技术升级的融资选择:来自泰国企业访谈的证据

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Southeast Asian Economies Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1355/ae39-1d
Hikari Ishido, Licheng Liang, Benjalux Sakunasingha
{"title":"技术升级的融资选择:来自泰国企业访谈的证据","authors":"Hikari Ishido, Licheng Liang, Benjalux Sakunasingha","doi":"10.1355/ae39-1d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This research investigates the significance of technological innovation for Thailand's industrial development through equity participation in the form of foreign direct investment (FDI). The pecking order theory suggests that to finance technological upgrading, firms tend to prioritize internal funding, and use debt and equity financing as the last resort. In the context of incessant technological change, however, equity financing might be a better choice. This research highlights some aspects of how that is the case by analysing firm-level performance data from Thailand and then conducting in-depth interviews with top executives from several companies located in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). We find that the conventional pecking order theory does not hold when it comes to external financing decisions. The interview insights reveal that, while a majority of companies prioritize internal financing, capturing technology (as intangible assets) via equity as well as non-equity linkages with foreign firms is also observed. Given that technological upgrading can result from FDI inflows by foreign firms, a truly \"joint\" nature of equity and non-equity forms of investment projects would serve as a win-win option for Thai and foreign firms, especially under the \"Thailand 4.0\" policy framework.","PeriodicalId":43712,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian Economies","volume":"39 1","pages":"68 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financing Choices for Technological Upgrading: Evidence from Interviews with Thai Firms\",\"authors\":\"Hikari Ishido, Licheng Liang, Benjalux Sakunasingha\",\"doi\":\"10.1355/ae39-1d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This research investigates the significance of technological innovation for Thailand's industrial development through equity participation in the form of foreign direct investment (FDI). The pecking order theory suggests that to finance technological upgrading, firms tend to prioritize internal funding, and use debt and equity financing as the last resort. In the context of incessant technological change, however, equity financing might be a better choice. This research highlights some aspects of how that is the case by analysing firm-level performance data from Thailand and then conducting in-depth interviews with top executives from several companies located in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). We find that the conventional pecking order theory does not hold when it comes to external financing decisions. The interview insights reveal that, while a majority of companies prioritize internal financing, capturing technology (as intangible assets) via equity as well as non-equity linkages with foreign firms is also observed. Given that technological upgrading can result from FDI inflows by foreign firms, a truly \\\"joint\\\" nature of equity and non-equity forms of investment projects would serve as a win-win option for Thai and foreign firms, especially under the \\\"Thailand 4.0\\\" policy framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southeast Asian Economies\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"68 - 82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southeast Asian Economies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1355/ae39-1d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/ae39-1d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究以外商直接投资(FDI)的股权参与形式考察技术创新对泰国产业发展的意义。优先顺序理论认为,企业在进行技术升级融资时,往往优先考虑内部融资,并将债务和股权融资作为最后手段。然而,在技术不断变革的背景下,股权融资可能是更好的选择。本研究通过分析泰国公司层面的绩效数据,然后对位于东部经济走廊(EEC)的几家公司的高管进行深入访谈,突出了这种情况的一些方面。我们发现,当涉及到外部融资决策时,传统的啄食顺序理论并不成立。访谈结果显示,虽然大多数公司优先考虑内部融资,但也观察到通过股权以及与外国公司的非股权联系获取技术(作为无形资产)。鉴于外国公司的FDI流入可以带来技术升级,股权和非股权形式的投资项目的真正“联合”性质将成为泰国和外国公司的双赢选择,特别是在“泰国4.0”政策框架下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financing Choices for Technological Upgrading: Evidence from Interviews with Thai Firms
Abstract:This research investigates the significance of technological innovation for Thailand's industrial development through equity participation in the form of foreign direct investment (FDI). The pecking order theory suggests that to finance technological upgrading, firms tend to prioritize internal funding, and use debt and equity financing as the last resort. In the context of incessant technological change, however, equity financing might be a better choice. This research highlights some aspects of how that is the case by analysing firm-level performance data from Thailand and then conducting in-depth interviews with top executives from several companies located in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). We find that the conventional pecking order theory does not hold when it comes to external financing decisions. The interview insights reveal that, while a majority of companies prioritize internal financing, capturing technology (as intangible assets) via equity as well as non-equity linkages with foreign firms is also observed. Given that technological upgrading can result from FDI inflows by foreign firms, a truly "joint" nature of equity and non-equity forms of investment projects would serve as a win-win option for Thai and foreign firms, especially under the "Thailand 4.0" policy framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE) is a peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary journal focusing on economic issues in Southeast Asia. JSEAE features articles based on original research, research notes, policy notes, review articles and book reviews, and welcomes submissions of conceptual, theoretical and empirical articles preferably with substantive policy discussions. Original research articles and research notes can be country studies or cross-country comparative studies. For quantitative-oriented articles, authors should strive to ensure that their work is accessible to non-specialists. Submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous peer-review process – two reviewers for original research articles and one reviewer for research notes and policy notes. The journal is published three times a year: April, August and December.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the Impact of Selected Macroeconomic Indicators on Remittance Inflows in the Philippines Avoiding the Resource Curse: Lessons from Indonesia The Vulnerability of Jobs to Mobility Restrictions: Malaysia's Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic How Far Has India Integrated with East Asian Economies? Evidence from International Trade Data Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Labour Market in Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1