早期妊娠妇女广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表的信度和效度

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Reproductive and Developmental Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-21 DOI:10.1097/RD9.0000000000000046
Li-li Gong, Xiaodi Xie, Si-Tong Liu, Weihong Hu, Yu-Jie Niu, Yi Sun, Jun-sheng Liu, X. Xia
{"title":"早期妊娠妇女广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表的信度和效度","authors":"Li-li Gong, Xiaodi Xie, Si-Tong Liu, Weihong Hu, Yu-Jie Niu, Yi Sun, Jun-sheng Liu, X. Xia","doi":"10.1097/RD9.0000000000000046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the structural reliability and validity of generalized anxiety disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale in early pregnant women. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30,823 patients in early pregnancy registered in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University completed the GAD-7 scale and patient health questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9). The discriminative ability, reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity were assessed to evaluate the psychometric properties and factor structures. Items with a discrimination parameter (α) of <0.65, factor loading of <0.30, or cross loading of >0.40 in two or more factors simultaneously were deleted from the scale. Results: All GAD-7 scale items exhibited a high discrimination power. The reliability of the GAD-7 scale was good (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.891). Exploratory factor analysis extracted one factor with eigenvalues of greater than 1.0, which explained 61.930% of the common variance. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the one-factor structure fitted the data well. The correlation coefficient with the PHQ-9 was 0.639. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the GAD-7 scale can be used as a screening tool for early pregnant women. It performs well in terms of discriminative ability, reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity. Pregnant women who screen positive may require more attention and investigation to confirm the presence of generalized anxiety disorder.","PeriodicalId":20959,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":"249 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale in early pregnant women\",\"authors\":\"Li-li Gong, Xiaodi Xie, Si-Tong Liu, Weihong Hu, Yu-Jie Niu, Yi Sun, Jun-sheng Liu, X. Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RD9.0000000000000046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the structural reliability and validity of generalized anxiety disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale in early pregnant women. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30,823 patients in early pregnancy registered in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University completed the GAD-7 scale and patient health questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9). The discriminative ability, reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity were assessed to evaluate the psychometric properties and factor structures. Items with a discrimination parameter (α) of <0.65, factor loading of <0.30, or cross loading of >0.40 in two or more factors simultaneously were deleted from the scale. Results: All GAD-7 scale items exhibited a high discrimination power. The reliability of the GAD-7 scale was good (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.891). Exploratory factor analysis extracted one factor with eigenvalues of greater than 1.0, which explained 61.930% of the common variance. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the one-factor structure fitted the data well. The correlation coefficient with the PHQ-9 was 0.639. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the GAD-7 scale can be used as a screening tool for early pregnant women. It performs well in terms of discriminative ability, reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity. Pregnant women who screen positive may require more attention and investigation to confirm the presence of generalized anxiety disorder.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"249 - 253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RD9.0000000000000046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive and Developmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RD9.0000000000000046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估广泛性焦虑症7项量表在早期孕妇中的结构信度和有效性。方法:对复旦大学妇产科医院登记的30823例早孕患者进行横断面调查,填写GAD-7量表和患者健康问卷-9项(PHQ-9)。通过判别能力、信度、构念有效性和标准有效性来评估心理测量特性和因素结构。同时在两个或多个因素中判别参数(α)为0.40的项目从量表中删除。结果:所有GAD-7量表项目均表现出较高的辨别力。GAD-7量表的信度良好(Cronbachα系数=0.891)。探索性因子分析提取了一个特征值大于1.0的因子,解释了61.930%的共同方差。验证性因子分析证实,单因子结构与数据拟合良好。与PHQ-9的相关系数为0.639。结论:GAD-7量表中文版可作为早期孕妇的筛查工具。它在判别能力、信度、构念有效性和标准有效性方面表现良好。筛查呈阳性的孕妇可能需要更多的关注和调查,以确认是否存在广泛性焦虑症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and validity of generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale in early pregnant women
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the structural reliability and validity of generalized anxiety disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale in early pregnant women. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30,823 patients in early pregnancy registered in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University completed the GAD-7 scale and patient health questionnaire-9 item (PHQ-9). The discriminative ability, reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity were assessed to evaluate the psychometric properties and factor structures. Items with a discrimination parameter (α) of <0.65, factor loading of <0.30, or cross loading of >0.40 in two or more factors simultaneously were deleted from the scale. Results: All GAD-7 scale items exhibited a high discrimination power. The reliability of the GAD-7 scale was good (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.891). Exploratory factor analysis extracted one factor with eigenvalues of greater than 1.0, which explained 61.930% of the common variance. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the one-factor structure fitted the data well. The correlation coefficient with the PHQ-9 was 0.639. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the GAD-7 scale can be used as a screening tool for early pregnant women. It performs well in terms of discriminative ability, reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity. Pregnant women who screen positive may require more attention and investigation to confirm the presence of generalized anxiety disorder.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine
Reproductive and Developmental Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
384
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exogenous estrogen partially rescues progesterone deficiency and autophagosome enlargement in Mcoln1 -/- mouse model with lysosomal storage disorder. Study of the influence of the biochemical composition of the human native ejaculate on the preservation of the male gametes’ activity after the application of cryopreservation technology Impact of Microbiota on Female Fertility and Gynecological problems Machine learning-based prediction of pregnancy outcomes in couples with non-obstructive azoospermia using micro-TESE for ICSI: a retrospective cohort study Text mining and data analysis identifies potential drugs and pathways for polycystic ovary syndrome treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1