Hanoch-Dagan与自由主义自治观

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW International Journal of Law in Context Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1017/S1744552321000641
G. Alexander
{"title":"Hanoch-Dagan与自由主义自治观","authors":"G. Alexander","doi":"10.1017/S1744552321000641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scarcely anything these days is said in property circles about autonomy. Much is said about costs and about the structure of property (Smith, 2004; 2012). A few libertarians and Kantians, mainly from our neighbours to the North (Ripstein, 2009; Weinrib, 2012), do discuss independence, but independence is not the same as autonomy. Autonomy and its relationship to property are largely neglected topics. All that changes with the appearance of Hanoch Dagan’s important new book (Dagan, 2021). The greatest achievement of his book is to base property, as both a concept and an institution, on personal autonomy. This is a major contribution not only to property theory, but also to liberal theory in general, and it deserves a wide and diverse audience. There is a long tradition in liberal political and legal thought defining freedom in terms of independence, understood as a constraint on the conduct of others. Dagan departs from this tradition by defining freedom in terms of autonomy:","PeriodicalId":45455,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in Context","volume":"18 1","pages":"237 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hanoch Dagan and the liberal concept of autonomy\",\"authors\":\"G. Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1744552321000641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scarcely anything these days is said in property circles about autonomy. Much is said about costs and about the structure of property (Smith, 2004; 2012). A few libertarians and Kantians, mainly from our neighbours to the North (Ripstein, 2009; Weinrib, 2012), do discuss independence, but independence is not the same as autonomy. Autonomy and its relationship to property are largely neglected topics. All that changes with the appearance of Hanoch Dagan’s important new book (Dagan, 2021). The greatest achievement of his book is to base property, as both a concept and an institution, on personal autonomy. This is a major contribution not only to property theory, but also to liberal theory in general, and it deserves a wide and diverse audience. There is a long tradition in liberal political and legal thought defining freedom in terms of independence, understood as a constraint on the conduct of others. Dagan departs from this tradition by defining freedom in terms of autonomy:\",\"PeriodicalId\":45455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law in Context\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"237 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552321000641\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in Context","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552321000641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,房地产界几乎没有任何关于自治的言论。关于成本和房地产结构,有很多说法(Smith,2004;2012)。一些自由主义者和康德主义者,主要来自我们北方的邻国(Ripstein,2009;Weinrib,2012),确实讨论过独立,但独立与自治不同。自治及其与财产的关系在很大程度上是被忽视的话题。这一切都随着Hanoch Dagan的重要新书(Dagan,2021)的出现而改变。他的书最大的成就是将财产作为一种概念和制度建立在个人自主的基础上。这不仅是对财产论的重大贡献,也是对一般自由主义理论的重大贡献。它值得广泛而多样的受众。自由主义政治和法律思想有着悠久的传统,将自由定义为独立,被理解为对他人行为的约束。达根背离了这一传统,从自治的角度定义了自由:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hanoch Dagan and the liberal concept of autonomy
Scarcely anything these days is said in property circles about autonomy. Much is said about costs and about the structure of property (Smith, 2004; 2012). A few libertarians and Kantians, mainly from our neighbours to the North (Ripstein, 2009; Weinrib, 2012), do discuss independence, but independence is not the same as autonomy. Autonomy and its relationship to property are largely neglected topics. All that changes with the appearance of Hanoch Dagan’s important new book (Dagan, 2021). The greatest achievement of his book is to base property, as both a concept and an institution, on personal autonomy. This is a major contribution not only to property theory, but also to liberal theory in general, and it deserves a wide and diverse audience. There is a long tradition in liberal political and legal thought defining freedom in terms of independence, understood as a constraint on the conduct of others. Dagan departs from this tradition by defining freedom in terms of autonomy:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Socio-legal instabilities in Ukraine’s wartime Compensation Law for damaged and destroyed residential property Fault Lines in the Rule of Law: Europe’s Present and the Presence of its Past The Role of Judicial Associations in Resisting Rule of Law Backsliding: Hidden Pathways of Protecting Judicial Independence Amidst Rule of Law Decay Hidden rule of law discontinuities: A theoretical framework for studying rule of law backsliding Backsliding Democracy and the Slippery Slope of Conceptual Weakness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1