医疗补助资格与私人医疗保险补贴对医疗支出、自我报告健康和公共项目参与的影响

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS American Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-29 DOI:10.1086/722982
Silvia Helena Barcellos, Mireille Jacobson, Helen G Levy
{"title":"医疗补助资格与私人医疗保险补贴对医疗支出、自我报告健康和公共项目参与的影响","authors":"Silvia Helena Barcellos, Mireille Jacobson, Helen G Levy","doi":"10.1086/722982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We use a regression discontinuity design to understand the impact of a sharp change in eligibility for Medicaid versus subsidized marketplace insurance at 138 percent of the federal poverty line on coverage, medical spending, health status, and other public program participation. We find a 5.5 percentage point shift from Medicaid to private insurance, with no net change in coverage. The shift increases individual health spending by $341 or 2 percent of income, with larger increases at higher points in the spending distribution. Two-thirds of the increase is from premiums and one-thirdfrom out-of-pocket medical spending. Self-rated health and other public program participation appear unchanged. We find no evidence of bunching below the eligibility threshold, which suggests either that individuals are willing to pay more for private insurance or that optimization frictions are high.</p>","PeriodicalId":45056,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE IMPACT OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID VERSUS SUBSIDIZED PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE ON MEDICAL SPENDING, SELF-REPORTED HEALTH, AND PUBLIC PROGRAM PARTICIPATION.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Helena Barcellos, Mireille Jacobson, Helen G Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We use a regression discontinuity design to understand the impact of a sharp change in eligibility for Medicaid versus subsidized marketplace insurance at 138 percent of the federal poverty line on coverage, medical spending, health status, and other public program participation. We find a 5.5 percentage point shift from Medicaid to private insurance, with no net change in coverage. The shift increases individual health spending by $341 or 2 percent of income, with larger increases at higher points in the spending distribution. Two-thirds of the increase is from premiums and one-thirdfrom out-of-pocket medical spending. Self-rated health and other public program participation appear unchanged. We find no evidence of bunching below the eligibility threshold, which suggests either that individuals are willing to pay more for private insurance or that optimization frictions are high.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068085/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722982\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用回归不连续性设计来了解医疗补助资格与联邦贫困线138%的补贴市场保险资格的急剧变化对覆盖范围、医疗支出、健康状况和其他公共项目参与的影响。我们发现,从医疗补助到私人保险的转变为5.5个百分点,保险范围没有净变化。这一转变使个人医疗支出增加了341美元,占收入的2%,在支出分配的较高点,增幅更大。三分之二的增长来自保费,三分之一来自自付医疗支出。自我评价的健康和其他公共项目参与情况似乎没有变化。我们没有发现低于资格阈值的聚集证据,这表明个人愿意为私人保险支付更多费用,或者优化摩擦很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE IMPACT OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID VERSUS SUBSIDIZED PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE ON MEDICAL SPENDING, SELF-REPORTED HEALTH, AND PUBLIC PROGRAM PARTICIPATION.

We use a regression discontinuity design to understand the impact of a sharp change in eligibility for Medicaid versus subsidized marketplace insurance at 138 percent of the federal poverty line on coverage, medical spending, health status, and other public program participation. We find a 5.5 percentage point shift from Medicaid to private insurance, with no net change in coverage. The shift increases individual health spending by $341 or 2 percent of income, with larger increases at higher points in the spending distribution. Two-thirds of the increase is from premiums and one-thirdfrom out-of-pocket medical spending. Self-rated health and other public program participation appear unchanged. We find no evidence of bunching below the eligibility threshold, which suggests either that individuals are willing to pay more for private insurance or that optimization frictions are high.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health Economics (AJHE) provides a forum for the in-depth analysis of health care markets and individual health behaviors. The articles appearing in AJHE are authored by scholars from universities, private research organizations, government, and industry. Subjects of interest include competition among private insurers, hospitals, and physicians; impacts of public insurance programs, including the Affordable Care Act; pharmaceutical innovation and regulation; medical device supply; the rise of obesity and its consequences; the influence and growth of aging populations; and much more.
期刊最新文献
An Antidote for Despair: The Effect of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) on Suicide Rates Medicare Advantage Has Lower Resource Use and Better Quality of Care than Traditional Medicare Temperature, Mental Health, and Individual Crises: Evidence from Crisis Text Line Reducing Registry Members' Attrition When Invited to Donate: Evidence From a Large Stem Cell Registry Missouri’s Medicaid Contraction and Consumer Financial Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1