通过坎特伯雷灾难性地震事件后的房价差异量化风险感知的变化

IF 0.8 Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pacific Rim Property Research Journal Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14445921.2017.1303262
Callum Logan
{"title":"通过坎特伯雷灾难性地震事件后的房价差异量化风险感知的变化","authors":"Callum Logan","doi":"10.1080/14445921.2017.1303262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Studies of risk perception across multiple disciplines conclude similar findings, one of which is that the perceived risk of extreme and rare events, such as earthquakes, is underestimated before the event and overestimated after the event occurs. This paper examines whether this change in risk perception is detected in price differentials for housing. A Difference-in-Difference (DID) model is used to model the events utilizing control and treatment variables to estimate price determinants. The findings indicate that after the 22 February 2011 Canterbury earthquake consumers’ are paying premiums of 15.1, 18.8 and 16.1% to live on no risk, low risk and medium risk land, respectively, compared to high risk zoned land. This supports the hypothesis that consumers’ perception of risk became more acute after experiencing an extreme event. Risk premiums associated with safer land zones are not evident in the coefficients for control variables implying there was no accounting for land risk before the earthquakes.","PeriodicalId":44302,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Rim Property Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14445921.2017.1303262","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying changes in risk perception through house price differentials following the catastrophic Canterbury earthquake event\",\"authors\":\"Callum Logan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14445921.2017.1303262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Studies of risk perception across multiple disciplines conclude similar findings, one of which is that the perceived risk of extreme and rare events, such as earthquakes, is underestimated before the event and overestimated after the event occurs. This paper examines whether this change in risk perception is detected in price differentials for housing. A Difference-in-Difference (DID) model is used to model the events utilizing control and treatment variables to estimate price determinants. The findings indicate that after the 22 February 2011 Canterbury earthquake consumers’ are paying premiums of 15.1, 18.8 and 16.1% to live on no risk, low risk and medium risk land, respectively, compared to high risk zoned land. This supports the hypothesis that consumers’ perception of risk became more acute after experiencing an extreme event. Risk premiums associated with safer land zones are not evident in the coefficients for control variables implying there was no accounting for land risk before the earthquakes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific Rim Property Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14445921.2017.1303262\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific Rim Property Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2017.1303262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Rim Property Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14445921.2017.1303262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

多个学科的风险感知研究得出了类似的结论,其中之一是极端和罕见事件(如地震)的感知风险在事件发生前被低估,而在事件发生后被高估。本文考察了这种风险感知的变化是否在住房价格差异中被检测到。差分差分(DID)模型用于利用控制变量和处理变量对事件进行建模,以估计价格决定因素。研究结果表明,2011年2月22日坎特伯雷地震后,消费者在无风险、低风险和中风险地区生活的保费分别为15.1%、18.8%和16.1%。这支持了消费者在经历极端事件后对风险的感知变得更加敏锐的假设。在控制变量的系数中,与更安全的土地区域相关的风险溢价并不明显,这意味着地震前没有考虑到土地风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying changes in risk perception through house price differentials following the catastrophic Canterbury earthquake event
Abstract Studies of risk perception across multiple disciplines conclude similar findings, one of which is that the perceived risk of extreme and rare events, such as earthquakes, is underestimated before the event and overestimated after the event occurs. This paper examines whether this change in risk perception is detected in price differentials for housing. A Difference-in-Difference (DID) model is used to model the events utilizing control and treatment variables to estimate price determinants. The findings indicate that after the 22 February 2011 Canterbury earthquake consumers’ are paying premiums of 15.1, 18.8 and 16.1% to live on no risk, low risk and medium risk land, respectively, compared to high risk zoned land. This supports the hypothesis that consumers’ perception of risk became more acute after experiencing an extreme event. Risk premiums associated with safer land zones are not evident in the coefficients for control variables implying there was no accounting for land risk before the earthquakes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
A contrariant observation on assumed rising property values and value capture Feng Shui and superstition in Hong Kong’s residential housing market Housing construction materials and house rent trends in Ede, Nigeria On the American perception of real estate as business: revisiting the ontological project of Julian Diaz III Supply and demand approaches to the urban residential property prices determination; transactions evidence from Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1