2018-19学年医学生学习质量与教育体验的关系

S. Sadrzadeh, S. Mousavi, F. Taghizadeh, B. Kakhki, M. Akbarilakeh, Eelnaz Vafadar Moradi
{"title":"2018-19学年医学生学习质量与教育体验的关系","authors":"S. Sadrzadeh, S. Mousavi, F. Taghizadeh, B. Kakhki, M. Akbarilakeh, Eelnaz Vafadar Moradi","doi":"10.22038/RCM.2020.49128.1322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The effectiveness of the educational system along with the research development in each country is considered as one of the criteria of development measurement. \nMethods: This study is a descriptive - cross-sectional study during 2018-2019. The statistical population includes all medical students who have passed the physiopathology degree in the second semester and data collection is done by field method. The instrument of consists of two parts. The first part contains demographic information of the participants and the second part presents standard questionnaire of educational experience include  Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) and Neumann's Quality of Learning Experience. The data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, Pearson correlation coefficient, independent T-test and ANOVA were used. \nResult: In this research, 45.7% were male) n=49), 54.20% female (n=58), 14% married (n=15), 86% single (n=92), 8.41% Have a work (n=9), 91.58% dont have a work (n=98), and finally 55.1% were interested in their field. There was a significant positive correlation between the scores of appropriate teaching (P-value <0.001), clear goals (P-value <0.001), appropriate evaluation (P-value <0.001), independence (P-value<0.001), and general skill (P-value<0.001), with experiences of courses. The strongest correlation with the quality of educational experiences was the appropriate evaluation (0.65). \nConclusion: The results of this study indicate that in order to achieve the most important goal of medical education, more efforts are needed to improve educational quality.","PeriodicalId":21081,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Clinical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between the Quality of Learning and Educational Experiences of Medical Students During 2018-19\",\"authors\":\"S. Sadrzadeh, S. Mousavi, F. Taghizadeh, B. Kakhki, M. Akbarilakeh, Eelnaz Vafadar Moradi\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/RCM.2020.49128.1322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The effectiveness of the educational system along with the research development in each country is considered as one of the criteria of development measurement. \\nMethods: This study is a descriptive - cross-sectional study during 2018-2019. The statistical population includes all medical students who have passed the physiopathology degree in the second semester and data collection is done by field method. The instrument of consists of two parts. The first part contains demographic information of the participants and the second part presents standard questionnaire of educational experience include  Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) and Neumann's Quality of Learning Experience. The data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, Pearson correlation coefficient, independent T-test and ANOVA were used. \\nResult: In this research, 45.7% were male) n=49), 54.20% female (n=58), 14% married (n=15), 86% single (n=92), 8.41% Have a work (n=9), 91.58% dont have a work (n=98), and finally 55.1% were interested in their field. There was a significant positive correlation between the scores of appropriate teaching (P-value <0.001), clear goals (P-value <0.001), appropriate evaluation (P-value <0.001), independence (P-value<0.001), and general skill (P-value<0.001), with experiences of courses. The strongest correlation with the quality of educational experiences was the appropriate evaluation (0.65). \\nConclusion: The results of this study indicate that in order to achieve the most important goal of medical education, more efforts are needed to improve educational quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/RCM.2020.49128.1322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/RCM.2020.49128.1322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:每个国家的教育体系与研究发展的有效性被认为是衡量发展的标准之一。方法:本研究为描述性横断面研究,研究时间为2018-2019年。统计人群包括所有在第二学期通过生理病理学学位的医学生,数据采集采用现场法。乐器由两部分组成。第一部分是参与者的人口统计信息,第二部分是教育体验的标准问卷,包括课程体验问卷(CEQ)和诺伊曼学习体验质量。数据分析采用均数和标准差,Pearson相关系数、独立t检验和方差分析。结果:本研究中,45.7%为男性(n= 49), 54.20%为女性(n=58), 14%为已婚(n=15), 86%为单身(n=92), 8.41%有工作(n=9), 91.58%没有工作(n=98), 55.1%对自己的专业感兴趣。适当教学(p值<0.001)、明确目标(p值<0.001)、适当评价(p值<0.001)、独立性(p值<0.001)、一般技能(p值<0.001)得分与课程体验呈显著正相关。与教育体验质量相关性最强的是适当评价(0.65)。结论:本研究结果表明,要实现医学教育最重要的目标,需要进一步努力提高教育质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship Between the Quality of Learning and Educational Experiences of Medical Students During 2018-19
Introduction: The effectiveness of the educational system along with the research development in each country is considered as one of the criteria of development measurement. Methods: This study is a descriptive - cross-sectional study during 2018-2019. The statistical population includes all medical students who have passed the physiopathology degree in the second semester and data collection is done by field method. The instrument of consists of two parts. The first part contains demographic information of the participants and the second part presents standard questionnaire of educational experience include  Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) and Neumann's Quality of Learning Experience. The data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, Pearson correlation coefficient, independent T-test and ANOVA were used. Result: In this research, 45.7% were male) n=49), 54.20% female (n=58), 14% married (n=15), 86% single (n=92), 8.41% Have a work (n=9), 91.58% dont have a work (n=98), and finally 55.1% were interested in their field. There was a significant positive correlation between the scores of appropriate teaching (P-value <0.001), clear goals (P-value <0.001), appropriate evaluation (P-value <0.001), independence (P-value<0.001), and general skill (P-value<0.001), with experiences of courses. The strongest correlation with the quality of educational experiences was the appropriate evaluation (0.65). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that in order to achieve the most important goal of medical education, more efforts are needed to improve educational quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Overview of COVID-19 Stigma: India’s perspective “Pain of rejection is more severe than infection” Functional outcome of tibial plateau fractures treated by Locking Compression Plates- A Prospective Study. Evaluation of Interleukin 33 and ST2 serum concentration in active tuberculosis patients Trend and use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Gastroenterology patients. Estrogen on Candida spp. of the vagina: Is there any effect?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1