考察视频分析在教师教学和教师成果中的应用

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Special Education Pub Date : 2022-11-24 DOI:10.1177/00224669221133773
McKenzie Meline, Beth A. Harn, Elisa M. Jamgochian, M. K. Stickland-Cohen, Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Audrey Lucero
{"title":"考察视频分析在教师教学和教师成果中的应用","authors":"McKenzie Meline, Beth A. Harn, Elisa M. Jamgochian, M. K. Stickland-Cohen, Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Audrey Lucero","doi":"10.1177/00224669221133773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the literature base of single-case research design studies using video analysis to determine its effectiveness on teacher outcomes. Primary, ancestral, citation, and first author searches identified 12,047 dissertations and peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2020. Each study (n = 24) was scored on its adherence to the What Works Clearinghouse design quality standards. A total of 16 articles were reviewed for statistical analysis, in which a between-case standardized mean difference was used to calculate effect sizes. Results indicate praise (n = 6; g = 2.66–0.37) and implementation (n = 6; g = 3.64–1.07) had effect sizes that continue to define video analysis as a promising practice. Recommendations for future practice include improving the methodological rigor of studies and increasing sample size to prove the generalizability of video analysis. Addressing these recommendations will support video analysis becoming an evidence-based practice (EBP) for educator development.","PeriodicalId":47783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Use of Video Analysis on Teacher Instruction and Teacher Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"McKenzie Meline, Beth A. Harn, Elisa M. Jamgochian, M. K. Stickland-Cohen, Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Audrey Lucero\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00224669221133773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the literature base of single-case research design studies using video analysis to determine its effectiveness on teacher outcomes. Primary, ancestral, citation, and first author searches identified 12,047 dissertations and peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2020. Each study (n = 24) was scored on its adherence to the What Works Clearinghouse design quality standards. A total of 16 articles were reviewed for statistical analysis, in which a between-case standardized mean difference was used to calculate effect sizes. Results indicate praise (n = 6; g = 2.66–0.37) and implementation (n = 6; g = 3.64–1.07) had effect sizes that continue to define video analysis as a promising practice. Recommendations for future practice include improving the methodological rigor of studies and increasing sample size to prove the generalizability of video analysis. Addressing these recommendations will support video analysis becoming an evidence-based practice (EBP) for educator development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Special Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221133773\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669221133773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本荟萃分析的目的是使用视频分析检查单例研究设计研究的文献基础,以确定其对教师成果的有效性。主要、祖先、引用和第一作者搜索确定了2010年至2020年发表的12047篇论文和同行评议文章。每个研究(n = 24)根据其对What Works Clearinghouse设计质量标准的遵守程度进行评分。共回顾了16篇文章进行统计分析,其中使用病例间标准化平均差来计算效应量。结果表明表扬(n = 6;G = 2.66-0.37)和执行情况(n = 6;G = 3.64-1.07)的效应值继续将视频分析定义为一种有前途的实践。对未来实践的建议包括改进研究方法的严谨性和增加样本量以证明视频分析的普遍性。解决这些建议将支持视频分析成为教育工作者发展的循证实践(EBP)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Use of Video Analysis on Teacher Instruction and Teacher Outcomes
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the literature base of single-case research design studies using video analysis to determine its effectiveness on teacher outcomes. Primary, ancestral, citation, and first author searches identified 12,047 dissertations and peer-reviewed articles published from 2010 to 2020. Each study (n = 24) was scored on its adherence to the What Works Clearinghouse design quality standards. A total of 16 articles were reviewed for statistical analysis, in which a between-case standardized mean difference was used to calculate effect sizes. Results indicate praise (n = 6; g = 2.66–0.37) and implementation (n = 6; g = 3.64–1.07) had effect sizes that continue to define video analysis as a promising practice. Recommendations for future practice include improving the methodological rigor of studies and increasing sample size to prove the generalizability of video analysis. Addressing these recommendations will support video analysis becoming an evidence-based practice (EBP) for educator development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Special Education
Journal of Special Education EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Special Education (JSE) is a multidisciplinary publication presenting primary research and scholarly reviews related to special education. The goal of this journal is to add to current scholarship and provide a sense of emerging directions in the field. Manuscripts initially are screened for (a) appropriateness of content for JSE, (b) adherence to guidelines specified in the APA publication manual, (c) readability of text, and (d) explicit statement of implications for the practice of special education.
期刊最新文献
A Meta-Analysis of the Graduated Guidance Procedure An Analysis of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction Coaching Model Principles in High School Classrooms A Case Study on the Museum Commentary Scenario for People with Developmental Disabilities The Effect of Self-regulated Strategy Development on Word-Problem Solving in Children at Risk of Mathematical Learning Disabilities Trends and Tasks in Intervention Research to Enhance Peer Interactions for Elementary Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1