{"title":"利用可解释深度学习从地震和弹性属性测井预测页岩矿物学脆性指数","authors":"Jaewook Lee , David E. Lumley","doi":"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The mineralogical brittleness index<span><span><span> (MBI) of organic-rich shale formations is one of the key parameters to identify the optimal production well locations and optimize hydraulic fracturing. Since we as a community don't understand the exact physical relationship between the MBI and </span>seismic properties<span> from well logs, we have used traditional approaches like the log-based brittleness index (LBI) and the elastic brittleness index (EBI) to quantify the rock brittleness from </span></span>seismic data<span> and well logs. The LBI method is easy to use but is empirically derived from the porosity and sonic logs. On the other hand, the EBI method is dependent on the average values of Young's modulus and </span></span></span>Poisson's ratio<span><span> but is not physically meaningful in practice. Therefore, we develop a deep learning approach to obtain a more reliable MBI model from seismic properties and enhance the interpretability with Shapley values. First, we analyze the statistical relationship between the MBI and eight seismic properties from well logs and distinguish the influential input variables for the MBI prediction, such as bulk density, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio. Second, we find a multivariate linear regression (MLR) model with three input properties and quantify the relative statistical contribution of each input based on Shapley values. Third, we use a </span>deep neural network<span> technique to derive the nonlinear estimation model with a better fit to the MBI data than the traditional methods. We test and verify our approach on field log and core data from the Wolfcamp shales in the Permian Basin, Texas. In conclusion, this workflow can provide a more interpretable and accurate MBI estimation from seismic properties to enhance unconventional shale </span></span></span>reservoir characterization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 111231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting shale mineralogical brittleness index from seismic and elastic property logs using interpretable deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Jaewook Lee , David E. Lumley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The mineralogical brittleness index<span><span><span> (MBI) of organic-rich shale formations is one of the key parameters to identify the optimal production well locations and optimize hydraulic fracturing. Since we as a community don't understand the exact physical relationship between the MBI and </span>seismic properties<span> from well logs, we have used traditional approaches like the log-based brittleness index (LBI) and the elastic brittleness index (EBI) to quantify the rock brittleness from </span></span>seismic data<span> and well logs. The LBI method is easy to use but is empirically derived from the porosity and sonic logs. On the other hand, the EBI method is dependent on the average values of Young's modulus and </span></span></span>Poisson's ratio<span><span> but is not physically meaningful in practice. Therefore, we develop a deep learning approach to obtain a more reliable MBI model from seismic properties and enhance the interpretability with Shapley values. First, we analyze the statistical relationship between the MBI and eight seismic properties from well logs and distinguish the influential input variables for the MBI prediction, such as bulk density, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio. Second, we find a multivariate linear regression (MLR) model with three input properties and quantify the relative statistical contribution of each input based on Shapley values. Third, we use a </span>deep neural network<span> technique to derive the nonlinear estimation model with a better fit to the MBI data than the traditional methods. We test and verify our approach on field log and core data from the Wolfcamp shales in the Permian Basin, Texas. In conclusion, this workflow can provide a more interpretable and accurate MBI estimation from seismic properties to enhance unconventional shale </span></span></span>reservoir characterization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092041052201083X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092041052201083X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting shale mineralogical brittleness index from seismic and elastic property logs using interpretable deep learning
The mineralogical brittleness index (MBI) of organic-rich shale formations is one of the key parameters to identify the optimal production well locations and optimize hydraulic fracturing. Since we as a community don't understand the exact physical relationship between the MBI and seismic properties from well logs, we have used traditional approaches like the log-based brittleness index (LBI) and the elastic brittleness index (EBI) to quantify the rock brittleness from seismic data and well logs. The LBI method is easy to use but is empirically derived from the porosity and sonic logs. On the other hand, the EBI method is dependent on the average values of Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio but is not physically meaningful in practice. Therefore, we develop a deep learning approach to obtain a more reliable MBI model from seismic properties and enhance the interpretability with Shapley values. First, we analyze the statistical relationship between the MBI and eight seismic properties from well logs and distinguish the influential input variables for the MBI prediction, such as bulk density, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio. Second, we find a multivariate linear regression (MLR) model with three input properties and quantify the relative statistical contribution of each input based on Shapley values. Third, we use a deep neural network technique to derive the nonlinear estimation model with a better fit to the MBI data than the traditional methods. We test and verify our approach on field log and core data from the Wolfcamp shales in the Permian Basin, Texas. In conclusion, this workflow can provide a more interpretable and accurate MBI estimation from seismic properties to enhance unconventional shale reservoir characterization.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering, the geology and the science of petroleum and natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of petroleum engineering, natural gas engineering and petroleum (natural gas) geology. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership.
The Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering covers the fields of petroleum (and natural gas) exploration, production and flow in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of petroleum and natural gas; petroleum geochemistry; reservoir engineering; reservoir simulation; rock mechanics; petrophysics; pore-level phenomena; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced oil and gas recovery; petroleum geology; compaction/diagenesis; petroleum economics; drilling and drilling fluids; thermodynamics and phase behavior; fluid mechanics; multi-phase flow in porous media; production engineering; formation evaluation; exploration methods; CO2 Sequestration in geological formations/sub-surface; management and development of unconventional resources such as heavy oil and bitumen, tight oil and liquid rich shales.