迈向弹性分析的核心指标:促进协调指标和经验一致性的框架

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100655
Mark A. Constas , Marco d’Errico , Rebecca Pietrelli
{"title":"迈向弹性分析的核心指标:促进协调指标和经验一致性的框架","authors":"Mark A. Constas ,&nbsp;Marco d’Errico ,&nbsp;Rebecca Pietrelli","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As applications of resilience have increased the associated measurement options have grown. An unintended consequence of such growth is that the proliferation of resilience measurement approaches hinders efforts to generate evidence that is conceptually consistent and empirically comparable. To address this problem, the present paper provides a framework to promote harmonized measurement of resilience. The framework is structured around three components: fundamental resilience concepts, resilience measurement domains, and integrated resilience measurement. To illustrate how elements of the framework can be applied to an empirical investigation, a set of indicators from a resilience-focused food security study was examined. In the conclusion, potential benefits of harmonized resilience measurement are discussed, and some challenges are considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100655"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912422000451/pdfft?md5=3d64ce7437591480e647fb549338aae4&pid=1-s2.0-S2211912422000451-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Core Indicators for Resilience Analysis: A framework to promote harmonized metrics and empirical coherence\",\"authors\":\"Mark A. Constas ,&nbsp;Marco d’Errico ,&nbsp;Rebecca Pietrelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As applications of resilience have increased the associated measurement options have grown. An unintended consequence of such growth is that the proliferation of resilience measurement approaches hinders efforts to generate evidence that is conceptually consistent and empirically comparable. To address this problem, the present paper provides a framework to promote harmonized measurement of resilience. The framework is structured around three components: fundamental resilience concepts, resilience measurement domains, and integrated resilience measurement. To illustrate how elements of the framework can be applied to an empirical investigation, a set of indicators from a resilience-focused food security study was examined. In the conclusion, potential benefits of harmonized resilience measurement are discussed, and some challenges are considered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912422000451/pdfft?md5=3d64ce7437591480e647fb549338aae4&pid=1-s2.0-S2211912422000451-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912422000451\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912422000451","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着弹性应用的增加,相关的测量选项也在增加。这种增长的一个意想不到的后果是,弹性测量方法的激增阻碍了产生概念上一致和经验上可比较的证据的努力。为了解决这一问题,本文提供了一个框架来促进弹性的协调测量。该框架由三个部分组成:基本弹性概念、弹性测量域和综合弹性测量。为了说明如何将框架的要素应用于实证调查,研究了一项以恢复力为重点的粮食安全研究的一组指标。最后,讨论了协调弹性测量的潜在效益,并考虑了一些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward Core Indicators for Resilience Analysis: A framework to promote harmonized metrics and empirical coherence

As applications of resilience have increased the associated measurement options have grown. An unintended consequence of such growth is that the proliferation of resilience measurement approaches hinders efforts to generate evidence that is conceptually consistent and empirically comparable. To address this problem, the present paper provides a framework to promote harmonized measurement of resilience. The framework is structured around three components: fundamental resilience concepts, resilience measurement domains, and integrated resilience measurement. To illustrate how elements of the framework can be applied to an empirical investigation, a set of indicators from a resilience-focused food security study was examined. In the conclusion, potential benefits of harmonized resilience measurement are discussed, and some challenges are considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
期刊最新文献
Revealing the power of green leafy vegetables: Cultivating diversity for health, environmental benefits, and sustainability Do diverse crops or diverse market purchases matter more for women's diet quality in farm households of Mali? How to monitor the ‘success’ of agricultural sustainability: A perspective Defining and measuring policy coherence for food system transformation: A scoping review Resilient and inclusive rural transformation in sub-Saharan Africa under climate, demographic, and social change: Challenges and opportunities for income growth and job creation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1