhist Rituals and their Earlier Traces in China Talismans ( pujŏk 符籍) for Rebirth in Chosŏn Buddhist Rituals and their Earlier Traces in China Religion and the Cold War: A View from Korea Buddhist Rituals of Ch'ilsŏng, the Seven Stars of the Great Dipper, in Chosŏn Korea Practicing Motherhood and Forming Matrilineal Solidarity: A Counter-cultural Response to the Patrilineal Confucian Family in the Works of Park Wansuh (1931–2011)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1