{"title":"能源安全和“大棒”立法","authors":"K. Pan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3671131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy security is the central goal of energy policy. It is a multidimensional concept that incorporates notions of adequacy, reliability, affordability and sustainability. However, Australia’s ongoing energy crisis, particularly on the country’s east and south coast, suggests that Australian energy law has failed to rise to the challenge of achieving energy security at a time when our climate continues to change. In an attempt to improve Australia’s energy security, the Commonwealth government has recently turned to “big stick” legislation aimed at curbing energy market misconduct. This article analyses whether the Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Act 2019 (Cth) truly possesses energy security merit, or instead illustrates the government’s lack of vision at a critical juncture in energy law.","PeriodicalId":43671,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Planning Law Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"607-625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Security and 'Big Stick' Legislation\",\"authors\":\"K. Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3671131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Energy security is the central goal of energy policy. It is a multidimensional concept that incorporates notions of adequacy, reliability, affordability and sustainability. However, Australia’s ongoing energy crisis, particularly on the country’s east and south coast, suggests that Australian energy law has failed to rise to the challenge of achieving energy security at a time when our climate continues to change. In an attempt to improve Australia’s energy security, the Commonwealth government has recently turned to “big stick” legislation aimed at curbing energy market misconduct. This article analyses whether the Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Act 2019 (Cth) truly possesses energy security merit, or instead illustrates the government’s lack of vision at a critical juncture in energy law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Planning Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"607-625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Planning Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3671131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Planning Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3671131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Energy security is the central goal of energy policy. It is a multidimensional concept that incorporates notions of adequacy, reliability, affordability and sustainability. However, Australia’s ongoing energy crisis, particularly on the country’s east and south coast, suggests that Australian energy law has failed to rise to the challenge of achieving energy security at a time when our climate continues to change. In an attempt to improve Australia’s energy security, the Commonwealth government has recently turned to “big stick” legislation aimed at curbing energy market misconduct. This article analyses whether the Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Act 2019 (Cth) truly possesses energy security merit, or instead illustrates the government’s lack of vision at a critical juncture in energy law.