通过竞争深化民主?1968年5月的勒福特和高切特及其遗产

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Tocqueville Review Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.3138/ttr.41.1.121
Wim Weymans
{"title":"通过竞争深化民主?1968年5月的勒福特和高切特及其遗产","authors":"Wim Weymans","doi":"10.3138/ttr.41.1.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Which forms of contestation are beneficial for democracies, and which are not? This essay responds to this question by looking at writings on political contestation during 1968 by the French political theorist Claude Lefort. Although Lefort is now seen as a major theorist of democracy, I show that in 1968 he made almost no reference to democracy. Only from the 1970s onwards did he develop an elaborate theory of democracy that allowed him to better explain the role democracy and its symbolic principles could play in fostering contestation and also changed what he saw as proper forms of contestation. While in 1968 he had been enthusiastic about selfmanagement and was critical of traditional structures, in the 1970s almost the reverse was true. This essay ends with a brief comparison with Gauchet, which shows that Lefort, unlike Gauchet, continued to believe that democracies need contestation to flourish. In spite of all the changes in his theory post-1968, Lefort thus held on to 1968's spirit of contestation.","PeriodicalId":41972,"journal":{"name":"Tocqueville Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"121 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deepening Democracy Through Contestation? Lefort and Gauchet on May 1968 and its Legacy\",\"authors\":\"Wim Weymans\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ttr.41.1.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Which forms of contestation are beneficial for democracies, and which are not? This essay responds to this question by looking at writings on political contestation during 1968 by the French political theorist Claude Lefort. Although Lefort is now seen as a major theorist of democracy, I show that in 1968 he made almost no reference to democracy. Only from the 1970s onwards did he develop an elaborate theory of democracy that allowed him to better explain the role democracy and its symbolic principles could play in fostering contestation and also changed what he saw as proper forms of contestation. While in 1968 he had been enthusiastic about selfmanagement and was critical of traditional structures, in the 1970s almost the reverse was true. This essay ends with a brief comparison with Gauchet, which shows that Lefort, unlike Gauchet, continued to believe that democracies need contestation to flourish. In spite of all the changes in his theory post-1968, Lefort thus held on to 1968's spirit of contestation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tocqueville Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ttr.41.1.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tocqueville Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ttr.41.1.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:哪些形式的竞争对民主有利,哪些不有利?本文通过考察法国政治理论家克劳德·勒福特1968年关于政治争论的著作来回答这个问题。尽管勒福特现在被视为民主的主要理论家,但我表明,在1968年,他几乎没有提到民主。直到20世纪70年代以后,他才发展出一种精心设计的民主理论,使他能够更好地解释民主及其象征性原则在促进竞争中可以发挥的作用,并改变了他认为的适当的竞争形式。1968年,他一直热衷于自我管理,并对传统结构持批评态度,但在20世纪70年代,情况几乎相反。这篇文章最后与高切特进行了简短的比较,这表明勒福特不同于高切特,他继续认为民主国家需要竞争才能繁荣。尽管1968年后勒福的理论发生了种种变化,但他始终坚持着1968年的抗争精神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deepening Democracy Through Contestation? Lefort and Gauchet on May 1968 and its Legacy
Abstract:Which forms of contestation are beneficial for democracies, and which are not? This essay responds to this question by looking at writings on political contestation during 1968 by the French political theorist Claude Lefort. Although Lefort is now seen as a major theorist of democracy, I show that in 1968 he made almost no reference to democracy. Only from the 1970s onwards did he develop an elaborate theory of democracy that allowed him to better explain the role democracy and its symbolic principles could play in fostering contestation and also changed what he saw as proper forms of contestation. While in 1968 he had been enthusiastic about selfmanagement and was critical of traditional structures, in the 1970s almost the reverse was true. This essay ends with a brief comparison with Gauchet, which shows that Lefort, unlike Gauchet, continued to believe that democracies need contestation to flourish. In spite of all the changes in his theory post-1968, Lefort thus held on to 1968's spirit of contestation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tocqueville Review
Tocqueville Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
La conversion de l'histoire est-elle possible ? Les limites de l'influence de Carl Schmitt sur Raymond Aron : le concept de souveraineté de l'État et celui de l'hostilité absolue The American Red Cross and Disaster Relief in the 1960s: Nonprofits and Mass Philanthropy in an Era of Rising Expectations Comprendre "L'homme qui comprit la démocratie": Table ronde autour de l'ouvrage d'Olivier Zunz Getting Inequality Right: A Zunzian Perspective on the Reformulation of the American Promise The People's Branch: The U.S. Congress and the Democratic State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1