Mostafa Ashry, Wen-Bin Shen, Hussein A. Abd-Elmotaal
{"title":"非洲浅层法大地水准面模型","authors":"Mostafa Ashry, Wen-Bin Shen, Hussein A. Abd-Elmotaal","doi":"10.1007/s11200-020-0301-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of the current investigation is to determine an alternative geoid model for Africa using the shallow-layer method. The shallow-layer method, following the basic definition of the geoid, differs essentially from the traditional geoid determination techniques (Stokes and Molodensky) that it doesn’t need real gravity data. It comes from the definition of the geoid. Here, the shallow-layer method is used to determine a 5′ × 5′ geoid model for Africa covering the latitudes between ?36°N and 39°N and longitudes from ?20°E to 53°E The Earth Gravitational Model (EGM2008), the global topographic model (DTM2006.0), the global crustal model (CRUST1.0) and the Danish National Space Center data set (DNSC08) global models have been used to construct and define the shallow layer and its interior structure. A combination of prism and tesseroid modelling methods have been utilized to determine the gravitational potential produced by the shallow-layer masses. The validation and tests of the computed shallow-layer geoid have been done at two different levels. First, a comparison between the computed shallow-layer geoid and the recently developed AFRgeo2019 gravimetric geoid for Africa (based on real gravity data) has been carried out. Second, a comparison of the computed shallow-layer geoid with several geoid models computed using different global geopotential models has been performed. The results show that the computed shallow-layer geoid behaves similarly to those determined by the global geopotential models. Differences between the shallow-layer and the AFRgeo2019 gravimetric geoids are generally small (below 0.5 m) at most of the African continent</p>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"65 2","pages":"148 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11200-020-0301-0","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An alternative geoid model for Africa using the shallow-layer method\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Ashry, Wen-Bin Shen, Hussein A. Abd-Elmotaal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11200-020-0301-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of the current investigation is to determine an alternative geoid model for Africa using the shallow-layer method. The shallow-layer method, following the basic definition of the geoid, differs essentially from the traditional geoid determination techniques (Stokes and Molodensky) that it doesn’t need real gravity data. It comes from the definition of the geoid. Here, the shallow-layer method is used to determine a 5′ × 5′ geoid model for Africa covering the latitudes between ?36°N and 39°N and longitudes from ?20°E to 53°E The Earth Gravitational Model (EGM2008), the global topographic model (DTM2006.0), the global crustal model (CRUST1.0) and the Danish National Space Center data set (DNSC08) global models have been used to construct and define the shallow layer and its interior structure. A combination of prism and tesseroid modelling methods have been utilized to determine the gravitational potential produced by the shallow-layer masses. The validation and tests of the computed shallow-layer geoid have been done at two different levels. First, a comparison between the computed shallow-layer geoid and the recently developed AFRgeo2019 gravimetric geoid for Africa (based on real gravity data) has been carried out. Second, a comparison of the computed shallow-layer geoid with several geoid models computed using different global geopotential models has been performed. The results show that the computed shallow-layer geoid behaves similarly to those determined by the global geopotential models. Differences between the shallow-layer and the AFRgeo2019 gravimetric geoids are generally small (below 0.5 m) at most of the African continent</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"148 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11200-020-0301-0\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-020-0301-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-020-0301-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
目前调查的目的是利用浅层方法确定非洲的另一种大地水准面模型。浅层法遵循大地水准面基本定义,与传统的大地水准面确定技术(Stokes和Molodensky)有本质区别,不需要实际重力数据。它来自大地水准面的定义。本文采用浅层法确定了覆盖纬度为- 36°N ~ 39°N,经度为- 20°E ~ 53°E的非洲5′× 5′大地面线模型,并利用地球引力模型(EGM2008)、全球地形模型(DTM2006.0)、全球地壳模型(地壳1.0)和丹麦国家空间中心数据集(DNSC08)全球模型构建并定义了浅层及其内部结构。利用棱镜和曲面相结合的建模方法来确定浅层质量产生的重力势。计算得到的浅层大地水准面在两个不同的水平上进行了验证和试验。首先,将计算得到的浅层大地水准面与最近开发的非洲重力大地水准面(基于真实重力数据)进行了比较。其次,将计算得到的浅层大地水准面与使用不同全球地球势模型计算得到的几种大地水准面模型进行了比较。结果表明,计算得到的浅层大地水准面与全球地球势模型确定的大地水准面相似。在非洲大陆的大部分地区,浅层与AFRgeo2019重力大地水准面之间的差异通常很小(小于0.5 m)
An alternative geoid model for Africa using the shallow-layer method
The aim of the current investigation is to determine an alternative geoid model for Africa using the shallow-layer method. The shallow-layer method, following the basic definition of the geoid, differs essentially from the traditional geoid determination techniques (Stokes and Molodensky) that it doesn’t need real gravity data. It comes from the definition of the geoid. Here, the shallow-layer method is used to determine a 5′ × 5′ geoid model for Africa covering the latitudes between ?36°N and 39°N and longitudes from ?20°E to 53°E The Earth Gravitational Model (EGM2008), the global topographic model (DTM2006.0), the global crustal model (CRUST1.0) and the Danish National Space Center data set (DNSC08) global models have been used to construct and define the shallow layer and its interior structure. A combination of prism and tesseroid modelling methods have been utilized to determine the gravitational potential produced by the shallow-layer masses. The validation and tests of the computed shallow-layer geoid have been done at two different levels. First, a comparison between the computed shallow-layer geoid and the recently developed AFRgeo2019 gravimetric geoid for Africa (based on real gravity data) has been carried out. Second, a comparison of the computed shallow-layer geoid with several geoid models computed using different global geopotential models has been performed. The results show that the computed shallow-layer geoid behaves similarly to those determined by the global geopotential models. Differences between the shallow-layer and the AFRgeo2019 gravimetric geoids are generally small (below 0.5 m) at most of the African continent
期刊介绍:
Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.