{"title":"韩国和新加坡在供水服务方面采用公私伙伴关系的比较研究","authors":"Soojin Kim, Yujin Choi","doi":"10.1108/pap-08-2022-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper investigates the internal factors driving public-private partnership (PPP) adoption for water services in South Korea and Singapore.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilizes a comparative cross-national case study of PPPs in the area of water services by focusing on the similarities and differences between the two countries.FindingsThe findings show that while South Korea has employed the PPP model mostly to expand and modernize their sewage systems, Singapore has used PPPs to build and operate desalination facilities that produce potable water through the treatment and filtration of wastewater. The study also demonstrates that fiscal stress and political incentives stemming from socio-economic pressures are the respective critical factors in South Korea and Singapore’s execution of PPP-driven water infrastructure.Originality/valueThrough exploring why and how PPPs have been adopted in the specific context, this paper might be helpful to enhance our understanding of the variations and common factors in the policy adoption process within the Asian context.","PeriodicalId":34601,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of the adoption of public-private partnerships for water services in South Korea and Singapore\",\"authors\":\"Soojin Kim, Yujin Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pap-08-2022-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper investigates the internal factors driving public-private partnership (PPP) adoption for water services in South Korea and Singapore.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilizes a comparative cross-national case study of PPPs in the area of water services by focusing on the similarities and differences between the two countries.FindingsThe findings show that while South Korea has employed the PPP model mostly to expand and modernize their sewage systems, Singapore has used PPPs to build and operate desalination facilities that produce potable water through the treatment and filtration of wastewater. The study also demonstrates that fiscal stress and political incentives stemming from socio-economic pressures are the respective critical factors in South Korea and Singapore’s execution of PPP-driven water infrastructure.Originality/valueThrough exploring why and how PPPs have been adopted in the specific context, this paper might be helpful to enhance our understanding of the variations and common factors in the policy adoption process within the Asian context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-08-2022-0091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"法学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Policy-An Asia-Pacific Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pap-08-2022-0091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"法学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study of the adoption of public-private partnerships for water services in South Korea and Singapore
PurposeThis paper investigates the internal factors driving public-private partnership (PPP) adoption for water services in South Korea and Singapore.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilizes a comparative cross-national case study of PPPs in the area of water services by focusing on the similarities and differences between the two countries.FindingsThe findings show that while South Korea has employed the PPP model mostly to expand and modernize their sewage systems, Singapore has used PPPs to build and operate desalination facilities that produce potable water through the treatment and filtration of wastewater. The study also demonstrates that fiscal stress and political incentives stemming from socio-economic pressures are the respective critical factors in South Korea and Singapore’s execution of PPP-driven water infrastructure.Originality/valueThrough exploring why and how PPPs have been adopted in the specific context, this paper might be helpful to enhance our understanding of the variations and common factors in the policy adoption process within the Asian context.